Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for Authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission Checklist
    • Publication Fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial Policies
    • Editorial Process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Manuscript Progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for Authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission Checklist
    • Publication Fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial Policies
    • Editorial Process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Manuscript Progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CMAJ Open on Twitter
Research
Open Access

Sociodemographic characteristics of women with invasive cervical cancer in British Columbia, 2004–2013: a descriptive study

Jonathan Simkin, Laurie Smith, Dirk van Niekerk, Hannah Caird, Tania Dearden, Kimberly van der Hoek, Nadine R. Caron, Ryan R. Woods, Stuart Peacock and Gina Ogilvie
April 22, 2021 9 (2) E424-E432; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200139
Jonathan Simkin
School of Population and Public Health (Simkin, Caron, Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Cancer Control Research (Simkin, van der Hoek, Woods, Peacock, Ogilvie), BC Cancer; Women’s Health Research Institute (Simkin, Smith, Caird, Ogilvie); Cancer Control Research (Smith, van Niekerk, Caron), BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Caird, Woods, Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; School of Nursing (Dearden), University of British Columbia; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (van der Hoek, Peacock); Centre for Excellence in Indigenous Health (Caron), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurie Smith
School of Population and Public Health (Simkin, Caron, Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Cancer Control Research (Simkin, van der Hoek, Woods, Peacock, Ogilvie), BC Cancer; Women’s Health Research Institute (Simkin, Smith, Caird, Ogilvie); Cancer Control Research (Smith, van Niekerk, Caron), BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Caird, Woods, Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; School of Nursing (Dearden), University of British Columbia; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (van der Hoek, Peacock); Centre for Excellence in Indigenous Health (Caron), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dirk van Niekerk
School of Population and Public Health (Simkin, Caron, Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Cancer Control Research (Simkin, van der Hoek, Woods, Peacock, Ogilvie), BC Cancer; Women’s Health Research Institute (Simkin, Smith, Caird, Ogilvie); Cancer Control Research (Smith, van Niekerk, Caron), BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Caird, Woods, Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; School of Nursing (Dearden), University of British Columbia; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (van der Hoek, Peacock); Centre for Excellence in Indigenous Health (Caron), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hannah Caird
School of Population and Public Health (Simkin, Caron, Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Cancer Control Research (Simkin, van der Hoek, Woods, Peacock, Ogilvie), BC Cancer; Women’s Health Research Institute (Simkin, Smith, Caird, Ogilvie); Cancer Control Research (Smith, van Niekerk, Caron), BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Caird, Woods, Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; School of Nursing (Dearden), University of British Columbia; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (van der Hoek, Peacock); Centre for Excellence in Indigenous Health (Caron), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tania Dearden
School of Population and Public Health (Simkin, Caron, Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Cancer Control Research (Simkin, van der Hoek, Woods, Peacock, Ogilvie), BC Cancer; Women’s Health Research Institute (Simkin, Smith, Caird, Ogilvie); Cancer Control Research (Smith, van Niekerk, Caron), BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Caird, Woods, Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; School of Nursing (Dearden), University of British Columbia; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (van der Hoek, Peacock); Centre for Excellence in Indigenous Health (Caron), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kimberly van der Hoek
School of Population and Public Health (Simkin, Caron, Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Cancer Control Research (Simkin, van der Hoek, Woods, Peacock, Ogilvie), BC Cancer; Women’s Health Research Institute (Simkin, Smith, Caird, Ogilvie); Cancer Control Research (Smith, van Niekerk, Caron), BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Caird, Woods, Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; School of Nursing (Dearden), University of British Columbia; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (van der Hoek, Peacock); Centre for Excellence in Indigenous Health (Caron), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nadine R. Caron
School of Population and Public Health (Simkin, Caron, Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Cancer Control Research (Simkin, van der Hoek, Woods, Peacock, Ogilvie), BC Cancer; Women’s Health Research Institute (Simkin, Smith, Caird, Ogilvie); Cancer Control Research (Smith, van Niekerk, Caron), BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Caird, Woods, Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; School of Nursing (Dearden), University of British Columbia; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (van der Hoek, Peacock); Centre for Excellence in Indigenous Health (Caron), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan R. Woods
School of Population and Public Health (Simkin, Caron, Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Cancer Control Research (Simkin, van der Hoek, Woods, Peacock, Ogilvie), BC Cancer; Women’s Health Research Institute (Simkin, Smith, Caird, Ogilvie); Cancer Control Research (Smith, van Niekerk, Caron), BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Caird, Woods, Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; School of Nursing (Dearden), University of British Columbia; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (van der Hoek, Peacock); Centre for Excellence in Indigenous Health (Caron), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stuart Peacock
School of Population and Public Health (Simkin, Caron, Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Cancer Control Research (Simkin, van der Hoek, Woods, Peacock, Ogilvie), BC Cancer; Women’s Health Research Institute (Simkin, Smith, Caird, Ogilvie); Cancer Control Research (Smith, van Niekerk, Caron), BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Caird, Woods, Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; School of Nursing (Dearden), University of British Columbia; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (van der Hoek, Peacock); Centre for Excellence in Indigenous Health (Caron), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gina Ogilvie
School of Population and Public Health (Simkin, Caron, Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Cancer Control Research (Simkin, van der Hoek, Woods, Peacock, Ogilvie), BC Cancer; Women’s Health Research Institute (Simkin, Smith, Caird, Ogilvie); Cancer Control Research (Smith, van Niekerk, Caron), BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Caird, Woods, Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; School of Nursing (Dearden), University of British Columbia; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (van der Hoek, Peacock); Centre for Excellence in Indigenous Health (Caron), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1:

    Age-standardized incidence rates of cervical cancer and number of new cases by year, 2004–2013. The dashed line shows the provincial cumulative age-standardized incidence rate, 2004–2013, the solid line shows the age-standardized incidence rate and the bars show counts of invasive cervical cancer cases. Note: HAF = health assessment form.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Data sources accessed for the study

    PopulationDatabaseDescriptionYears of data usedVariables used in analysis
    BC ICC casesBC Cancer RegistryA population-based registry of all cases of cancer diagnosed in BC residents since 1970. Data includes personal, geographic and tumour diagnosis information. Sociodemographic information is available only for cases seen in consultation at a BC Cancer clinic.2004–2013Age, geography
    BC HAFsHealth assessment forms are completed upon first admission to a BC Cancer centre. HAFs capture sociodemographic characteristics via a standardized questionnaire.HAF: 2004–2010
    PRISM: 2011–2013
    Self-reported ethnicity or race, language, smoking status, marital status
    General population of women in BCCanadian Census PUMF (individuals file)The Canadian Census of Population is a primary source of sociodemographic data in Canada and vital for government, community and planning services.21 The 2006 Census national response rate was 96.5%.22 The public use microdata file contains 844 476 records, representing 2.7% of the Canadian population. The file does not include people living in institutions.232006Self-reported age, ethnicity or race, language
    National Household Survey PUMF (individuals file)In 2011, the mandatory long-form census was replaced with a voluntary survey called the National Household Survey (NHS). The NHS collected similar information as gathered from the Census. The national response rate in 2011 was 77.2%.24 Statistics Canada implemented various methods to account for error and biases related to the voluntary nature of the survey.25 The 2011 NHS PUMF on individuals represents a 2.7% sample of the Canadian population. It contains social, demographic and economic data.262011Self-reported age, ethnicity or race, language
    CCHS PUMFThe CCHS is a national cross-sectional survey that collects health information and is conducted every 2 years by Statistics Canada. The survey uses multistage cluster sampling and collects data on “health and social characteristics of the population.” The CCHS PUMF provides data on a 2-year period. The response rate was 68.4%. Data are based on in-person and telephone interviews administered to participants, with about 130 000 respondents aged 12 years or older, residing in households in all provinces and territories. Data are not collected on members of the Canadian Armed Forces and those residing on First Nations reserves, in institutions and in some remote regions. Exclusions represent less than 3% of the Canadian population.272011/12 cycleSelf-reported smoking status, marital status
    BC Stats28Population statistics by BC geographical classifications. BC Stats provides population estimates by various levels of geography. Population estimates are based on the Census of Population with adjustments that consider net under-enumeration in the Census.292006, 2011Geography
    • Note: BCCR = BC Cancer Registry, CCHS = Canadian Community Health Survey, HAF = health assessment form, ICC = invasive cervical cancer, PRISM = Patient-Reported Information and Symptom Measurement, PUMF = public use microdata file.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Age distribution of invasive cervical cancer cases and general female population in British Columbia, 2004–2013

    Age group, yrBC Cancer ICC cases* (all cases in BC)
    No. (%)
    n = 1705
    BC Cancer ICC cases* (referred with complete HAFs)
    No. (%)
    n = 1215
    BC female population 18 yr and older† %
    18–2413 (0.8)5 (0.4)11.8
    25–2987 (5.1)40 (3.3)8.0
    30–34165 (9.7)92 (7.6)7.8
    35–39209 (12.3)154 (12.7)8.4
    40–44269 (15.8)188 (15.5)9.4
    45–49195 (11.4)145 (11.9)10.2
    50–54166 (9.7)123 (10.1)9.9
    55–59164 (9.6)124 (10.2)9.2
    60–64118 (6.9)94 (7.7)7.7
    65–6989 (5.2)78 (6.4)5.6
    70–7464 (3.8)47 (3.9)4.4
    75–7962 (3.6)50 (4.1)3.6
    80–8465 (3.8)48 (4.0)2.4
    ≥ 8539 (2.3)27 (2.3)1.5
    • Note: HAF = health assessment form, ICC = invasive cervical cancer.

    • ↵* Only ICC cases aged 18 years and older were considered.

    • ↵† Data for the BC female population aged 18 years and older were derived by adding weighted counts for each age group from the 2006 Census23 and 2011 NHS.26 To derive proportions, the weighted counts were divided by the total of weighted counts among ages 18 years and older.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Observed invasive cervical cancer cases by self-identified ethnicity or race and language most often spoken at home compared with expected cases relative to the general female population in British Columbia

    CategoryObserved cases (crude proportion, %)Census age-standardized weighted proportion, % (95% CI)Expected casesStandardized ratio (95% CI)*Test statistics, χ2†
    Ethnicity or race
    Overall, n = 111722.8¶
     Not a visible minority797 (71.3)77.3 (77.2–77.4)8640.92 (0.92–0.92)
     Visible minority320 (28.6)22.7 (22.6–22.7)2531.26 (1.26–1.26)
    Within not a visible minority, n = 79755.9¶
     White712 (89.3)95.1 (94.9–95.2)7580.94 (0.94–0.94)
     Indigenous85 (10.7)4.9 (4.9–5.0)392.16 (2.15–2.18)
    Within visible minority, n = 32038.8¶
     Chinese118 (36.9)35.4 (35.2–35.6)1131.04 (1.04–1.05)
     South Asian72 (22.5)35.9 (35.8–36.1)1150.63 (0.62–0.63)
     Filipino38 (11.9)7.4 (7.4–7.5)241.60 (1.58–1.62)
     Korean21 (6.6)3.7 (3.6–3.7)121.78 (1.76–1.80)
     Japanese17 (5.3)3.0 (3.0–3.1)101.77 (1.74–1.79)
     All other‡54 (16.9)14.5 (14.4–14.6)471.16 (1.15–1.17)
    Language
    Overall, n = 10811.2
     Official languages§901 (83.3)82.1 (82.0–82.2)8871.02 (1.01–1.02)
     Nonofficial languages180 (16.7)17.9 (17.9–18.0)1940.93 (0.93–0.93)
    Within nonofficial languages, n = 18012.6**
     Chinese languages80 (44.4)41.7 (41.5–41.9)751.07 (1.06–1.07)
     Punjabi45 (25.0)18.4 (18.3–18.6)331.36 (1.35–1.37)
     Other Indo-Iranian languages16 (8.9)6.9 (6.8–7.0)121.29 (1.28–1.31)
     All other languages39 (21.7)33.0 (32.8–33.2)590.66 (0.65–0.66)
    • Note: CI = confidence interval, ICC = invasive cervical cancer.

    • ↵* The standardized ratio was derived by dividing the observed and age-adjusted expected counts.

    • ↵† Goodness-of-fit testing the null of no differences between observed and expected values.

    • ↵‡ The population group “All other” includes various population groups that individually had less than 5 counts.

    • ↵§ The official languages include French and English.

    • ↵¶ p < 0.001.

    • ↵** p < 0.01.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Observed invasive cervical cancer cases by smoking status, marital status and community health service area urban–rural classification compared with expected cases relative to the general female population in British Columbia

    CategoryObserved cases (crude proportion, %)Census age-standardized weighted proportion, % (95% CI)Expected casesStandardized ratio* (95% CI)Test statistics, χ2†
    Smoking status, n = 119122.8‡
     Current smoker229 (19.2)14.4 (14.3–14.5)1721.34 (1.33–1.34)
     Former smoker429 (36.0)39.0 (38.9–39.1)4640.92 (0.92–0.93)
     Never smoker533 (44.8)46.6 (46.5–46.7)5550.96 (0.96–0.96)
    Marital status, n = 120326.2‡
     Married725 (60.3)67.2 (67.0–67.3)8080.90 (0.90–0.90)
     Widowed, separated or divorced289 (24.0)19.5 (19.4–19.6)2351.23 (1.23–1.24)
     Single189 (15.7)13.3 (13.3–13.4)1601.18 (1.17–1.18)
    CHSA classifications, n = 1683239.2‡
     Metro766 (45.5)50.5 (50.4–50.6)8500.90 (0.90–0.90)
     Large urban244 (14.5)15.1 (15.1–15.2)2550.96 (0.95–0.96)
     Medium urban240 (14.3)16.5 (16.5–16.6)2780.86 (0.86–0.87)
     Small urban130 (7.7)8.9 (8.9–9.0)1500.86 (0.86–0.87)
     Rural-hub87 (5.2)4.0 (4.0–4.0)671.29 (1.28–1.30)
     Rural or remote216 (12.8)4.9 (4.9–4.9)822.62 (2.61–2.64)
    • Note: CHSA = community health service area, CI = confidence interval, ICC = invasive cervical cancer.

    • ↵* The standardized ratio was derived by dividing the observed and age-adjusted expected counts.

    • ↵† Goodness-of-fit testing the null of no differences between observed and expected values.

    • ↵‡ p <0.001.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ Open: 9 (2)
Vol. 9, Issue 2
1 Apr 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sociodemographic characteristics of women with invasive cervical cancer in British Columbia, 2004–2013: a descriptive study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Sociodemographic characteristics of women with invasive cervical cancer in British Columbia, 2004–2013: a descriptive study
Jonathan Simkin, Laurie Smith, Dirk van Niekerk, Hannah Caird, Tania Dearden, Kimberly van der Hoek, Nadine R. Caron, Ryan R. Woods, Stuart Peacock, Gina Ogilvie
Apr 2021, 9 (2) E424-E432; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200139

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Sociodemographic characteristics of women with invasive cervical cancer in British Columbia, 2004–2013: a descriptive study
Jonathan Simkin, Laurie Smith, Dirk van Niekerk, Hannah Caird, Tania Dearden, Kimberly van der Hoek, Nadine R. Caron, Ryan R. Woods, Stuart Peacock, Gina Ogilvie
Apr 2021, 9 (2) E424-E432; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200139
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Clinical
    • Aboriginal Health
    • Women's Health
      • Cervical screening
    • Evidence-based Medicine
      • Diagnostic tests
    • Oncology
      • Gynecological Cancer
    • Obstetrics & Gynecology
      • Other obstetrics & gynecology
  • Nonclinical
    • Epidemiology
      • Screening tests
      • Socioeconomic determinants of health

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Preparing manuscripts
  • Manuscript Submission Checklist
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Editorial Process
  • Patient-Oriented Research
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Manuscript Progress
  • Submitting a letter
  • Information for Reviewers

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panel
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Media
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

View CMA's Accessibility policy.

 

Powered by HighWire