Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for Authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission Checklist
    • Publication Fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial Policies
    • Editorial Process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Manuscript Progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for Authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission Checklist
    • Publication Fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial Policies
    • Editorial Process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Manuscript Progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CMAJ Open on Twitter
Research
Open Access

Abortion services and providers in Canada in 2019: results of a national survey

Regina M. Renner, Madeleine Ennis, Damien Contandriopoulos, Edith Guilbert, Sheila Dunn, Janusz Kaczorowski, Elizabeth K. Darling, Arianne Albert, Claire Styffe and Wendy V. Norman
September 27, 2022 10 (3) E856-E864; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210232
Regina M. Renner
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Renner, Ennis), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Contraception and Abortion Research Team (Renner, Ennis, Contandriopoulos, Guilbert, Dunn, Kaczorowski, Darling, Albert, Styffe, Norman), Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; School of Nursing (Contandriopoulos), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproduction (Guilbert), Laval University, Québec City, Que.; Department of Family & Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Women’s College Research Institute (Dunn), Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Kaczorowski), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (Darling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; School of Population and Public Health (Styffe) and Department of Family Practice (Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Public Health and Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Madeleine Ennis
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Renner, Ennis), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Contraception and Abortion Research Team (Renner, Ennis, Contandriopoulos, Guilbert, Dunn, Kaczorowski, Darling, Albert, Styffe, Norman), Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; School of Nursing (Contandriopoulos), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproduction (Guilbert), Laval University, Québec City, Que.; Department of Family & Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Women’s College Research Institute (Dunn), Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Kaczorowski), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (Darling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; School of Population and Public Health (Styffe) and Department of Family Practice (Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Public Health and Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damien Contandriopoulos
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Renner, Ennis), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Contraception and Abortion Research Team (Renner, Ennis, Contandriopoulos, Guilbert, Dunn, Kaczorowski, Darling, Albert, Styffe, Norman), Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; School of Nursing (Contandriopoulos), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproduction (Guilbert), Laval University, Québec City, Que.; Department of Family & Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Women’s College Research Institute (Dunn), Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Kaczorowski), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (Darling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; School of Population and Public Health (Styffe) and Department of Family Practice (Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Public Health and Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edith Guilbert
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Renner, Ennis), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Contraception and Abortion Research Team (Renner, Ennis, Contandriopoulos, Guilbert, Dunn, Kaczorowski, Darling, Albert, Styffe, Norman), Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; School of Nursing (Contandriopoulos), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproduction (Guilbert), Laval University, Québec City, Que.; Department of Family & Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Women’s College Research Institute (Dunn), Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Kaczorowski), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (Darling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; School of Population and Public Health (Styffe) and Department of Family Practice (Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Public Health and Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sheila Dunn
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Renner, Ennis), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Contraception and Abortion Research Team (Renner, Ennis, Contandriopoulos, Guilbert, Dunn, Kaczorowski, Darling, Albert, Styffe, Norman), Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; School of Nursing (Contandriopoulos), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproduction (Guilbert), Laval University, Québec City, Que.; Department of Family & Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Women’s College Research Institute (Dunn), Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Kaczorowski), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (Darling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; School of Population and Public Health (Styffe) and Department of Family Practice (Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Public Health and Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janusz Kaczorowski
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Renner, Ennis), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Contraception and Abortion Research Team (Renner, Ennis, Contandriopoulos, Guilbert, Dunn, Kaczorowski, Darling, Albert, Styffe, Norman), Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; School of Nursing (Contandriopoulos), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproduction (Guilbert), Laval University, Québec City, Que.; Department of Family & Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Women’s College Research Institute (Dunn), Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Kaczorowski), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (Darling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; School of Population and Public Health (Styffe) and Department of Family Practice (Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Public Health and Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth K. Darling
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Renner, Ennis), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Contraception and Abortion Research Team (Renner, Ennis, Contandriopoulos, Guilbert, Dunn, Kaczorowski, Darling, Albert, Styffe, Norman), Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; School of Nursing (Contandriopoulos), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproduction (Guilbert), Laval University, Québec City, Que.; Department of Family & Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Women’s College Research Institute (Dunn), Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Kaczorowski), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (Darling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; School of Population and Public Health (Styffe) and Department of Family Practice (Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Public Health and Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arianne Albert
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Renner, Ennis), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Contraception and Abortion Research Team (Renner, Ennis, Contandriopoulos, Guilbert, Dunn, Kaczorowski, Darling, Albert, Styffe, Norman), Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; School of Nursing (Contandriopoulos), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproduction (Guilbert), Laval University, Québec City, Que.; Department of Family & Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Women’s College Research Institute (Dunn), Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Kaczorowski), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (Darling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; School of Population and Public Health (Styffe) and Department of Family Practice (Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Public Health and Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claire Styffe
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Renner, Ennis), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Contraception and Abortion Research Team (Renner, Ennis, Contandriopoulos, Guilbert, Dunn, Kaczorowski, Darling, Albert, Styffe, Norman), Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; School of Nursing (Contandriopoulos), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproduction (Guilbert), Laval University, Québec City, Que.; Department of Family & Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Women’s College Research Institute (Dunn), Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Kaczorowski), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (Darling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; School of Population and Public Health (Styffe) and Department of Family Practice (Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Public Health and Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wendy V. Norman
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Renner, Ennis), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Contraception and Abortion Research Team (Renner, Ennis, Contandriopoulos, Guilbert, Dunn, Kaczorowski, Darling, Albert, Styffe, Norman), Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; School of Nursing (Contandriopoulos), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproduction (Guilbert), Laval University, Québec City, Que.; Department of Family & Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Women’s College Research Institute (Dunn), Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family and Emergency Medicine (Kaczorowski), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (Darling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; School of Population and Public Health (Styffe) and Department of Family Practice (Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Public Health and Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1:

    Respondent flow chart, informed by the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES).25 *Consent statement views recorded on Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) platform.32 †The participation rate was 95.1%. ‡Per programming in REDCap, respondents who did not answer mandatory inclusion criteria questions correctly were automatically exited from the survey. This included a question confirming that they had not taken the survey before. §Manual removal of respondents who exited the survey before completing mandatory eligibility questions. ¶Duplicate analysis was conducted using R Statistical software, flagging matching demographics, followed by manual review of all flagged respondents. We did not collect Internet Protocol addresses or use cookies, as per our research ethics board request, to maintain respondent anonymity. **Of 465 respondents, 323 (69.5%) completed the survey, defined as completing the last survey section.

  • Figure 2:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2:

    Respondents’ abortion clinical practice location and range of health care services provided at that location by type of abortion service. Note: Respondents indicated location and other types of care for each abortion service they provided.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Characteristics of abortion provider respondents by specialty

    CharacteristicNo. (%) of respondents*
    Primary care providers†
    n = 280
    General obstetrician–gynecologists
    n = 145
    Maternal–fetal medicine subspecialists
    n = 40
    Total
    n = 465
    Region‡
     British Columbia61 (21.8)21 (14.5)9 (22.5)91 (19.6)
     Prairies39 (13.9)13 (9.0)< 5§
     Ontario99 (35.4)42 (29.0)12 (30.0)153 (32.9)
     Quebec41 (14.6)54 (37.2)12 (30.0)107 (23.0)
     Atlantic provinces28 (10.0)14 (9.7)< 5§
     Territories12 (4.3)< 50§
    Gender
     Men36 (12.9)22 (15.2)12 (30.0)70 (15.1)
     Women244 (87.1)123 (84.8)28 (70.0)395 (84.9)
     Other0000
    Age, yr
     < 40123 (46.2)60 (43.5)< 5§
     40–4976 (28.6)42 (30.4)17 (48.6)135 (30.8)
     ≥5067 (25.2)36 (26.1)14 (40.0)117 (26.7)
    Type of abortion care¶
     First-trimester medical abortion275 (98.2)105 (72.4)8 (20.0)388 (83.4)
     First-trimester surgical abortion82 (29.3)125 (86.2)12 (30.0)219 (47.1)
     Second-trimester surgical abortion36 (12.9)63 (43.4)10 (25.0)109 (23.4)
     Second- or third-trimester medical abortion9 (3.2)66 (45.5)39 (97.5)115 (24.7)
    Type of abortion care combinations¶
     Exclusively first-trimester medical abortion196 (70.0)11 (7.6)0207 (44.5)
     First-trimester medical abortion and surgical abortion78 (27.9)88 (60.7)6 (15.0)172 (37.0)
     First- and second-trimester surgical abortion36 (12.9)62 (42.8)8 (20.0)106 (22.8)
     Exclusively second- or third-trimester medical abortion< 5< 524 (60.0)§
    Number of abortions
     First-trimester medical abortion9587 (27.8)3669 (29.9)173 (10.1)13429 (27.7)
     First-trimester surgical abortion23890 (69.2)7336 (59.8)1119 (65.6)32345 (66.7)
     Second-trimester surgical abortion1059 (3.1)1039 (8.5)83 (4.9)2181 (4.5)
     Second- or third-trimester medical abortion< 5218 (1.4)332 (13.0)§
     Total3454012262170748509
    Following national clinical abortion practice guidelines¶
     SOGC242 (92.0)131 (98.4)37 (100.0)411 (94.8)
     NAF122 (46.6)48 (36.1)5 (13.5)167 (40.6)
     Other7 (2.7)< 5< 5§
     Missing16 (5.7)12 (8.3)< 5§
    Experience with first-trimester medical abortion, yr
     < 5171 (64.5)48 (52.7)< 5§
     5–1040 (15.1)19 (20.9)< 5§
     11–1528 (10.6)13 (14.3)< 5§
     16–2012 (4.5)7 (7.7)019 (5.2)
     > 2014 (5.3)< 5< 5§
    Years of abortion experience**
     < 5160 (59.3)41 (31.8)8 (20.5)209 (47.7)
     5–1041 (15.2)26 (20.2)9 (23.1)76 (17.4)
     11–1529 (10.7)24 (18.6)8 (20.5)61 (13.9)
     16–2012 (4.4)16 (12.4)< 5§
     > 2028 (10.4)22 (17.1)10 (25.6)60 (13.7)
    Focus††, %, median (IQR)15 (5–30)10 (5–20)5 (5–10)10 (5–20)
    • Note: IQR = interquartile range, NAF = National Abortion Federation, SOGC = The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

    • ↵* Percentages were calculated based on the total number of respondents for the individual variable (based on skip-pattern logic and nonmandatory questions). The denominator for each reported percentage consists of the number of respondents who answered that question.

    • ↵† To maintain respondent anonymity, we grouped family physicians, emergency medicine physicians and nurse practitioners into a “primary care provider” category when reporting results by specialty. Primary care providers include 246 family physicians, fewer than 5 emergency medicine physicians, and 30 nurse practitioners.

    • ↵‡ To maintain respondent anonymity, we reported geographic results by regions (British Columbia, the Prairies, Ontario, Quebec, the Atlantic provinces and the territories), combining some provinces with low respondent numbers. Prairies include Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Atlantic provinces includes New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Prince Edward Island. Territories includes the Northwest Territories, Yukon and Nunavut.

    • ↵§ Totals not reported to maintain respondents’ anonymity.

    • ↵¶ Respondents could select more than 1 answer option.

    • ↵** Years of experience in abortion care was based on the highest reported value within the survey (as respondents indicated years of experience for each type of provision).

    • ↵†† Proportion of respondent practice focused on abortion and contraception care.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Characteristics of abortion providers by region

    CharacteristicNo. (%) of respondents*†
    British Columbia
    n = 91
    Prairies
    n = 56
    Ontario
    n = 153
    Quebec
    n = 107
    Atlantic provinces
    n = 45
    Territories
    n = 13
    Type of abortion care‡
     First-trimester medical abortion78 (85.7)50 (89.3)136 (88.9)72 (67.3)40 (88.9)12 (92.3)
     First-trimester surgical abortion37 (40.7)24 (42.9)50 (32.7)84 (78.5)17 (37.8)7 (53.8)
     Second-trimester surgical abortion10 (11.0)16 (28.6)26 (17.0)42 (39.3)9 (20.0)6 (46.2)
     Second- or third-trimester medical abortion18 (19.8)15 (26.8)29 (19.0)42 (39.3)9 (20.0)< 5
     Exclusive first-trimester medical abortion46 (50.5)30 (53.6)91 (59.5)11 (10.3)24 (53.3)5 (38.5)
     First-trimester medical abortion and first- trimester surgical abortion31 (34.1)20 (35.7)42 (27.5)57 (53.3)15 (33.3)7 (53.8)
    Number of abortions
     First-trimester medical abortion4043 (40.7)1860 (27.8)4410 (34.9)1918 (12.5)1070 (30.7)128 (28.1)
     First-trimester surgical abortion5210 (52.5)4347 (65.0)7674 (60.8)12 624 (82.3)2192 (62.9)298 (65.4)
     Second-trimester surgical abortion575 (5.8)459 (6.9)339 (2.7)614 (4.0)165 (4.7)29 (6.4)
     Second- or third-trimester medical abortion99 (0.1)18 (0.3)200 (1.6)178 (1.2)58 (1.6)< 5
     Total9927668412623153343485456
    National clinical abortion practice guidelines†
     SOGC84 (92.3)52 (94.5)136 (93.2)105 (94.6)49 (98.0)9 (64.3)
     NAF46 (51.7)26 (47.3)58 (39.7)33 (29.7)24 (48.0)10 (71.4)
     Other< 5< 5< 59 (8.1)00
     Missing< 5< 57 (4.6)< 50< 5
    • Note: NAF = National Abortion Federation, SOGC = The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

    • ↵* Unless indicated otherwise. Percentages were calculated based on the total number of respondents for the individual variable (based on skip-pattern logic and nonmandatory questions). The denominator for each reported percentage consists of the number of respondents who answered that question.

    • ↵† To maintain respondent anonymity, we report geographic results by region (British Columbia, the Prairies, Ontario, Quebec, the Atlantic provinces and the territories), combining some provinces with low respondent numbers. Prairies include Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Atlantic provinces includes New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Prince Edward Island. Territories includes the Northwest Territories, Yukon and Nunavut.

    • ↵‡ Respondents could select more than 1 answer option.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Characteristics of abortion providers by rural or urban practice location

    CharacteristicNo. (%) of respondents*
    Rural
    n = 178
    Urban
    n = 279
    Type of abortion care†
     First-trimester medical abortion165 (92.7)218 (78.1)
     Exclusively first-trimester medical abortion100 (56.2)106 (38.0)
     First-trimester surgical abortion73 (41.0)142 (50.9)
     Second-trimester surgical abortion21 (11.8)87 (31.2)
     Second- or third-trimester medical abortion23 (12.9)88 (31.5)
    No. (%) of abortions
     First-trimester medical abortion2334 (44.4)11067 (25.6)
     First-trimester surgical abortion2724 (51.8)29578 (68.5)
     Second-trimester surgical abortion167 (3.2)2014 (4.7)
     Second- or third-trimester medical abortion34 (0.6)508 (1.2)
     Total525943 167
    Region‡
     British Columbia53 (29.8)38 (13.6)
     Prairies17 (9.6)38 (13.6)
     Ontario36 (20.2112 (40.1)
     Quebec38 (21.3)68 (24.4)
     Atlantic provinces21 (11.8)23 (8.2)
     Territories13 (7.3)0
    • Note: MA = medical abortion.

    • ↵* Unless indicated otherwise. Percentages were calculated based on the total number of respondents for the individual variable (based on skip-pattern logic and nonmandatory questions). The denominator for each reported percentage consists of the number of respondents who answered that question. We defined urban providers as those located within Statistics Canada’s defined census metropolitan areas.35 All other providers were classified as rural.

    • ↵† Respondents could select more than 1 answer option.

    • ↵‡ To maintain respondent anonymity, we reported geographic results by regions (British Columbia, the Prairies, Ontario, Quebec, the Atlantic provinces and the territories), combining some provinces with low respondent numbers. Prairies include Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Atlantic provinces include New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Prince Edward Island. Territories includes the Northwest Territories, Yukon and Nunavut.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ Open: 10 (3)
Vol. 10, Issue 3
1 Sep 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Abortion services and providers in Canada in 2019: results of a national survey
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Abortion services and providers in Canada in 2019: results of a national survey
Regina M. Renner, Madeleine Ennis, Damien Contandriopoulos, Edith Guilbert, Sheila Dunn, Janusz Kaczorowski, Elizabeth K. Darling, Arianne Albert, Claire Styffe, Wendy V. Norman
Sep 2022, 10 (3) E856-E864; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210232

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Abortion services and providers in Canada in 2019: results of a national survey
Regina M. Renner, Madeleine Ennis, Damien Contandriopoulos, Edith Guilbert, Sheila Dunn, Janusz Kaczorowski, Elizabeth K. Darling, Arianne Albert, Claire Styffe, Wendy V. Norman
Sep 2022, 10 (3) E856-E864; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210232
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Clinical
    • Obstetrics & Gynecology
      • Drugs
      • Maternal-fetal medicine
      • Other obstetrics & gynecology
    • Health services research
    • Family Medicine, General Practice, Primary Care
      • Other family medicine
    • Drugs
      • Regulation
  • Nonclinical
    • Nursing (includes nurse practitioners)

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Preparing manuscripts
  • Manuscript Submission Checklist
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Editorial Process
  • Patient-Oriented Research
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Manuscript Progress
  • Submitting a letter
  • Information for Reviewers

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Media
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

View CMA's Accessibility policy.

 

Powered by HighWire