Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for Authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission Checklist
    • Publication Fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial Policies
    • Editorial Process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Manuscript Progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for Authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission Checklist
    • Publication Fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial Policies
    • Editorial Process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Manuscript Progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CMAJ Open on Twitter
Research
Open Access

Family presence in Canadian PICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods environmental scan of policy and practice

Jennifer Ruth Foster, Laurie A. Lee, Jamie A. Seabrook, Molly Ryan, Laura J. Betts, Stacy A. Burgess, Corey Slumkoski, Martha Walls and Daniel Garros; for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
July 05, 2022 10 (3) E622-E632; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210202
Jennifer Ruth Foster
Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children’s Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children’s Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children’s Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurie A. Lee
Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children’s Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children’s Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children’s Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jamie A. Seabrook
Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children’s Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children’s Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children’s Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Molly Ryan
Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children’s Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children’s Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children’s Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura J. Betts
Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children’s Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children’s Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children’s Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stacy A. Burgess
Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children’s Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children’s Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children’s Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Corey Slumkoski
Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children’s Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children’s Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children’s Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martha Walls
Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children’s Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children’s Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children’s Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Garros
Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children’s Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children’s Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children’s Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1:

    Stated reasons for granting exceptions to restrictions, where an exception was an increase in the number of family members present at a single time, or increased frequency of switches (n = 24 respondents).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Characteristics of Canadian PICUs (n = 19)*

    CharacteristicNo. (%)
    Hospital type
     Stand-alone children’s hospital5 (26)
     Children’s health unit in a larger, mixed hospital11 (58)
     Women and children’s hospital3 (16)
    PICU type
     Medical–surgical11 (58)
      Level 2 medical–surgical†2 (11)
     Cardiac2 (11)
     Mixed medical–surgical–cardiac6 (32)
    No. of beds
     < 105 (26)
     10–1910 (53)
     ≥ 204 (21)
    Ages admitted, yr
     Birth to 162 (11)
     Birth to 173 (16)
     Birth to 1814 (74)
    • Note: PICU = pediatric intensive care unit.

    • ↵* Information provided by respondents from each PICU.

    • ↵† Units providing single-organ support and short-term invasive mechanical ventilation only.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Family presence policies early in the COVID-19 pandemic (March–May 2020) for all Canadian PICUs — results of literature search*

    Hospital, city, provincePolicy information sourceDocument type(s)No. of people at bedsideSwitching practice to enable second parent or support†Approach to minor-age siblingsApproach to other non-parent family and visitors‡Response to family or visitors with infectious symptoms or risk§In-hospital mobility¶
    Patients without SARS-CoV-2 infectionPatients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Janeway Children’s Health and Rehabilitation Centre, St. John’s, Newfoundland and LabradorHealth authorityWebsite, social mediaNSNSNSNot allowed or only at end of lifeNot allowedNSNS
    IWK Health, Halifax, Nova ScotiaHospitalWebsite1NSNSNot allowed or only at end of lifeNSScreenedNS
    CHU de Québec–Université Laval, Québec City, QuebecHospitalWebsite1NSNSNot allowed or only at end of lifeNot allowedNSNS
    CIUSSS de l’Estrie–CHU Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QuebecHealth authorityWebsiteNSNSNSNSNSNot allowedNS
    Montreal Children’s Hospital; Montréal, QuebecHospitalWebsite2 (strict)NSUnnecessaryNot allowed or only at end of lifeNot allowedNSNS
    CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QuebecHospitalWebsite2 (strict)NSUnnecessaryNot allowed or only at end of lifeNot allowedNot allowedNS
    Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, OntarioHospitalOriginal policy, websiteNSNSNSNot allowed or only at end of lifeNot allowedScreenedNS
    Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, OntarioHospitalWebsite2 (strict)NSRestricted times or frequenciesNot allowed or only at end of lifeNot allowedScreenedNS
    The Hospital for Sick Children, cardiac, Toronto, OntarioHospitalWebsite1NSNSNot allowed or only at end of lifeNot allowedScreenedNS
    The Hospital for Sick Children, medical–surgical, Toronto, OntarioHospitalWebsite1NSNSNot allowed or only at end of lifeNot allowedScreenedNS
    McMaster Children’s Hospital, Hamilton, OntarioHospitalWebsiteNS1NSNSNSNSNS
    Children’s Hospital–London Health Sciences Centre, London, OntarioHospitalNews release1NSNSNot allowed or only at end of lifeNot allowedNot allowedNS
    Children’s Hospital–Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, ManitobaHospitalWebsite1NSNSAt manager’s discretionNSNSNS
    Jim Pattison Children’s Hospital, Saskatoon, SaskatchewanHealth authorityOriginal policy, website, news release, poster11Not allowedNot allowed or only at end of lifeNot allowedNot allowedNot allowed to leave PICU room
    Stollery Children’s Hospital, cardiac, Edmonton, AlbertaHealth authorityOriginal policy, websiteNSNSNSNot allowed or only at end of lifeNSNot allowedNS
    Stollery Children’s Hospital, medical–surgical, Edmonton, AlbertaHealth authorityOriginal policy, websiteNSNSNSNot allowed or only at end of lifeNSNot allowedNS
    Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, AlbertaHealth authorityOriginal policy, websiteNSNSNSNot allowed or only at end of lifeNSNot allowedNS
    BC Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, British ColumbiaHospitalWebsite2 (strict)NSUnnecessaryNot allowed or only at end of lifeNSScreenedNS
    Victoria General Hospital, Victoria, British ColumbiaHealth authorityWebsite11Restricted times or frequenciesNot allowed or only at end of lifeNSNot allowedNS
    No. not specified (%)––7 (37)16 (84)13 (68)2 (11)9 (47)5 (26)18 (95)
    • Note: NS = not specified, PICU = pediatric intensive care unit.

    • For full data, see Appendix 4, available at www.cmajopen.ca/content/10/3/E622/suppl/DC1.

    • ↵* Abstracted and abbreviated from publicly accessible documents.

    • † Refers to a PICU or hospital practice in which the number at the bedside is limited to enable 1 caregiver to leave and be replaced by a different caregiver. In this table, switches were designated as “unnecessary” if both parents or 2 caregivers could be present at the same time.

    • ↵† Including siblings over age 18 years.

    • ↵§ Including respiratory infectious symptoms or suspected SARS-CoV-2. ”Screened” indicates that family members were screened for infection, without indication of the action taken if a visitor screened positive.

    • ↵¶ Refers to whether caregivers were allowed to leave the PICU room and move around the hospital for any reason, including accessing basic needs.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    PICU family presence policies — survey responses (n = 24)*

    Family presence policyNo. (%) of respondents
    Before the pandemicMarch 2020August–December 2020
    Patients without SARS-CoV-2 infectionPatients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infectionPatients without SARS-CoV-2 infectionPatients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Shared policies between PICU and all pediatric care areas
     Yes11 (46)20 (83)
     No7 (29)3 (13)
     Unsure6 (25)1 (4)
     Agreement, no. of pairs (% agreement)†2 (50)5 (100)
    No. of support people at bedside
     10 (0)21 (88)23 (96)5 (21)12 (50)
     2 (strict)8 (33)3 (13)1 (4)19 (79)12 (50)
     2 (flexible)11 (46)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
     Unlimited5 (21)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
     Agreement, no. of pairs (% agreement)‡5 (0)5 (80)5 (100)5 (100)5 (60)
    Switches to enable other parent’s presence§
     Unnecessary (multiple visitors permitted)24 (100)3 (13)1 (4)19 (79)12 (50)
     Not allowed0 (0)7 (30)13 (57)0 (0)3 (13)
     Any time0 (0)4 (17)2 (9)1 (4)2 (8)
     Restricted times or frequencies0 (0)9 (39)7 (30)4 (17)7 (29)
     Agreement, no. of pairs (% agreement)‡5 (100)4 (50)4 (75)5 (100)5 (40)
    Timing of parental presence
     24/713 (54)19 (79)22 (92)20 (83)23 (96)
     Parents always allowed, but only 1 may stay if sleeping6 (25)2 (8)1 (4)2 (8)1 (4)
     Parents must leave overnight2 (8)1 (4)1 (4)0 (0)0 (0)
     Parents must leave during rounds or handover3 (13)2 (8)0 (0)2 (8)0 (0)
     Agreement, no. of pairs (% agreement)‡5 (80)4 (80)5 (100)5 (80)5 (100)
    Nonparent family members and visitors may switch into bedside¶
     Unnecessary (family and visitors unlimited)6 (25)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
     Not allowed0 (0)23 (96)23 (96)15 (65)19 (83)
     Any time12 (50)0 (0)0 (0)3 (13)0 (0)
     Restricted times or frequencies6 (25)1 (4)1 (4)5 (22)4 (17)
     Agreement, no. of pairs (% agreement)‡5 (60)5 (100)5 (100)4 (50)4 (50)
    Sibling presence
     Unrestricted12 (50)0 (0)0 (0)1 (4)0 (0)
     Not allowed, or only at end of life1 (4)24 (100)24 (100)17 (71)23 (96)
     With restrictions (e.g., time, duration, age)9 (38)0 (0)0 (0)6 (25)1 (4)
     At RN discretion2 (8)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
     Agreement, no. of pairs (% agreement)‡5 (80)5 (100)5 (100)5 (100)5 (100)
    • Note: PICU = pediatric intensive care unit, RN = registered nurse.

    • ↵* Unless otherwise indicated.

    • ↵† Physician chief and operations manager pairs from the same unit who did not indicate “unsure.”

    • ↵‡ Physician chief and operations manager pairs from the same unit for which both provided an answer to the given variable.

    • ↵§ Early pandemic: n = 23.

    • ↵¶ Mid-pandemic: n = 23.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    PICU family presence practices — survey responses (n = 24)*

    Family presence practiceNo. (%) of respondents
    Before the pandemicMarch 2020August–December 2020
    Patients without SARS-CoV-2 infectionPatients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infectionPatients without SARS-CoV-2 infectionPatients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Rounds practices†
     In-person24 (100)13 (59)5 (23)21 (95)7 (33)
     Virtual or telephone0 (0)5 (23)8 (36)1 (5)7 (33)
     Nonparticipation0 (0)4 (18)9 (41)0 (0)7 (33)
     Agreement, no. of pairs (% agreement)‡5 (100)3 (66)3 (33)4 (100)3 (66)
    Rounds location§
     Adjacent to room (e.g., bedside)24 (100)17 (74)16 (70)22 (100)21 (100)
     Distant location (e.g., conference room)0 (0)6 (26)7 (30)0 (0)0 (0)
     Agreement, no. of pairs (% agreement)‡5 (100)4 (100)4 (75)4 (75)3(100)
    Ability to leave PICU room¶
     Unrestricted24 (100)17 (71)0 (0)––
     Not allowed to leave0 (0)0 (0)7 (29)––
     Restricted: toilet0 (0)1 (4)11 (46)––
     Restricted: stress/procedures0 (0)0 (0)4 (17)––
     Restricted: eating0 (0)0 (0)2 (8)––
     Encouraged not to leave room, not mandated0 (0)6 (25)3 (13)––
     Agreement, no. of pairs (% agreement)‡5 (100)5 (100)5 (80)––
    Ability to leave hospital¶
     Unrestricted24 (100)21 (88)3 (13)––
     Restricted frequency (e.g., once per shift, once per day)0 (0)0 (0)4 (17)––
     Restricted: smoking0 (0)1 (4)5 (21)––
     Restricted: switches0 (0)2 (8)7 (29)––
     Never0 (0)1 (4)8 (33)––
     Agreement, no. of pairs (% agreement)‡5 (100)5 (80)5 (60)––
    • Note: PICU = pediatric intensive care unit.

    • ↵* Unless otherwise indicated.

    • ↵† Early pandemic: n = 22; mid-pandemic: n = 22 respondents for patients who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2, n = 21 for patients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection.

    • ↵‡ Physician chief and operations manager pairs from the same unit for which both provided an answer to the given variable.

    • ↵§ Early pandemic: n = 23; mid-pandemic: n = 22 for patients who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2; n = 21 for patients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection.

    • ↵¶ Respondents could indicate more than 1 reason for leaving (e.g., toilet, eating, switches and smoking).

    • View popup
    Table 5:

    Approach to policy exceptions and decision-making authority — survey responses (n = 24)

    FactorNo. (%) of respondents
    Approach to policy exceptions*
     Exceptions enabled by policy10 (42)
     Processes understood but not formalized4 (17)
     No initial policy or process, but developed over study period7 (29)
     No policy3 (13)
     Agreement, no. of pairs (% agreement)†5 (100)
    Decision-making authority
     PICU (physician, manager or charge nurse)9 (38)
     Hospital director8 (33)
     Infection prevention and control or emergency operations6 (25)
     Hospital executive1 (4)
     Agreement, no. of pairs (% agreement)†5 (40)
    • Note: PICU = pediatric intensive care unit.

    • ↵* Exceptions referred to enabling deviation from policy in certain circumstances. Examples of exceptions were: allowing more people at the bedside; allowing siblings; allowing more frequent switches of parents or other family members.

    • ↵† Physician chief and operations manager pairs from the same unit for which both provided an answer to the given variable.

    • View popup
    Table 6:

    PICU in-room masking requirements and screening for parents and support people — survey responses (n = 24)

    FactorNo. (%) of respondents
    March 2020August–December 2020
    Patients without SARS-CoV-2 infectionPatients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infectionPatients without SARS-CoV-2 infectionPatients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Masking in patient room
     Always4 (17)11 (46)10 (42)15 (62)
     Never17 (71)11 (46)8 (33)3 (12)
     When a health care provider is present2 (8)2 (8)6 (25)6 (25)
     If child is infectious1 (4)NA0 (0)NA
     Agreement, no. of pairs (% agreement)*5 (80)5 (100)5 (80)5 (80)
    SARS-CoV-2 screening for parents and support people†
     Preadmission questionnaire20 (83)–––
     Hospital or PICU entry screening questionnaire20 (83)–––
     Daily PICU symptom screening8 (33)–––
     Temperature check3 (13)–––
     Admission swab1 (4)–––
     Agreement, no. of pairs (% agreement)*5 (60)–––
    • Note: NA = not applicable, PICU = pediatric intensive care unit.

    • ↵* Physician chief and operations manager pairs from the same unit for which both provided an answer to the given variable.

    • ↵† Respondents could choose more than 1 screening method.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ Open: 10 (3)
Vol. 10, Issue 3
1 Sep 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Family presence in Canadian PICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods environmental scan of policy and practice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Family presence in Canadian PICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods environmental scan of policy and practice
Jennifer Ruth Foster, Laurie A. Lee, Jamie A. Seabrook, Molly Ryan, Laura J. Betts, Stacy A. Burgess, Corey Slumkoski, Martha Walls, Daniel Garros
Jul 2022, 10 (3) E622-E632; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210202

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Family presence in Canadian PICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods environmental scan of policy and practice
Jennifer Ruth Foster, Laurie A. Lee, Jamie A. Seabrook, Molly Ryan, Laura J. Betts, Stacy A. Burgess, Corey Slumkoski, Martha Walls, Daniel Garros
Jul 2022, 10 (3) E622-E632; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210202
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Clinical
    • Infectious Diseases
      • COVID-19
    • Pediatrics
      • Other pediatrics
    • Critical Care, Intensive Care
      • Pediatric
  • Nonclinical
    • Health Policy
      • Other health policy
    • Patients
      • Patient-caregiver relationships

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Preparing manuscripts
  • Manuscript Submission Checklist
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Editorial Process
  • Patient-Oriented Research
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Manuscript Progress
  • Submitting a letter
  • Information for Reviewers

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Media
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

View CMA's Accessibility policy.

 

Powered by HighWire