The numbered treaties and the politics of incoherency

G Starblanket - Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue …, 2019 - cambridge.org
G Starblanket
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 2019cambridge.org
This article explores the role of the numbered treaties relative to the continuity of the settler
colonial project in Canada. Although the treaties are often invoked to characterize the
federal government's commitment toward strengthening or renewing its relationship with
Indigenous peoples at a symbolic level, there remains a disjuncture between the “nation-to-
nation” depictions of treaties and the complex political relationships that Indigenous peoples
have called for since their signing. This article explores the inconsistent ways in which …
This article explores the role of the numbered treaties relative to the continuity of the settler colonial project in Canada. Although the treaties are often invoked to characterize the federal government's commitment toward strengthening or renewing its relationship with Indigenous peoples at a symbolic level, there remains a disjuncture between the “nation-to-nation” depictions of treaties and the complex political relationships that Indigenous peoples have called for since their signing. This article explores the inconsistent ways in which treaties have been taken up within Canadian legal and political institutions, arguing that the incoherency surrounding treaties promulgates the notion that treaties are being implemented while simultaneously obscuring, distorting and minimizing the rights of Indigenous peoples in practice. It demonstrates that the failure to engage with treaties as the locus of Indigenous peoples’ distinct political relationship with the Canadian state functions to continually produce conditions of colonization and dispossession through the denial of Indigenous sovereignty and jurisdiction as affirmed in treaties.
Cambridge University Press