Similar articles for PMID: 33888549

Year	Number of Results
2007	2
2009	3
2010	2
2011	3
2012	1
2013	5
2014	10
2015	8
2016	13
2017	12
2018	19
2019	24
2020	21
2021	27
2022	24
2023	9
2024	0

1

The cost-effectiveness of adding tomosynthesis to mammography-based breast cancer screening: an economic analysis.

Cressman S, Mar C, Sam J, Kan L, Lohrisch C, Spinelli JJ. Cressman S, et al. CMAJ Open. 2021 Apr 22;9(2):E443-E450. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200154. Print 2021 Apr-Jun. CMAJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33888549 Free PMC article.

2

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Hologic 3D Mammography Selenia Dimensions System for Use in Breast Cancer Screening: A Single Technology Assessment [Internet].

Movik E, Dalsbø TK, Fagelund BC, Friberg EG, Håheim LL, Skår Å. Movik E, et al. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. PMID: 29553669 Free Books & Documents. Review.

3

The cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis in a population breast cancer screening program.

Wang J, Phi XA, Greuter MJW, Daszczuk AM, Feenstra TL, Pijnappel RM, Vermeulen KM, Buls N, Houssami N, Lu W, de Bock GH. Wang J, et al. Eur Radiol. 2020 Oct;30(10):5437-5445. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06812-x. Epub 2020 May 7. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32382844 Free PMC article.

4

Long-Term Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in the United States.

Lowry KP, Trentham-Dietz A, Schechter CB, Alagoz O, Barlow WE, Burnside ES, Conant EF, Hampton JM, Huang H, Kerlikowske K, Lee SJ, Miglioretti DL, Sprague BL, Tosteson ANA, Yaffe MJ, Stout NK. Lowry KP, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Jun 1;112(6):582-589. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz184. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020. PMID: 31503283 Free PMC article.

5

Cost differences between digital tomosynthesis and standard digital mammography in a breast cancer screening programme: results from the To-Be trial in Norway.

Moger TA, Swanson JO, Holen ÅS, Hanestad B, Hofvind S. Moger TA, et al. Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Nov;20(8):1261-1269. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01094-7. Epub 2019 Aug 9. Eur J Health Econ. 2019. PMID: 31399773 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

6

Cost-effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Population-based Breast Cancer Screening: A Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis.

Sankatsing VDV, Juraniec K, Grimm SE, Joore MA, Pijnappel RM, de Koning HJ, van Ravesteyn NT. Sankatsing VDV, et al. Radiology. 2020 Oct;297(1):40-48. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192505. Epub 2020 Aug 4. Radiology. 2020. PMID: 32749212 Free PMC article.

7

Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.

Lowry KP, Coley RY, Miglioretti DL, Kerlikowske K, Henderson LM, Onega T, Sprague BL, Lee JM, Herschorn S, Tosteson ANA, Rauscher G, Lee CI. Lowry KP, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11792. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32721031 Free PMC article.

8

Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.

McDonald ES, Oustimov A, Weinstein SP, Synnestvedt MB, Schnall M, Conant EF. McDonald ES, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;2(6):737-43. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5536. JAMA Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26893205

9

Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.

Pattacini P, Nitrosi A, Giorgi Rossi P, Iotti V, Ginocchi V, Ravaioli S, Vacondio R, Braglia L, Cavuto S, Campari C; RETomo Working Group. Pattacini P, et al. Radiology. 2018 Aug;288(2):375-385. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172119. Epub 2018 Jun 5. Radiology. 2018. PMID: 29869961 Clinical Trial.

10

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Jänsch A, Hacker A, Weinand S, Vogelmann T. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, et al. Eur Radiol. 2022 Apr;32(4):2301-2312. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08308-8. Epub 2021 Oct 25. Eur Radiol. 2022. PMID: 34694451 Free PMC article.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

150 results

Results by year