Disease Risk & Landscape Attributes of Tick-Borne Borrelia Pathogens in the San Francisco Bay Area, California

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0134812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134812. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Habitat heterogeneity influences pathogen ecology by affecting vector abundance and the reservoir host communities. We investigated spatial patterns of disease risk for two human pathogens in the Borrelia genus-B. burgdorferi and B. miyamotoi-that are transmitted by the western black-legged tick, Ixodes pacificus. We collected ticks (349 nymphs, 273 adults) at 20 sites in the San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA. Tick abundance, pathogen prevalence and density of infected nymphs varied widely across sites and habitat type, though nymphal western black-legged ticks were more frequently found, and were more abundant in coast live oak forest and desert/semi-desert scrub (dominated by California sagebrush) habitats. We observed Borrelia infections in ticks at all sites where we able to collect >10 ticks. The recently recognized human pathogen, B. miyamotoi, was observed at a higher prevalence (13/349 nymphs = 3.7%, 95% CI = 2.0-6.3; 5/273 adults = 1.8%, 95% CI = 0.6-4.2) than recent studies from nearby locations (Alameda County, east of the San Francisco Bay), demonstrating that tick-borne disease risk and ecology can vary substantially at small geographic scales, with consequences for public health and disease diagnosis.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Arachnid Vectors / microbiology
  • Bays / microbiology
  • Bays / parasitology
  • Borrelia burgdorferi / pathogenicity
  • Ecosystem
  • Humans
  • Lyme Disease / epidemiology*
  • Lyme Disease / microbiology*
  • Lyme Disease / transmission
  • Molecular Sequence Data
  • Nymph / microbiology
  • Risk
  • San Francisco / epidemiology
  • Tick-Borne Diseases / epidemiology*
  • Tick-Borne Diseases / microbiology*
  • Tick-Borne Diseases / transmission
  • Ticks / microbiology*

Associated data

  • GENBANK/KT343318
  • GENBANK/KT343319
  • GENBANK/KT343320
  • GENBANK/KT343321
  • GENBANK/KT343322
  • GENBANK/KT343323
  • GENBANK/KT343324
  • GENBANK/KT343325
  • GENBANK/KT343326
  • GENBANK/KT343327
  • GENBANK/KT343328
  • GENBANK/KT343329
  • GENBANK/KT343330
  • GENBANK/KT343331
  • GENBANK/KT343332
  • GENBANK/KT343333
  • GENBANK/KT343334
  • GENBANK/KT343335
  • GENBANK/KT343336
  • GENBANK/KT343337
  • GENBANK/KT343338
  • GENBANK/KT343339
  • GENBANK/KT343340
  • GENBANK/KT343341
  • GENBANK/KT343342
  • GENBANK/KT343343
  • GENBANK/KT343344
  • GENBANK/KT343345
  • GENBANK/KT343346
  • GENBANK/KT343347
  • GENBANK/KT343348
  • GENBANK/KT343349
  • GENBANK/KT343350
  • GENBANK/KT343351

Grants and funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Bay Area Lyme Foundation, http://www.bayarealyme.org/, to DJS, NCN and EL. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.