The diagnostic accuracies of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in general practice: The results of the MAGIC (Manchester Airways Group Identifying COPD) study

Prim Care Respir J. 2006 Oct;15(5):286-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pcrj.2006.07.007. Epub 2006 Sep 15.

Abstract

Background: Although it is generally accepted that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is underdiagnosed, there is little objective information concerning the size of the problem in the UK.

Method: Patients from two general practices were offered spirometry if they were aged 30 or older, had reported ever smoking in one of four postal respiratory surveys (1993-2001), and/or reported four or more symptoms or risk factors in 2001 indicating likely obstructive airways disease.

Results: Of 2646 subjects invited, 871 attended and 825 had adequate spirometry results for analysis. In all, 163 patients had spirometrically-confirmed COPD; 103 of these (63.2%) had no recorded COPD in their practice records, including 14 out of 31 (45.2%) whose spirometry results classified them as having severe or very severe COPD.

Conclusion: This study found a considerable under-recording of COPD in two general practices. This may be due to a combination of administrative and diagnostic problems (including the under-use of spirometers), and a reluctance of patients to present with their symptoms. These results have important implications in terms of unmet need and resource utilisation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Data Collection
  • Family Practice
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / diagnosis*
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / epidemiology
  • Spirometry*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • United Kingdom / epidemiology