A review of quality of life in chronic renal failure

Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Aug;12(2 Pt 1):140-60. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712020-00005.

Abstract

The quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has become an area of intensive investigation because of the high costs of renal-replacement therapy (dialysis or renal transplantation) and the rising prevalence of renal failure. Studies comparing quality of life of patients using different forms of renal-replacement therapy are flawed by deficiencies in study design, such as lack of randomisation. Nevertheless, in both retrospective and prospective studies, transplantation has been shown to offer the highest levels of functional ability, employment and subjective quality of life. After case-mix adjustment, there is little difference between peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis in terms of quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes. Vocational rehabilitation is an important aim of therapy; for patients below retirement age, pre-dialysis education and counselling are important in maintaining employment. The elderly comprise the fastest-growing group of dialysis recipients; multiple comorbidities add to functional impairment in these patients. Subjective quality of life remains surprisingly high in many elderly patients, despite poor objective quality of life. The quality of life of patients with diabetes mellitus and ESRD is lower than that of nondiabetic patients with ESRD. For selected patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, combined renal and pancreatic transplantation offers the advantage of freedom from insulin injections. Unfortunately, available evidence suggests only small improvements in quality of life with combined transplantation versus kidney-only transplantation, probably because many patients have developed multiple diabetic complications by the time of transplantation. Epoetin alfa (erythropoietin) has been shown to improve quality of life in a number of trials. The optimal target haematocrit is a subject of controversy, but on current evidence, a target of 34 to 37% is reasonable. The degree of improvement in quality of life must be balanced against the additional costs of achieving a higher haematocrit. Further study is necessary to clarify the optimal target haematocrit for epoetin alfa therapy, as well as the possible effects of nutritional support, growth hormone in paediatric patients, and combined renal and pancreatic transplantation in improving quality of life.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / economics
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / psychology*
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / therapy
  • Kidney Transplantation / economics
  • Quality of Life*