Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neuropsychological predictors of decision-making capacity over 9 months in mild-to-moderate dementia

  • Populations At Risk
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older adults with dementia may have diminished capacity to make medical treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVE: To examine rates and neuropsychological predictors of treatment decision making, or consent capacity, among older adults with dementia over 9 months.

DESIGN: Consent capacity was assessed initially and 9 months later in subjects with and without dementia using a longitudinal repeated measures design.

PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-three older adults with dementia and 53 similarly aged adults without dementia.

MEASUREMENTS: A standardized measure MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Treatment of 4 legal standards for capacity (Understanding, Appreciation, Reasoning, and Expressing a Choice) and a neuropsychological battery.

RESULTS: In the dementia group, 9.4% had impaired capacity initially, and 26.4% had impaired capacity at 9 months. Mean scores in the dementia group were impaired relative to controls initially and at 9 months for Understanding (initial t=2.49, P=.01; 9-month t=3.22, P<.01) and Reasoning (initial t=2.18, P=.03; 9-month t=4.77, P<.01). Declining capacity over 9 months was attributable to a further reduction in Reasoning (group × time F=9.44, P=.003). Discriminant function analysis revealed that initial scores on naming, delayed Logical Memory, and Trails B were associated with impaired capacity at 9 months.

CONCLUSIONS: Some patients with mild-to-moderate dementia develop a clinically relevant impairment of consent capacity within a year. Consent capacity in adults with mild-to-moderate dementia should be reassessed periodically to ensure that it is adequate for each specific informed consent situation. Interventions that maximize Understanding and Reasoning by supporting naming, memory, and flexibility may help to optimize capacity in this patient group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim SYH, Karlawish JHT, Caine ED. Current state of research on decision-making competence of cognitively impaired elderly persons. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002;10:151–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marson DC, Ingram KK, Cody HA, Harrell LE. Assessing the competency of patients with Alzheimer’s disease under different legal standards. Arch Neurol. 1995;52:949–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moye J, Karel MJ, Azar AR, Gurrera RJ. Capacity to consent to treatment: empirical comparison of three instruments in older adults with and without dementia. Gerontologist. 2004;44:166–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong JG, Clare ICH, Holland AJ, Watson PC, Gunn M. The capacity of people with a “mental disability” to make a health care decision. Psychol Med. 2000;30:295–306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marson DC, McInturff B, Hawkins L, Bartolucci A, Harrell LE. Consistency of physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Am Geriatrics Soc. 1997;45:453–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marson DC, Hawkins L, McInturff B, Harrell LE. Cognitive models that predict physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatrics Soc. 1997;45:458–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Marson DC, Earnst K, Jamil F, Bartolucci A, Harell LE. Consistency of physicians’ legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatrics Soc. 2000;48:911–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grisso T, Applebaum PS. Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment. New York: Oxford; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roth LH, Meisel CA, Lidz CA. Tests of competency to consent to treatment. Canadian J Psychiatry. 1977;134:279–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brandt J, Welsh KA, Breitner JC, Folstein MF, Helms M, Christian JC. Hereditary influences on cognitive functioning in older men: a study of 4000 twin pairs. Arch Neurol. 1993;50:599–603.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA. Geriatric depression scale: recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontologist. 1986;5:165–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Derogatis LR. Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, Scoring and Procedures Manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers RL, Meyer JS. Computerized history and self-assessment questionnaire for diagnostic screening among patients with dementia. J Am Geriatrics Soc. 1988;36:13–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Welsh KA, Breitner JCS, Magruder-Habib KM. Detection of dementia in the elderly using the telephone interview for cognitive status. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1993;6:103–10.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Christensen KC, Moye J, Armson RR, Kern TM. Health screening and random recruitment for cognitive aging research. Psychol Aging. 1992;7:204–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grisso T, Appelbaum A. MacArthur Competency Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological Assessment. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marson DC, Chatterjee A, Ingram KK, Harrell LE. Toward a neurologic model of competency: cognitive predictors of capacity to consent in Alzheimer’s disease using three different legal standards. Neurology. 1996;46:666–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Silva Duarte AP, Stam A. Discriminant analysis. In: Grimm LG, Yarnold PR, eds. Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Barton CD, Mallik HS, Orr WB, Janofsky JS. Clinicians’ judgement of capacity of nursing home patients to give informed consent. Psychiatric Services. 1996;47:956–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pruchno RA, Smyer MA, Rose MS, Hartman-Stein PE, Laribee-Henderson DL. Competence of long-term care residents to participate in decisions about their medical care: a brief, objective assessment. Gerontologist. 1995;35:622–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Royall DR, Cordes J, Polk M. Executive control and the comprehension of medical information by elderly retirees. Exp Aging Res. 1997;23:301–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. The MacArthur treatment competency study III: abilities of patients to consent to psychiatric and medical treatment. Law Hum Behav. 1995;19:149–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moye J, Karel M. Evaluating decisional capacities in older adults: results of two clinical studies. Adv Med Psychol. 1999;10:71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dymek MP, Atchison P, Harrell L, Marson DC. Competency to consent to medical treatment in cognitively impaired patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 2001;56:17–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hopp FP, Duffy SA. Racial variations in end-of-life care. J Am Geriatrics Soc. 2000;48:658–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Eleazer GP, Hornung CA, Egbert CB, et al. The relationship between ethnicity and advance directives in a frail older population. J Am Geriatrics Soc. 1996;44:938–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Moye J, Gurrera RJ, Karel MJ, Edelstein B, O’Connell C. Empirical advances in the assessment of the capacity to consent to medical treatment: clinical implications and research needs. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005, in press.

  30. Dunn LB, Jeste DV. Enhancing informed consent for research and treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;24:595–607.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Finucane ML, Alhakami A, Slovic P, Johnson SM. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J Behav Decision Making. 2000;13:1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Meyer BJF, Russo C, Talbot A. Discourse comprehension and problem solving: decisions about the treatment of breast cancer by women across the lifespan. Psychol Aging. 1995;10.

  33. Karel MJ. The assessment of values in medical decision making. J Aging Studies. 2000;14:403–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Moye PhD.

Additional information

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

This research was supported by a NIMH grant to the first author (R29 MH57104).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moye, J., Karel, M.J., Gurrera, R.J. et al. Neuropsychological predictors of decision-making capacity over 9 months in mild-to-moderate dementia. J GEN INTERN MED 21, 78–83 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00288.x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00288.x

Key Words

Navigation