Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chlamydia screening and management practices of primary care physicians and nurse practitioners in California

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because sexually transmitted chlamydial infections are common among young women, it is critical that providers screen and manage these infections appropriately.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the Chlamydia care practices of California primary care physicians and nurse practitioners.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional, self-report mail survey.

PARTICIPANTS: A stratified random sample of primary care physicians and a convenience sample of primary care nurse practitioners in California.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Survey content included 5 topic areas: sexual history taking, management of cervicitis, management of a nonpregnant Chlamydia-infected patient, availability of on-site STD services, and Chlamydia screening practices and attitudes. Main outcome measure was the reported frequency of Chlamydia screening of sexually active women age 25 and younger. Respondents included 708 physicians (49% response rate) and 895 nurse practitioners (63% response rate). Nearly half of physicians (47%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 42% to 51%) and a majority of nurse practitioners (79%, 95% CI, 77% to 82%) reported routine Chlamydia screening of women under age 20; similar proportions reported routinely screening women aged 20 to 25 years. Independent predictors of screening among physicians were adolescent medicine specialty, female gender, practicing in a nonprivate setting, and having a higher volume of female patients. Additional findings included the overscreening of women over age 25 by nurse practitioners and the shared concern among providers that Chlamydia screening may not be reimbursed.

CONCLUSIONS: The Chlamydia care practices of many California primary care providers are inconsistent with current guidelines. Targeted provider education and improved reimbursements are potential strategies for improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines 2002. MMWR. 2002;51:1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hillis SD, Owens LM, Marchbanks PA, Amsterdam LF, MacKenzie WR. Recurrent chlamydial infections increase the risks of hospitalization for ectopic pregnancy and pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:103–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stamm WE. Chlamydia trachomatis infections of the adult. In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mardh P-A, et al., eds. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1999:407–22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scholes D, Stergachis A, Heidrich FE, Andrilla H, Holmes KK, Stamm WE. Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1362–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bachmann LH, Macaluso M, Hook EW. Demonstration of declining community prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection using sentinel surveillance. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:20–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for chlmaydial infection: Recommendation and rationale. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(3 suppl):90–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. St Lawrence JS, Montano DE, Kasprzyk D, Phillips WR, Armstrong K, Leichliter JS. STD screening, testing, case reporting, and clinical and partner notification practices: a national survey of US physicians. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1784–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. National Committee for Quality Assurance. State of Health Care Quality Report, 2003: Chlamydia Screening. Available at: http://www.ncqa.org/sohc2003/chlamydia_screening.htm#Results%20and%20Analysis. Accessed April 14, 2004.

  9. Ewing GB, Selassie AW, Lopez CH, McCutcheon EP. Self-report of delivery of clinical preventive services by U.S. physicians. Comparing specialty, gender, age, setting of practice, and area of practice. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17:62–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Millstein SG, Igra V, Gans J. Delivery of STD/HIV preventive services to adolescents by primary care physicians. J Adolesc Health. 1996;19:249–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ellen JM, Franzgrote M, Irwin CE, Millstein SG. Primary care physicians’ screening of adolescent patients: a survey of California physicians. J Adolesc Health. 1998;22:433–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Halpern-Felsher BL, Ozer EM, Millstein SG, et al. Preventive services in a health maintenance organization: how well do pediatricians screen and educate adolescent patients? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:173–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lafferty WE, Downey L, Shields AW, Holan CM, Lind A. Adolescent enrollees in Medicaid managed care: the provision of well care and sexual health assessment. J Adolesc Health. 2001;28:497–508.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Burstein GR, Lowry R, Klein JD, Santelli JS. Missed opportunities for sexually transmitted diseases, human immunodeficiency virus, and pregnancy prevention services during adolescent health supervision visites. Pediatrics. 2003;111(5 Part 1):996–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Magid DJ, Stiffman M, Anderson LA, Irwin K, Lyons EE. Adherence to CDC STD guideline recommendations for the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in two managed care organizations. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:30–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. California Chlamydia Action Coalition. California Sexually Transmitted Disease Initiatives Home Page. Available at: http://www.ucsf.edu/castd/. Accessed April 13, 2004.

  17. Brindis CD, Llewelyn L, Marie K, Blum M, Biggs A, Maternowska C. Meeting the reproductive health care needs of adolescents: California’s family planning access, care, and treatment program. J Adolesc Health. 2003;32(6 suppl):79–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. California Family Planning A, Care and Treatment (Family PACT) Program. Family PACT Home Page. Available at: http://www.dhs.ca.gov/pcfh/ofp/Programs/FamPACT/default.htm. Accessed April 14, 2004.

  19. SAS. Statistical software [computer program]. Version 8.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1999–2001.

    Google Scholar 

  20. STATA. Statistics/Data Analysis [computer program]. Version 7.0. College Station, Tex: STATA; 1984–2002.

    Google Scholar 

  21. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Counseling to Prevent HIV Infection and Other Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Baltmore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1996:723–37.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Boekeloo BO, Marx ES, Kral AH, Coughlin SC, Bowman M, Rabin DL. Frequency and thoroughness of STD/HIV risk assessment by physicians in a high-risk metropolitan area. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1645–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Torkko KC, Gershman K, Crane LA, Hamman R, Baron A. Testing for Chlamydia and sexual history taking in adolescent females: results from a statewide survey of Colorado primary care providers. Pediatrics. 2000;106:E32.

    Google Scholar 

  24. California Department of Health Services. Sexually Transmitted Diseases in California, 2002. Sacramento, Calif: California Department of Health Services; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Uses and abuses of screening tests. Lancet. 2002;359:881–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. California Chlamydia Action Coalition. Chlamydia Screening and Treatment Practice Guidelines (First Release). Berkeley, Calif: California Chlamydia Action Coalition; December 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  27. California Chlamydia Action Coalition. Chlamydia Screening and Treatment Practice Guidelines. Berkeley, Calif: California Chlamydia Action Coalition; November 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah L. Guerry MD.

Additional information

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this article or this research.

This project was supported in part by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Comprehensive STD Prevention Systems and Infertility Prevention Project Grant #H25/CCH904362), the California STD/HIV Prevention Training Center (Grant #R30/CCR91546707), and the California Department of Health Services.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guerry, S.L., Bauer, H.M., Packel, L. et al. Chlamydia screening and management practices of primary care physicians and nurse practitioners in California. J GEN INTERN MED 20, 1102–1107 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00240.x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00240.x

Key Words

Navigation