Review
Impulsivity and adolescent substance use: Rashly dismissed as “all-bad”?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.06.003Get rights and content

Abstract

The initial use of illicit drugs and alcohol typically occurs during adolescence. Individual differences in impulsivity and related constructs are consistently identified as key factors in the initiation and later problematic use of substances. Consequently, impulsivity is generally regarded as a negative trait; one that conveys only risk. However, what is often overlooked in addiction science is the positive role facets of trait impulsivity can play in everyday life and adaptive functioning. The following review aims to summarize recent advances in the psychobiology of impulsivity, including current perspectives on how it can convey risk for substance misuse. The review will also consider the importance of adolescence as a phase of life characterized by substantial neurodevelopment and natural increases in impulsivity. Uniquely, the review aims to reframe thinking on adolescent impulsivity to include the positive with the negative, and discuss how such thinking can benefit efforts for early intervention and future research.

Section snippets

A model of how impulsivity conveys risk for addiction

Dawe and Loxton (2004), in their review of the literature, concluded that impulsivity was better conceptualized as a two-dimensional trait. The first trait, labeled Reward Drive (RD), is argued to reflect individual differences in sensitivity to incentive motivation and engagement in appetitive behavior upon detection of reward cues (e.g., walking past a bar). The conceptualization of this trait was based on the Behavioral Approach/Activation System (BAS) proposed in Gray's Reinforcement

Impulsivity and adolescent substance misuse

It is well established that trait impulsivity conveys risk for the development of substance use problems in adolescents. However, it is important to note that the vast majority of studies examining this relationship measured impulsivity with scales that have since been shown to load on an RI-like factor. As a result, we will refer to the “impulsivity” examined in such studies as RI.

In addition to family (e.g., parental substance use, family dysfunction) and social factors (e.g., peer group,

Impulsivity and neurocognitive changes in adolescence

Across species, adolescence is a phase of life characterized by marked changes in the neuronal architecture and functioning of the brain (Spear, 2000). These changes are believed to play a significant role in the behavioral manifestations commonly thought to typify “the teenage years”; namely, sensation-seeking, poor judgment, and risk-taking (Steinberg, 2005). Indeed, it is difficult to underestimate the magnitude of transition taking place in the adolescent brain. Neurophysiological changes

Impulsivity: is it really all bad?

There is clear evidence that both impulsivity components play a role in addictive behavior. However, RD and RI are also related to certain adaptive behaviors that addiction scientists tend not to focus on. In this section, we review some of this research and follow it with a discussion of the importance of this trait to healthy behavior as well as how intervention approaches may be able to capitalize on high levels of RD and RI.

Reward Drive is a component of impulsivity that is measured, to

Implications for intervention

Traditionally, therapeutic interventions for substance use problems have focused on techniques aimed at enhancing restraint and avoidance of situations in which a person is likely to be tempted to use an abused substance. However, more recent approaches have begun to focus on “redirecting” approach behavior to healthier goals. Examples of this approach include contingency management (CM), which involves rewarding (e.g., with vouchers, cash, methadone) behaviors that are consistent with

Summary and way forward

The aim of the present article was to review recent theoretical and empirical developments in the neuropsychology of impulsivity and substance misuse. This began with a discussion of the current conceptualization of trait impulsivity as a multidimensional construct and how different components of this trait are believed to influence behaviors involved in the addictive process. This conceptualization is an attempt to synthesize data obtained from a large body of research that has focused on

References (127)

  • S. Dawe et al.

    The role of impulsivity in the development of substance use and eating disorders

    Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

    (2004)
  • S. Dawe et al.

    Reward drive and rash impulsiveness as dimensions of impulsivity: implications for substance misuse

    Addictive Behaviors

    (2004)
  • M. Ernst et al.

    Decision-making in a risk-taking task: a PET study

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2002)
  • M. Ernst et al.

    Amygdala and nucleus accumbens in responses to receipt and omission of gains in adults and adolescents

    Neuroimage

    (2005)
  • N. Eshel et al.

    Neural substrates of choice selection in adults and adolescents: development of the ventrolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices

    Neuropsychologia

    (2007)
  • I.H.A. Franken

    Behavioral Approach System (BAS) sensitivity predicts alcohol craving

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2002)
  • I.H.A. Franken et al.

    Individual differences in decision-making

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2005)
  • I.H.A. Franken et al.

    Gray's impulsivity dimension: a distinction between reward sensitivity versus rash impulsiveness

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2006)
  • N. Garmezy et al.

    Studies of stress-resistant children: methods, variables, and preliminary findings

  • J.L. Grenard et al.

    Brief intervention for substance use among at-risk adolescents: a pilot study

    Journal of Adolescent Health

    (2007)
  • N. Horn et al.

    Response inhibition and impulsivity: an fMRI study

    Neuropsychologia

    (2003)
  • G.G. Knyazev

    Behavioural activation as predictor of substance use: mediating and moderating role of attitudes and social relationships

    Drug and Alcohol Dependence

    (2004)
  • G.G. Knyazev et al.

    Personality and substance use in Russian youths: the predictive and moderating role of behavioural activation and gender

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2004)
  • G.F. Koob et al.

    Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2001)
  • M. Leyton et al.

    Amphetamine-induced increases in extracellular dopamine, drug wanting, and novelty seeking: a PET/[11C]Raclopride study in healthy men

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2002)
  • D.K. Linton et al.

    Personality and potential conceptions: mating success in a modern Western male sample

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2001)
  • C. Martin-Soelch et al.

    Appetitive conditioning: neural bases and implications for psychopathology

    Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

    (2007)
  • J.P. Newman et al.

    Passive avoidance in psychopaths: the effects of reward

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (1990)
  • K.L. Preston et al.

    Improvement in naltrexone treatment compliance with contingency management

    Drug and Alcohol Dependence

    (1999)
  • B. Reynolds et al.

    Delay discounting and probability discounting as related to cigarette smoking status in adults

    Behavioural Processes

    (2004)
  • C. Anderson et al.

    Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2001)
  • C. Avila

    Distinguishing BIS-mediated and BAS-mediated disinhibition mechanisms: a comparison of disinhibition models of Gray (1981, 1987) and of Patterson and Newman (1993)

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2001)
  • J.D. Beaver et al.

    Individual differences in reward drive predict neural responses to images of food

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2006)
  • A. Bechara et al.

    Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy

    Science

    (1997)
  • A. Bechara et al.

    Dissociation of working memory from decision making within the human prefrontal cortex

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (1998)
  • G. Bigelow et al.

    Theoretical and empirical foundations of contingency management treatments for drug abuse

  • J.E. Bono et al.

    Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (2004)
  • M.M. Botvinick et al.

    Conflict monitoring and cognitive control

    Psychological Review

    (2001)
  • J.S. Brook et al.

    The onset of marijuana use from preadolescence and early adolescence to young adulthood

    Development and Psychopathology

    (1999)
  • K.M. Carroll et al.

    Targeting behavioral therapies to enhance naltrexone treatment of opioid dependence—efficacy of contingency management and significant other involvement

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (2001)
  • K.M. Carroll et al.

    The use of contingency management and motivational/skills-building therapy to treat young adults with marijuana dependence

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (2006)
  • C.S. Carver et al.

    Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1994)
  • A. Caspi

    The child is father of the man: personality continuities from childhood to adulthood

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2000)
  • D.B. Clark et al.

    Alcohol, psychological dysregulation, and adolescent brain development

    Alcoholism-Clinical and Experimental Research

    (2008)
  • C.R. Cloninger

    A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: a proposal

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1987)
  • C.R. Cloninger

    The Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire

    (1989)
  • P.J. Corr

    Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) introduction

  • P.T. Costa et al.

    Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)

    (1992)
  • H. de Wit et al.

    Dual determinants of drug use in humans: reward and impulsivity

  • R.A. Depue et al.

    Neurobiology of the structure of personality: dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    (1999)
  • Cited by (136)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text