Review
How effective are breast cancer screening programmes by mammography? Review of the current evidence

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2009.03.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Randomised controlled trials showed that breast cancer screening by mammography reduces breast cancer mortality in women over age 50 by 25–30%. However, it was not clear if this effect would persist outside the controlled trial environment or even could be enhanced.

We review the current evidence of the impact of long-standing breast cancer screening programmes (Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom) on breast cancer mortality.

The decrease observed in women invited to screening ranges from 16% to 36%. Breast cancer mortality reductions range from 24% to 48% in women having attended at least one screen after correcting for selection bias. Although evaluation design, time period studied, participation rates achieved differ, the trend in mortality reduction is consistent. Adjuvant therapy is estimated to contribute about one third to this decrease. We conclude that mammography screening programmes implemented for at least 10 years achieve a similar, but not greater mortality reduction as the randomised controlled trials. However, it may take some more years before the full impact of these mammography screening programmes can be assessed.

Introduction

Based on the results of eight randomised controlled trials studying the efficacy of mammography screening to reduce breast cancer mortality and numerous meta-analyses, showing a 25–30% decrease in breast cancer deaths, several industrialised countries started implementing national mammography screening programmes in the 1980s and 1990s. A Cochrane review published in 20011, 2, 3 challenged the results of some of the randomised controlled trials leading to a major controversy on the benefits of mammography screening.c Several extensive reviews then re-asserted that randomised controlled trials had shown that breast cancer screening by mammography in women age 50–69 at regular intervals can reduce breast cancer mortality.5, 6, 7, 8 Furthermore many papers were published in 2002 and 2003 that countered specific issues raised in the Cochrane review.9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

However, it was not clear how much of this effect would persist outside the controlled trial environment. A first review of the effectiveness of mammography screening programmes was done at an international level by IARC in 2002.18 Analysing studies on the impact of service screening mammography published between 1990 and 2004, another review concluded that breast cancer mortality reductions observed were consistent with those observed in the randomised trials.19 In 2006, the Advisory Committee on Breast Cancer Screening in England considered efficacy of mammography screening to be underestimated in the randomised controlled trials.20 In the same year, a health technology assessment requested by the Quebec Ministry of Health (Canada) re-examined the scientific evidence on which screening mammography programmes are based.21 This extensive review also concluded that modern breast cancer screening programmes may achieve greater reduction in breast cancer mortality than was found in the screening trials, without providing conclusive evidence.

This paper reviews the recent evidence on the impact of breast cancer screening programmes on breast cancer mortality. We focus on programmes evaluated after at least 10 years of implementation, as statistically significant results of breast cancer screening can be expected 10–15 years after the introduction of the screening.

Section snippets

Methods

A Medline search on the effectiveness and breast cancer mortality reduction linked to mammography screening (programmes) was carried out and complemented by a search of references in the relevant articles. Only materials published in English language between 2000 and end of 2008 were included. Details of the search strategy are available with the authors. Evaluation reports of long-standing national programmes done by accredited national institutes were searched and complemented by information

Results

Breast cancer screening programmes by mammography have been operating for more than 10 years in Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxemburg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Some of these programmes were progressively geared towards national coverage, whereas other programmes remained limited to one or several regions of the country. Published materials assessing the impact of a mammography screening programme on breast

Discussion

The evidence emerging from long-standing breast cancer screening programmes shows a clear, albeit variable impact on breast cancer mortality. This variation is partly due to different assessment methods used as shown in Table 1. Some studies compare breast cancer mortality in screened women to non-screened women. This means 100% compliance rate in the screened group and reflects the effectiveness (or one could say, efficacy) of mammography screening per se (hereafter ‘screening effectiveness’).

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Acknowledgement

The initial data collection was partly carried out during a mandate to establish the benefits of breast cancer screening in Switzerland and was funded by the Swiss Cancer League.

References (49)

  • Olsen O, Gotzsche PC. Systematic review of screening for breast cancer with mammography....
  • P.C. Gotzsche et al.

    Screening for breast cancer with mammography (Review)

    (2006)
  • L.L. Humphrey et al.

    Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the US preventive services task force

    Ann Intern Med

    (2002)
  • International Agency for Cancer research

    Efficacy of screening

  • van Veen WA, Health Council of the Netherlands. The benefit of population screening for breast cancer with mammography....
  • US Preventive Task Force

    Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale

    Ann Intern Med

    (2002)
  • S.W. Duffy et al.

    The mammographic screening trials: commentary on the recent work by Olsen and Gotzsche

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2002)
  • B.B. Green et al.

    Breast cancer screening controversies

    J Am Board Fam Pract

    (2003)
  • C. Bouchardy et al.

    L’efficacité du dépistage mammographique est-elle vraiment contestable? Une revue critique de l’article de Gøtzsche et Olsen

    Schweizerische Aerztezeitung

    (2001)
  • D.A. Freedman et al.

    On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer

    Int J Epidemiol

    (2004)
  • Agence Nationale d’Accréditation et d’Evaluation en Santé (AENES). Dépistage du cancer du sein par mammographie:...
  • International Agency for Cancer research

    Effectiveness of screening

  • Advisory Committee on Breast Cancer Screening. Screening for breast cancer in England: past and future. NHS Cancer...
  • Deck WKR. Screening mammography: a reassessment. Montréal, Canada: Agence d’évaluation des technologies et des modes...
  • Cited by (146)

    • Exploring the influence of rural residence on uptake of organized cancer screening – A systematic review of international literature

      2021, Cancer Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cancer screening programmes aim to identify specific cancers at the earliest pre-symptomatic stage [1]. Colorectal, breast and cervical screening programmes have been found to reduce mortality because of the opportunity to detect precancerous lesions and preclinical cancer enabling early and potentially curative treatment leading to better cancer outcomes [2–6]. Cancer screening is currently the preserve of high income countries (as defined by the World Bank in 2019 as those with a gross national income per capita of more than US $12,535 [7]); the World Health Organization does not recommend cancer screening in low-income countries due to the lack of supporting health service infrastructure [8].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text