Original manuscript
A comparison of clinical outcomes and cost of office versus hospital hysteroscopy

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-3804(96)80107-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Study Objective. To compare office hysteroscopy with suction biopsy versus the hospital procedure with respect to clinical outcomes, success rates, and cost.

Design. Retrospective review of outpatient and inpatient records for all attempted office hysteroscopies with suction biopsy from September 1991 to June 1995, and all hospital diagnostic hysteroscopies with dilatation curettage from January 1993 to June 1994.

Setting. Multispeciality office group practice and a university-affiliated private hospital.

Patients. Four hundred seventy-three women who had office hysteroscopy with suction biopsy and 95 who had hospital diagnostic hysteroscopy with dilatation curettage.

Interventions. The procedures were performed by 13 gynecologists who had no experience with office hysteroscopy.

Measurements and Main Results. A cost analysis was completed by obtaining hospital and anesthesia charges for the hospital procedures and comparing them with office, instrument repair, and capital equipment costs. Gynecologists' professional fees were excluded from the analysis since they were the same in both settings. The overall failure rates to complete office and hospital hysteroscopies were 7.2% and 3.1%, respectively. Abnormal uterine bleeding was the indication in 89% of office and 96% of hospital procedures. Office hysteroscopy in these women revealed an abnormality in 40.1% of office versus 38.5% of hospital procedures. Histology revealed insufficient tissue for diagnosis in 3.4% office and 22.1% hospital procedures. The minor complication rate for office hysteroscopy was 1.9% and for hospital hysteroscopy 4.2%. There were no major complications in either group. The mean charges, excluding professional fees, for the hospital were $1799 versus $62 for office hysteroscopy.

Conclusions. Office hysteroscopy has a high success rate and a low complication rate even when performed by a group of gynecologists with limited experience in the procedure. Because of its lower cost and greater diagnostic accuracy, office hysteroscopy with suction biopsy should be the method of choice for evaluating gynecologic conditions such as abnormal bleeding.

References (26)

  • LindemannHJ et al.

    CO2 hysteroscopy diagnosis and treatment

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1976)
  • SmithJJ et al.

    Current dilatation and curettage practice: A need for revision

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1985)
  • GillespieA et al.

    The value of hysteroscopy

    Aust NZ Obstet Gynaecol

    (1994)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Single-incision Midurethral Sling by the Dynamic Intraoperative Standing Sling Technique as an Office-based Procedure: A Pilot Study

      2021, Urology
      Citation Excerpt :

      As in-office surgery would further reduce ancillary support staff, need for anesthesia services, and other overhead costs, there must be significant cost savings to the patient, insurance provider, and ultimately society. Hidlebaugh20 found that hysteroscopy charges in hospital totaled $1799 while only $62 in office. Examples of procedures in other fields that have decreased costs when performed in-office includes laryngopharyngeal surgery,21 carpal tunnel,22 and vasectomies.23

    • Identifying the superior surgical procedure for endometrial polypectomy: A network meta-analysis

      2019, International Journal of Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, this procedure allows simultaneous tissue cutting and extraction from the uterine cavity under direct hysteroscopic view, reducing time from repeated insertion and removal of the hysteroscope to extract material through the endocervix during resectoscopy. Additionally, it was claimed that application of hysteroscopic morcellation showed shorter learning curves and was easier to use [31,32]. These may be the reasons why hysteroscopic morcellation takes shorter operative time than other procedures.

    • Hysteroscopy in postmenopausal bleeding

      2001, Medical Journal Armed Forces India
      Citation Excerpt :

      White featureless endometrium was seen in 25 cases which proved to be postmenopausal atrophic endometrium histopathologically. In our study, hysteroscopy was performed under general anaesthesia after hospital admission but office hysteroscopy has come up in a big way for evaluation of selected cases of postmenopausal bleeding and abnormal genital bleeding [2–4]. Comparison of the hysteroscopic findings between the present study and the one undertaken by Liu Y et al [5] is given in Table-2.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Presented at the World Congress of Hysteroscopy, Miami, Florida, February 9–11, 1996.

    View full text