Review and special articlePhysician response to surveys: A review of the literature1
Introduction
Physicians play a key role in the rapidly changing health care and public health system, and it is essential to study their attitudes, beliefs, behaviors, and concerns. One of the most effective ways of doing this is through the use of surveys. Surveys of physicians are widely used for eliciting opinions on issues affecting practice,1 the delivery of clinical preventive services,2 implementation of public health interventions,3 the changing environment of medicine in the era of managed care,4 ethics,5 prevention efforts,6, 7 and other topics.
Epidemiologists, health administrators, and other public health professionals rely on mailed questionnaires to obtain data from physicians.8 However, low response rates to physician surveys are common, which could seriously impair the validity and generalizability of results.9, 10, 11, 12, 13 For example, one study examining response rates among 321 mail surveys published in medical journals over a one-year period showed that nonphysician surveys had a mean response rate of 68% compared to 54% in physician surveys.14 These circumstances have motivated investigators to consider the differences between the general public and physicians regarding survey response, and to specifically examine the best ways to survey physicians so as to maximize response rates and minimize nonresponse bias.
Mail surveys of highly educated, professional persons (e.g., physicians) should theoretically elicit higher response rates than those of less educated respondents. Overall, such persons (1) can read the survey and (2) are more likely to have considered issues that are to be covered in the survey and to have formulated their opinions in advance.11 Alternatively, some professionals may resist surveys or questions that (1) stereotype or generalize issues, (2) are restrictive (i.e., multiple choice questions), (3) do not make sense to them, and (4) take too much time out of an already overburdened schedule.5
Although abundant research exists regarding the way in which the general population responds to surveys,10, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 there are relatively few studies examining how and why physicians respond. In addition, 6 of the 24 studies reviewed in this paper were not available on Medline (i.e., they were found on PsychINFO) and thus may not be readily available to researchers planning physician surveys. To assess techniques purported to increase the response rates of physicians, we reviewed peer-reviewed literature and examined methods used to increase response rates to physician-specific surveys. While the limited number of studies and comparison difficulties across studies preclude universal conclusions, methodologic issues raised in this review can be considered by researchers who are in the business of conducting surveys of physicians.
Section snippets
Methods
We searched Medline and PsychINFO databases from 1967 through February 1999 to identify published research on survey methodology specific to physicians. The references of all retrieved articles were screened for further citations. The search was limited to articles in English. Medline/PsychINFO index terms searched included “questionnaire,” “survey,” and “physician.” “Methodology” and “questionnaire” were also searched using the text word option in Medline.
Only randomized, controlled studies
Results
We found 24 published studies that examined methods to increase physicians’ response rates to mail, telephone, or personal interview surveys. These studies evaluated techniques to improve response rates, compared the efficacy of mail versus telephone and mail versus personal interview surveys and examined the effect of nonresponse bias in physician surveys.
Five papers examined general attempts to increase response rates to the first mailing of a survey (Table 1). Pre-notification of survey
Discussion
We reviewed available published literature and found several simple interventions that may increase response rates to physician surveys. Although the number of studies dealing directly with strategies to improve physician survey response is small compared to survey methods of the general population, the studies we reviewed are of high quality and similarities to findings from survey methods research of the general population support our findings.
The strategies we found effective in these
References (47)
- et al.
Self-report of delivery of clinical preventive services by U.S. physicianscomparing specialty, gender, age, setting of practice, and area of practice
Am J Prev Med
(1999) - et al.
Implementing breast cancer screening guidelinesresults of the Ontario Health Status Survey
Am J Prev Med
(1997) - et al.
Tuberculosis screening in private physicians’ offices, Pennsylvania, 1996
Am J Prev Med
(1999) - et al.
Skin cancer screening by Australian family physiciansvariation with physician beliefs and geographic locality
Am J Prev Med
(1999) - et al.
Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals
J Clin Epidemiol
(1997) Questionnaire construction and item writing
- et al.
Effects on response rates and cost of stamps vs. business reply in a mail survey of physicians
J Clin Epidemiol
(1993) - et al.
Curbside consultation practices and attitudes among primary care physicians and medical subspecialists
JAMA
(1998) - et al.
Managed care and physician’s provision of charity care
JAMA
(1999) - et al.
Medical students’ attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide
JAMA
(1999)
Increasing response rates in physicians’ mail surveysan experimental study
Am J Public Health
Interviewing physiciansthe effect of improved response rate
Am J Public Health
Survey research methods
Mail surveys of reluctant professionals
Eval Rev
Physicians’ reactions to a mailed questionnairea study in “resistentialism.”
Public Opinion Q
Don’t survey physicians!
Not another questionnaire! Eliciting the views of general practitioners
Fam Pract
Stimulating responses to mailed questionnairesa review
Public Opinion Q
Mail and telephone surveysthe total design method
Mail survey response ratea method analysis of selected techniques for increasing response
Public Opinion Q
The effect of monetary incentives and follow-up mailings on the response rate and the response quality in mail surveys
Public Opinion Q
How to conduct your own survey
Response effects
Cited by (787)
Environmental management of asthma in clinical practice: Results from the 2012 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey
2024, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: GlobalMental Health Integration and Delivery in the Hospice and Palliative Medicine Setting: A National Survey of Clinicians
2024, Journal of Pain and Symptom ManagementCardiac Surgery Exposure in General Surgery Residency—A Survey of General Surgery Residency Program Directors
2023, Journal of Surgical Education
- 1
The full text of this article is available via AJPM Online at www.elseveir.com/locate/ajpmonline.