Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

When a Usual Source of Care and Usual Provider Matter: Adult Prevention and Screening Services

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether the usual source of preventive care, (having a usual place for care only or the combination of a usual place and provider compared with no usual source of preventive care) is associated with adults receiving recommended screening and prevention services.

DESIGN

Using cross-sectional survey data for 24,138 adults (ages 18–64) from the 1999 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), we estimated adjusted odds ratios using separate logistic regression models for receipt of five preventive services: influenza vaccine, Pap smear, mammogram, clinical breast exam, and prostate specific antigen.

RESULTS

Having both a usual place and a usual provider was consistently associated with increased odds for receiving preventive care/screening services compared to having a place only or neither. Adults ages 50–64 with a usual place/provider had 2.8 times greater odds of receiving a past year flu shot compared with those who had neither. Men ages 50–64 with a usual place/provider had nearly 10 times higher odds of receiving a PSA test compared with men who had neither. Having a usual place/provider compared with having neither was associated with 3.9 times higher odds of clinical breast exam among women ages 20–64, 4.1 times higher odds of Pap testing among women ages 21–64, and 4.8 times higher odds of mammogram among women ages 40–64.

CONCLUSIONS

Having both a usual place and usual provider is a key variable in determining whether adults receive recommended screening and prevention services and should be considered a fundamental component of any medical home model for adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Health Resources and Services Administration. Maternal and Child Health Bureau web page, Achieving and Measuring Success: A National Agenda for Children with Special Health Care Needs. Available at: http://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs/specialneeds/measuresuccess.htm. Accessed: June 18, 2007

  2. Damiano PC, Momany ET, Tyler MC, et al. Cost of outpatient medical care for children and youth with special health care needs: investigating the impact of the medical home. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e1187–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Starfield B, Shi L. The medical home, access to care, and insurance: a review of evidence. Pediatrics. 2004;113suppl1493–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith PJ, Santoli JM, Chu SY, et al. The association between having a medical home and vaccination coverage among children eligible for the vaccines for children program. Pediatrics. 2005;116:130–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu KT. Usual source of care in preventive service use: a regular doctor versus a regular site. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:1509–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barr M, Ginsburg J. The advanced medical home: A patient-centered, physician-guided model of health care. Policy Monograph. Philadelphia PA: American College of Physicians; 2006. Available at: http://www.acponline.org/hpp/adv_med.pdf

  7. DeVoe JE, Fryer GE, Phillips R, et al. Receipt of preventive care among adults: insurance status and usual source of care. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:786–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ettner SL. The relationship between continuity of care and the health behaviors of patients: does having a usual physician make a difference? Med Care. 1999;37:547–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. Cancer screening in the United States, 2007: a review of current guidelines, practices, and prospects. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57290–104.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software; Release 9.0. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  11. StataCorp. Survey Data Reference Manual. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ettner SL. The timing of preventive services for women and children: the effect of having a usual source of care. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:1748–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Doescher MP, Saver BG, Fiscella K, et al. Preventive care: Does continuity count? J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:632–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Partnership for Prevention. Preventive Care: A National Profile on Use, Disparities and Health Benefits. Washington DC: Partnership for Prevention; August 2007. Available at: http://www.prevent.org/content/view/129/72/.

Download references

Acknowledgement

This project was funded, in part, by a grant to the University of Minnesota School of Public Health from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to establish the “Integrated Health Interview Series (IHIS).” NICHD Contract #1-R01-HD046697–01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn A. Blewett PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blewett, L.A., Johnson, P.J., Lee, B. et al. When a Usual Source of Care and Usual Provider Matter: Adult Prevention and Screening Services. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 1354–1360 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0659-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0659-0

KEY WORDS

Navigation