Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The development of vaccination perspectives among chiropractic, naturopathic and medical students: a case study of professional enculturation

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An important influence on parents’ decisions about pediatric vaccination (children under 6 years of age) is the attitude of their health care providers, including complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers. Very limited qualitative research exists, however, on how attitudes towards vaccination develop among healthcare professionals in-training. We explored perspective development among three groups of students: medical, chiropractic, and naturopathic. We conducted focus group sessions with participants from each year of study at three different healthcare training programs in Ontario, Canada. Semi-structured and open-ended questions were used to elicit dynamic interaction among participants and explore how they constructed their attitudes toward vaccination at the beginning and part way through their professional training. Analyses of verbatim transcripts of audiotaped interviews were conducted both inductively and deductively using questions structured by existing literature on learning, professional socialization and interprofessional relations. We found five major themes and each theme was illustrated with representative quotes. Numerous unexpected insights emerged within these themes, including students’ general open-mindedness towards pediatric vaccination at the beginning of their training; the powerful influence of both formal education and informal socialization; uncritical acceptance of the vaccination views of senior or respected professionals; students’ preference for multiple perspectives rather than one-sided, didactic instruction; the absence of explicit socio-cultural tensions among professions; and how divergences among professional students’ perspectives result from differing emphases with respect to lifestyle, individual choice, public health and epidemiological factors—rather than disagreement concerning the biomedical evidence. This last finding implies that their different perspectives on pediatric vaccination may be complementary rather than irreconcilable. Our findings should be considered by developers of professional and interprofessional educational curricula and public health officials formulating policy on pediatric vaccination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Interestingly, this progressive, constructivist approach to professional education has parallels in patient education. Previous research indicates that parental vaccine related decisions are influenced by the patient-provider interaction, balanced information and discussion (Glanz et al. 2013; Smith et al. 2006).

References

  • Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1972). More is different: Broken symmetry and the nature of the hierarchical structure of science. Science, 177(4047), 393–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, A. (2003). Journeys into thirdspace? Health alliances and the challenge of border crossing. In A. Leathard (Ed.), Interprofessional collaboration: From policy to practice in health and social care (pp. 146–157). New York: Brunner-Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, I. R., Caspi, O., Schwartz, G. E. R., Grant, K. L., Gaudet, T. W., Rychener, D., et al. (2002). Integrative medicine and systemic outcomes research: Issues in the emergence of a new model for primary health care. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benin, A. L., Wisler-Scher, D. J., Colson, E., Shapiro, E. D., & Holmboe, E. S. (2006). Qualitative analysis of mothers’ decision-making about vaccines for infants: The importance of trust. Pediatrics, 117, 1532–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, M. J., & Lowenstein, A. J. (2007). Innovative teaching strategies in nursing and related health professions. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse, J. W., Kulkarni, A. V., Campbell, J. B., & Injeyan, H. S. (2002). Attitudes toward vaccination: A survey of Canadian Chiropractic students. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 166, 1531–1534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse, J. W., Walji, R., & Wilson, K. (2011). Parents’ experiences discussing pediatric vaccination with healthcare providers: A survey of Canadian naturopathic patients. PLoS ONE, 6(8), 1–6.

  • Busse, J. W., Wilson, K., & Campbell, J. B. (2008). Attitudes towards vaccination among chiropractic and naturopathic students. Vaccine, 26, 6237–6243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council on Foreign Relations, Vaccine preventable outbreaks. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2013, from http://www.cfr.org/interactives/GH_Vaccine_Map/#map.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2003). Why aren’t they getting this? Working through the regressive myths of constructivist pedagogy. Teaching Education, 14, 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubé, E., Vivion, M., Sauvageau, C., Gagneur, A., Gagnon, R., & Guay, M. (2013). How do midwives and physicians discuss childhood vaccination with parents? Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanz, J. M., Wagner, N. M., Narwaney, K. J., Shoup, J. A., McClure, D. L., McCormick, E. V., et al. (2013). A mixed methods study of parental vaccine decision making and parent–provider trust. Academic Pediatrics, 13(5), 481–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gust, D. A., Darling, N., Kennedy, A., & Schwartz, B. (2008). Parents with doubts about vaccines: Which vaccines and reasons why. Pediatrics, 122, 718–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gust, D. A., Kennedy, A., Shui, I., Smith, P. J., Nowak, G., & Pickering, L. K. (2005). Parent attitudes toward immunizations and healthcare providers: The role of information. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29, 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (2005). Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(S1), 188–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, C. M., & Pickering, L. K. (2011). How to communicate with vaccine-hesitant parents. Pediatrics, 127(Suppl. 1), S127–S133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, A., Lavail, K., Nowak, G., Basket, M., & Landry, S. (2011). Confidence about vaccines in the United States: Understanding parents’ perceptions. Health Affairs, 30, 1151–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (1983). The dialectic and rhetoric of disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity. Issues in Integrative Studies, 2, 35–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, A., Graff, L., & McLean, D. (2011). Behavioral change with influenza vaccination: Factors influencing increased uptake of the pandemic H1N1 versus seasonal influenza vaccine in health care personnel. Vaccine, 29(46), 8357–8363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leischow, S. J., Best, A., Trochim, W. M., Clark, P. I., Gallagher, R. S., Marcus, S. E., & Matthews, E. (2008). Systems thinking to improve the Public’s Health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(S2), 196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, A. (2009). Knowers and phenomena: Two different approaches to interdisciplinarity and interprofessionalism. Issues in Integrative Studies, 27, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, A. (2011). The complexities of interdisciplinarity: Integrating two different perspectives on interdisciplinary research and education. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 8(2), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, W. H. (2001). A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opstelten, W., van Essen, G. A., Heijnen, M. L., Ballieux, M. J., & Goudswaard, A. N. (2010). High vaccination rates for seasonal and pandemic (A/H1N1) influenza among healthcare workers in Dutch general practice. Vaccine, 28(38), 6164–6168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology (E. Duckworth, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Pope, C., van Royen, P., & Baker, R. (2002). Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 11, 148–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal, 320, 114–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proulx, J. (2006). Constructivism: A re-equilibration and clarification of the concepts, and some potential implications for teaching and pedagogy. Radical Pedagogy, 8(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Health Agency of Canada. (2006). Canadian National Report of Immunization, November, 32S3.

  • Ridda, I., Lindley, R., Gao, Z., McIntyre, P., & MacIntyre, C. R. (2008). Differences in attitudes, beliefs and knowledge of hospital health care workers and community doctors to vaccination of older people. Vaccine, 26(44), 5633–5640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, B. L., & Cowles, K. V. (1993). The qualitative research audit trail: A complex collection of documentation. Research in Nursing & Health, 16, 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, D. A., Moulton, L. H., Omer, S. B., Chace, L. M., Klassen, A., Talebian, P., et al. (2004). Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of school nurses and personnel and associations with nonmedical immunization exemptions. Pediatrics, 113, e552–e559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, D. A., Moulton, L. H., Omer, S. B., DeHart, M. P., Stokley, S., & Halsey, N. A. (2005). Factors associated with refusal of childhood vaccines: A case–control study. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159, 470–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. J., Kennedy, A. M., Wooten, K., Gust, D. A., & Pickering, L. K. (2006). Association between health care providers’ influence on parents who have concerns about vaccine safety and vaccination coverage. Pediatrics, 118(5), e1287–e1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van-Haaren, K. M., van-den-Brande, K. J., Dekker, F. W., Ligthart, G. J., & Springer, M. P. (1995). [Influenza vaccine in 85-and-over aged: motivation of elderly and family physicians to vaccinate or not] [original article in Dutch]. Nederlands-tijdschrift-voor-geneeskunde, 139(42), 2144–2148.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2014) WHO statement on the meeting of the International Health Regulations Emergency Committee concerning the international spread of wild poliovirus, World Health Organization. Retrieved July 7, 2014, from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2014/polio-20140505/en/.

  • Wilson, K., Mills, E., Boon, H., Tomlinson, G., & Ritvo, P. (2004). A survey of attitudes towards paediatric vaccinations amongst Canadian naturopathic students. Vaccine, 22, 329–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2006). Weekly Epidemiological Record, 81, 189–196.

  • Zimmerman, R. K., Barker, W. H., Strikas, R. A., Ahwesh, E. R., Mieczkowski, T. A., Janosky, J. E., et al. (1997). Developing curricula to promote preventive medicine skills. The Teaching Immunization for Medical Education (TIME) Project. TIME Development Committee. JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 705–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angus McMurtry.

Appendix

Appendix

Appendixs containing the (1) Focus Group Interview Questions and (2) Questions Used to Structure Deductive Data Analysis, are available upon request.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McMurtry, A., Wilson, K., Clarkin, C. et al. The development of vaccination perspectives among chiropractic, naturopathic and medical students: a case study of professional enculturation. Adv in Health Sci Educ 20, 1291–1302 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9602-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9602-4

Keywords

Navigation