Skip to main content
Log in

A survey of the timing and approach to the surgical management of patients with acute cholecystitis in Japanese hospitals

  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

Abstract

Background/Purpose

Despite the fact that there is evidence advocating early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (AC), the practice of this treatment has not been investigated sufficiently. This study was designed to assess the current practice of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for AC among Japanese general surgeons.

Methods

A postal questionnaire was sent to the 291 councillors of the Japanese Society of Abdominal Emergency Medicine in order to ascertain their current management of patients with AC.

Results

The response rate was 72.5%. A policy of early cholecystectomy for AC was adopted by 41.7% of the responding surgeons. However, almost the same percentage of surgeons routinely managed their patients conservatively, and opted for delayed cholecystectomy at a later date. The adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was made by 79.1% of surgeons. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with AC who had percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) was adopted by 73.9% of the surgeons. Of the surgeons opting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 37.3% performed intraoperative cholangiography laparoscopically for all patients with AC.

Conclusions

Although early cholecystectomy for patients with AC was not adopted by the majority of the surgeons who responded, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was a common procedure for early and delayed cholecystectomy. Despite evidence that strongly supports the use of early cholecystectomy, the use of this treatment remains suboptimal in Japan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BD Schirmer SB Edge J Dix P Mathew J Hyser JB Hanks et al. (1991) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy: treatment of choice for symptomatic cholecystitis Ann Surg 213 665–76 Occurrence Handle1828141 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3M3kslyqtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199106000-00018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. A Cushieri F Dubois J Mouiel P Mouiel H Becker G Buess et al. (1991) ArticleTitleThe European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 161 385–7 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(91)90603-B

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. HJ Jarvinen J Hastbacka (1980) ArticleTitleEarly cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized study Ann Surg 191 501–5 Occurrence Handle6445180 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3c7nsVWgtQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S Norrby P Herlin T Holmin R Sjodahl C Tagesson (1983) ArticleTitleEarly or delayed cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis? A clinical trial Br J Surg 70 163–5 Occurrence Handle6338991 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3s7lsVCqtw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. CF Chandler JS Lane P Ferguson JE Thompson (2000) ArticleTitleProspective evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis Am Surg 66 896–900 Occurrence Handle10993625 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvktlGgsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. CM Lo CL Liu ST Fan ECS Lai J Wong (1998) ArticleTitleProspective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Ann Surg 227 461–7 Occurrence Handle9563529 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3it12qsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199804000-00001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. IC Cameron C Chadwick J Phillips AG Johnson (2004) ArticleTitleManagement of acute cholecystitis in UK hospitals: time for a charge Postgrad Med J 80 292–4 Occurrence Handle15138321 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3ktVCnuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/pgmj.2002.004085

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. PSP Senapati D Bhattarcharya G Harinath BJ Ammori (2003) ArticleTitleA survey of the timing and approach to the surgical management of cholelithiasis in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis and acute cholecystitis in the UK Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85 306–12 Occurrence Handle14594533 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3srntlKhtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1308/003588403769162404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J Lahitinen EM Alhava S Aukee (1978) ArticleTitleAcute cholecystitits treated by early and delayed surgery. A controlled clinical trial Scand J Gastroenterol 13 673–8 Occurrence Handle10.3109/00365527809181780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. CK Kum E Eypasch R Lefering D Math A Paul E Neugebauer et al. (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: is it really safe? World J Surg 20 43–9 Occurrence Handle8588411 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK287kvVemsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002689900008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. JC Russell SJ WaIsh AS Mattie JT Lynch (1996) ArticleTitleBile duct injuries, 1989–1993. A statewide experience Arch Surg 131 382–8 Occurrence Handle8615723 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283gtFGjsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. G Branum C Schmtt J Baillie (1993) ArticleTitleManagement of major biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy Ann Surg 217 532–40 Occurrence Handle8489316 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s3ls1KntQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. JS Bender ME Zenilman (1995) ArticleTitleImmediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy as definitive therapy for acute cholecystitis Surg Endosc 9 1081–8 Occurrence Handle8553207 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK287hvVSqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00188991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. T Kiviluoto J Siren P Luukkonen E Kivilaakso (1998) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis Lancet 351 321–5 Occurrence Handle9652612 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czhsVOhsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08447-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. JL Flowers RW Bailey WA Scovill KA Zucker (1991) ArticleTitleThe Baltimore experience with laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis Am J Surg 161 388–92 Occurrence Handle1825764 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3M7lvVSqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(91)90604-C

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S Eldar E Sabo E Nash J Abrahamson I Matter (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: prospective trial World J Surg 21 540–5 Occurrence Handle9204745 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2szkvVyjtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/PL00012283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. MR Cox TG Wilson AJ Luck PL Leans RTA Padbury J Toouli (1993) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder Ann Surg 218 630–4 Occurrence Handle8239777 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FlvVersQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. S Kitano T Matsumoto M Aramaki K Kawano (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9 534–7 Occurrence Handle12541035 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s005340200069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. D Bhattachaya PS Senapati R Hurle BJ Ammori (2002) ArticleTitleUrgent versus interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a comparative study J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9 53842

    Google Scholar 

  20. U Berggren T Gordh D Grama U Haglund J Rastad D Arvidsson (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses Br J Surg 81 1362–5 Occurrence Handle7953415 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FktFaisg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. CM Lo Liu Cl ST Fan EC Lai J Wong (1998) ArticleTitleProspective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Am Surg 227 461–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3it12qsQ%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. PB Lai KH Kwong KL Leung SP Kwok AC Chan SC Chung (1998) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Br J Surg 85 764–7 Occurrence Handle9667702 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czjtVaktA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00708.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. U Berrgren T Gordh D Grama U Haglund J Rastad D Arvidsson (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses Br J Surg 81 1362–5

    Google Scholar 

  24. N Benoit M Didier R Yves V Michael J Faek L David et al. (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic approach for acute cholecystitis: retrospective study of 609 cases World J Surg 25 1352–6 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-001-0122-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. E Caratozzolo M Massani A Recordare L Bonariol M Antoniutti A Jelmoni et al. (2004) ArticleTitleUsefulness of both operative cholangiography and conversion to decrease major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 11 171–5 Occurrence Handle15235889 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00534-003-0884-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Yamashita, Y., Takada, T. & Hirata, K. A survey of the timing and approach to the surgical management of patients with acute cholecystitis in Japanese hospitals. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 13, 409–415 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-005-1088-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-005-1088-7

Key words

Navigation