Abstract
Purpose
This study seeks to determine the incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infection in high-risk neutropenic fever patients colonized with VRE and to determine patient characteristics associated with VRE infection.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective, single-center, unmatched case-control study. Fifty-three VRE-colonized, high-risk patients with neutropenic fever were identified between January 2006 and February 2009. The two most common diagnoses/conditions included acute myeloid leukemia and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Data collected included days of neutropenia, days of fever, demographic data, culture results, and antimicrobial therapy.
Results
Twenty of the 53 patients (38%) with VRE colonization developed a VRE infection. The most common VRE infections were bacteremias (26%). The presence of neutropenia lasting longer than 7 days was associated with the development of VRE infection in this high-risk population colonized with VRE. The timeframe to develop VRE infection varied from 1 day to 2 weeks.
Conclusion
For patients colonized with VRE, approximately 38% of high-risk neutropenic patients developed a VRE infection. This is the first study to specifically evaluate the incidence of VRE infections in febrile neutropenic patients colonized with VRE. Future research into the use and efficacy of empiric VRE coverage is needed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- FN:
-
febrile neutropenia
- VRE:
-
vancomycin-resistant enterococci
- HSCT:
-
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- BSI:
-
blood stream infection
- ANC:
-
absolute neutrophil count
References
Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP et al (2002) Guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis 34:730–751
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2008 Prevention and treatment of cancer-related infections. [http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/infections.pdf] Accessed 12/11/08
Bhavnani SM, Drake JA, Forrest A et al (2000) A nationwide, multicenter, case-control study comparing risk factors, treatment and outcome for vancomycin-resistant and -susceptible enterococcal bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 36:145–158
Vergis EN, Hayden MK, Chow JW et al (2001) Determination of vancomycin resistance and mortality rates in enterococcal bacteremia: a prospective multicenter study. Ann Intern Med 135:484–492
DiazGranados CA, Jernigan JA (2005) Impact of vancomycin resistance on mortality among patients with neutropenia and enterococcal bloodstream infection. Jour Infect Dis 191:588–595
Olivier CN, Blake RK, Steed LL et al (2008) Risk of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) bloodstream infection among patients colonized with VRE. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 29:404–409
Zaas AK, Song X, Tucker P et al (2002) Risk factors for development of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infection in patients with cancer who are colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Infect Dis 35:1139–1146
Matar MJ, Tarrand J, Raad I et al (2006) Colonization and infection with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus among patients with cancer. Am Jour Infect Control 34:534–536
Weinstock DM, Conlon M, Iovino C et al (2007) Colonization, bloodstream infection, and mortality caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococcus early after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 13:615–621
Pertel PE, Bernado P, Fogarty C et al (2008) Effects of prior effective therapy on the efficacy of daptomycin and ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 46:1142–1151
Gerson SL, Kaplan SL, Bruss JB et al (2002) Hematolog effects of linezolid: summary of clinical experience. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:2723–2726
Poutsiaka DD, Skiffington S, Miller KB et al (2007) Daptomycin in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia in neutropenic patients. Jour Infect 54:567–571
Smith PF, Birmingham MC, Noskin GA et al (2003) Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of linezolid for treatment of resistant Gram-positive infections in cancer patients with neutropenia. Ann Oncol 14:795–801
Jaksic B, Martinelli G, Perez-Oteyza J et al (2006) Efficacy and safety of linezolid compared to vancomycin in a randomized, double-blind study of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis 42:597–607
Poutsiaka DD, Skiffington S, Miller KB et al (2007) Daptomycin in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia in neutropenic patients. Jour of Infect 54:567–571
Eys A, Rapoport BL, Anderson R (2004) Febrile neutropenia: a prospective study to validate the Multinational Associatation of Supportive Care of Cancer (MASCC) risk-index score. Support Care Cancer 12:555–560
Dubberke ER, Hollands JM, Georgantopoulos P et al (2006) Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infections on a hematopoietic stem cell transplant unit: are the sick getting sicker? Bone Marrow Transplant 38:813–819
Rostein C, Mandell LA, Goldberg N (1997) Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis for profoundly neutropenic cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Curr Opin Oncol 4(Suppl 2):S2–S7
Cruciani M, Rampazzo R, Malena M et al (1996) Prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones in neutropenic patients: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 23:795–805
Carratala J, Fernandez-Sevilla A, Tubau F et al (1995) Emergence of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli bacteremia in neutropenic patients with cancer who received prophylactic norfloxacin. Clin Infect Dis 20:557–560
Kern WV, Andriof E, Oethinger M et al (1994) Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli at a cancer center. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38:681–687
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bossaer, J.B., Hall, P.D. & Garrett-Mayer, E. Incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infection in high-risk febrile neutropenic patients colonized with VRE. Support Care Cancer 19, 231–237 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0808-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0808-y