Skip to main content
Log in

Colonoscopy: why are general surgeons being excluded?

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The role of surgeons as endoscopists has been extensively debated in the literature, with conflicting studies published regarding the safety and efficacy of surgeons performing colonoscopies. A multitude of medical federations and societies have set various standards for granting endoscopy privileges, many with a bias against general surgeons [1, 3]. We reviewed the colonoscopy experience at our institution to evaluate differences between gastroenterologists (GI) and general (GS) and colorectal surgeons (CRS) in procedure times and complication and cecal intubation rates. Methods: Between January 2000 and July 2002, 5237 colonoscopies were performed at our institution. The data for procedure times, completion, and complication rates were collected in a prospective database. Complications were defined as perforation, bleeding, and postpolypectomy syndrome. Incomplete colonoscopies due to colitis, poor bowel preparation, or tumor obstruction were excluded. Chi-squared test was used to compare complication and cecal intubation rates between the three groups. Median procedure times were compared using the Kruskall-Wallis and Dunn’s pairwise tests. A significant p-value was defined as <0.05. Results: No differences in the complication rate was noted between the three groups: GI (0.12%), CRS (0.15%), and GS (0.11%) (p = 0.99). There was a trend toward a lower incomplete colonoscopy rate in the GS group compared to CRS and GI: 0.32% vs 0.84% and 0.36%, respectively (p = 0.07). The median colonoscopy times for GS (29 min), however, were shorter than for GI (34 min, p < 0.001) or CRS (31 min, p < 0.001). Conclusion: General surgeons perform colonoscopies expeditiously, with as low a morbidity rate and as high a completion rate as their gastroenterology or colorectal surgery colleagues. As the results of this study confirm, general surgeons should not be excluded from endoscopy suites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASGE (2000) Methods of Granting Hospital Priviledges to Perform Gastrointestinal Ensdoscopy. ASGE, Oakbrook, IL

  2. DN Reed JD Collins WJ Wyatt JE Hull MD Patton SO Dahm HH Dabideen JC Hudson DB Allen (1992) ArticleTitleCan general surgeons perform colonoscopy safety? Am J Surg 163 257–259 Occurrence Handle1739182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. InstitutionalAuthorNameSAGES (1998) ArticleTitleGuidelines for granting of Privileges for Gastrointestinal endoscopy by surgeons. Surg Endosc 12 381–382

    Google Scholar 

  4. J Sariego (2000) ArticleTitleThe role of the rural surgeon as endoscopist. Am Surg 66 1176–1178 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FptlGgtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11149594

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. SD Wexner KA Forder G Sellers N Geron A Lopes EG Weiss JJ Nogueras (1998) ArticleTitleHow well can surgeons perform colonoscopy? Surg Endosc 12 1410–1414 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900870 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FktVWhtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9822468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. SD Wexner JE Garbus JJ Singh InstitutionalAuthorNameThe SAGES Colonoscopy Outcomes Group (2000) ArticleTitleA prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies: Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines. Surg Endosc 15 251–261 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080147

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehran, A., Jaffe, P., Efron, J. et al. Colonoscopy: why are general surgeons being excluded?. Surg Endosc 17, 1971–1973 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8806-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8806-5

Keywords

Navigation