Skip to main content
Log in

Developing an integrated information system for specialized addiction treatment agencies

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article outlines the development of an integrated information system for specialized alcohol and drug treatment agencies in Ontario, Canada. The system is being developed following a strategic planning process involving provincial funding ministries and coalitions of service providers. An overview of the system's development is provided and the implementation of one subcomponent, a client-tracking system, is described. Some challenges to the implementation of this component are identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Miller WR, Brown JM, Simpson TL, Handmaker NS, et al.: What works? A methodological analysis of the alcohol treatment outcome literature. In: Hester RK, Miller WR (Eds.):Handbook of Alcoholism Treatment Approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1995, pp. 12–45.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McLellan AT, O'Brien CP, Metzger D, et al.: How effective is substance abuse treatment: Compared to what? In: O'Brien C, Jaffe JH (Eds.):Addictive States. New York: Raven Press, 1992, pp. 231–252.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hubbard RL, Marsden ME, Rachal JV, et al.:Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holder H, Longabaugh R, Miller W, et al.: The cost effectiveness of treatment for alcoholism: A first approximation.Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1991; 52:517–525.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tims FM, Fletcher BW, Hubbard RL: Treatment outcomes for drug abuse clients. In: Pickens RW, Leukefeld CG, Schuster CR (Eds.):Improving Drug Abuse Treatment. DHSS Pub. No. (ADM) 91-1754. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1991, pp. 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Panepinto WC, Simmons L: Treating the illness, not the mandate: Techniques for successful referral, engagement, and treatment of alcoholic persons.Alcoholic Treatment Quarterly 1986; 3(3):37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Williams C, Lewis D, Femino J, et al.: Overcoming barriers to identification and referral of alcoholics in a general hospital setting: One approach.Rhode Island Medical Journal 1985; 68:131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hester RK, Miller WR: Empirical guidelines for optimal client-treatment matching. In: National Institute on Drug Abuse (Ed.):Adolescent Drug Abuse: Analyses of Treatment Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1988, pp. 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences:Broadening the Base of Alcohol Treatment. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman AS, Granick S, Kreisher C, et al.: Matching adolescents who abuse drugs to treatment.American Journal on Addictions 1993; 2:232–236.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ogborne AC, Rush BR: Specialized addiction assessment/referral services in Ontario: A review of their characteristics and roles in the addiction treatment system.British Journal of Addiction 1990; 85(2):197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ridgley MS, Goldman HH, Willenbring M: Barriers to the care of persons with dual diagnosis: Organization and financial issues.Schizophrenia Bulletin 1990; 16:123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ellis K, Rush BR:Alcohol and Other Drug Services in Ontario: Results of a Provincial Survey, 1992. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ontario Ministry of Health:Partners in Action: Ontario's Substance Abuse Strategy. Toronto: Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harrison PA, Beebe TJ, Fulkerson JA, et al.: The development of patient profiles for Minnesota's treatment outcomes monitoring system.Addiction 1996; 91:687–699.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rush BR, Vincent S, Chevendra V: An overview of the Drug and Alcohol Registry of Treatment. In: Duplessis G, McCrae M, Viscaff C, Doupe S (Eds.):What Works! Innovation in Community Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Programs. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press, 1993, pp. 271–282.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Camp J, Krakow M, McCarty D, et al.: Substance abuse treatment management information systems: Balancing federal, state and service provider needs.Journal of Mental Health Administration 1992; 19:5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Caputo RK: The implications of information systems for the distribution of authority and decision making in human service organizations.Computers in Human Services 1989; 4:221–231.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan C. Ogborne Ph.D..

Additional information

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Addiction Research Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ogborne, A.C., Braun, K. & Rush, B.R. Developing an integrated information system for specialized addiction treatment agencies. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 25, 100–107 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287505

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287505

Keywords

Navigation