Skip to main content
Log in

Phenomenological methodology in the human sciences

  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The author suggests that phenomenological methodology differs from traditional methodologies both in purpose and procedure. The task of a phenomenological researcher is to “see” the logic or meaning of an experience, for any subject, rather than to discover causal connections or patterns of correlation. The nature of the task demands extensive study of a small sample, allowing the subjects to speak for themselves and to reveal the logic of their experience as lived. The author reviews verification procedures relevant to phenomenological studies and discusses the limitations inherent in phenomenological research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Some particularly interesting studies done at Duquesne University are collected in Giorgi, A.; Fisher, W. F.; and Von Eckartsberg, R., eds.,Duquesne Studies in Phenomenological Psychology, vol. 1. Pittsburgh, Duquesne University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Husserl, E.,Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, W. R. B. Gibson, trans. New York, Collier Books, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  3. One of the best explications of the text can be found in Kohàk, B.,Idea and Experience. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See, for example, Schutz, A.,The Phenomenology of the Social World, G. Walsh and F. Lehnert, trans. Evanston, Illinois, Northwestern University Press, 1967; Gurwitsch, A.,Studies in Phenomenology and Psychology. Evanston, Illinois, Northwestern University Press, 1966; and Merleau-Ponty, M.,Phenomenology of Perception, C. Smith, trans. New York, Humanities Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Husserl,Ideas, op. cit. W. R. B. Gibson, trans., §1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, D. Carr, trans. Evanston, Illinois, Northwestern University Press, 1970, §7.

  7. Husserl,Ideas, Op. cit. W. R. B. Gibson, trans., §2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., §31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Minkowski, E., “Findings in a Case of Schizophrenic Depression,” B. Bliss, trans. In May, R.; Angel, E.; and Ellenberger, H. F., eds.,Existence: A New Dimension in Psychiatry and Psychology. New York, Basic Books, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spradley, J. P.,Participant Observation. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dukes, S. Phenomenological methodology in the human sciences. J Relig Health 23, 197–203 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990785

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990785

Keywords

Navigation