Table 2:

Characteristics of physicians who provided office visits and no home visits, compared with low-volume home visit physicians (Jan. 1–Dec. 31, 2019)

CharacteristicNo. (%)*SMD
Low-volume home visit physicians
n = 6242
No home visit physicians
n = 8186
Physician age, yr, median (IQR)50 (38.0–60.0)46 (36.0–57.0)0.21
Self-reported physician gender, female2887 (46.3)4083 (49.9)0.07
Canada medical graduate
 Yes3768 (60.4)4292 (52.4)0.16
 Missing1228 (19.7)2257 (27.6)0.19
Physician urban or rural practice§
 Large urban2689 (43.1)4346 (53.1)0.20
 Medium urban1606 (25.7)2295 (28.0)0.05
 Small urban1299 (20.8)1038 (12.7)0.22
 Rural616 (9.9)480 (5.9)0.15
 Missing32 (0.5)27 (0.3)0.03
Physician medical home enrolment5301 (84.9)3992 (48.8)0.83
Physician compensation model
 Capitation1370 (21.9)915 (11.2)0.29
 Team based1950 (31.2)898 (11.0)0.51
 Enhanced fee for service1924 (30.8)2102 (25.7)0.11
 Fee for service941 (15.1)4194 (51.2)0.83
 Other57 (0.9)77 (0.9)0
  • Note: IQR = interquartile range, SMD = standardized mean difference.

  • * Unless stated otherwise.

  • Standardized mean differences greater than or equal to 10% (0.1) are considered meaningful.

  • Data from before 2014 pulled forward where possible; however, this variable is not available for physicians who joined the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario after 2014 (~25% missing in this data set).

  • § Rurality Index for Ontario score cut-offs were as follows: 0 large urban, 1–9 medium urban, 10–39 small urban and ≥ 40 rural.