Table 2:

Results of a 2-round modified Delphi exercise to establish which patient characteristics are important to consider when classifying whether an emergency department visit was primary care–like and potentially redirectable to subacute care centres by paramedics

CharacteristicRound 1, no. (%)*Round 2, no. (%)*ConsensusSpecification of parameters from expert committee
YesNoYesNo
Age, yr13 (81)3 (19)UsefulLowest age: 18 (n = 13)
Highest age: 50 (n = 1), 55 (n = 1), 65 (n = 1), 70 (n = 5),** 75 (n = 3), no upper limit (n = 2)
Sex0 (0)16 (100)Not usefulNot useful to include and/or specify
Triage acuity, CTAS16 (100)0 (0)UsefulLowest acuity: CTAS level 5 (n = 16)
Highest acuity: CTAS level 4 (n = 12),** CTAS level 3 (n = 6)
Main diagnostic category, ICD-10§9 (56)7 (44)10 (67)5 (33)No consensusConsensus was not reached among the Delphi committee
Comorbidities4 (25)12 (75)Not usefulNot useful to include and/or specify
Specialist consult performed in ED15 (94)1 (6)UsefulInclude only visits that did not receive a specialist consult in the ED (n = 15)
Outcome of ED visit13 (81)3 (19)UsefulDischarged from ED (n = 13)
Admitted to hospital (n = 1)
Transfer to another acute care facility directly from ED (n = 1)
Left after triage, no medical assessment (n = 6)
Time from triage to ED outcome2 (12)14 (88)Not usefulNot useful to include and/or specify
Return to ED within ≤ 30 d7 (44)9 (56)3 (20)12 (80)Not usefulNot useful to include and/or specify
  • Note: CTAS = Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale, ED = emergency department, ICD-10 = International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision.

  • * Consensus set at 75% agreement of all experts.

  • Fifteen of the 16 experts participated in Round 2.

  • Only experts who answered “Yes” to the consensus question were included to specify parameters.

  • § Category did not receive consensus after Round 2.

  • Indicates the lower bound of a characteristic parameter.

  • ** Indicates the upper bound of a characteristic parameter.