Table 3:

Association between GCD at enrolment and health care resource use during hospitalization

OutcomeUnadjusted rate ratio (95% CI)Adjusted rate ratio (95% CI)
Continuous
All days LOS*
 Resuscitative careRef.Ref.
 Medical care1.64 (1.26–2.13)1.42 (1.10–1.83)
 Comfort care1.73 (0.92–3.26)1.26 (0.68–2.36)
 No GCD0.75 (0.44–1.27)0.76 (0.45–1.27)
Resource Intensity Weight
 Resuscitative careRef.Ref.
 Medical care1.20 (1.07–1.34)1.14 (1.02–1.28)
 Comfort care1.55 (1.19–2.03)1.13 (0.87–1.48)
 No GCD1.00 (0.80–1.24)0.99 (0.80–1.23)
DichotomousUnadjusted relative risk (95% CI)Adjusted relative risk (95% CI)
Inpatient palliative care referral, yes
 Resuscitative careRef.Ref.
 Medical care3.88 (1.96–7.7)3.58 (1.75–7.33)
 Comfort care17.63 (9.21–34.01)9.32 (4.32–20.08)
 No GCD§
Flagged intervention, any
 Resuscitative careRef.Ref.
 Medical care0.98 (0.92–1.04)0.98 (0.48–2.02)
 Comfort care1.11 (0.95–1.31)1.06 (0.49–2.28)
 No GCD0.91 (0.81–1.01)0.90 (0.39–2.07)
  • Note: CI = confidence interval, GCD = Goals of Care Designation, LOS = length of stay, Ref. = reference category.

  • * Truncated negative binomial regression adjusted for age at enrolment, sex, race and ethnicity (white v. other), Clinical Frailty Scale score (well, mildly frail, severely frail), weighted Charlson Comorbidity Index score (low, moderate–high) and city. Truncated at 2 given patients were ineligible during the first 48 hours of an admission.

  • γ-log link regression adjusted for age at enrolment, sex, race and ethnicity (white v. other), Clinical Frailty Scale score (well, mildly frail, severely frail), weighted Charlson Comorbidity Index score (low, moderate–high) and city.

  • Modified Poisson regression model adjusted for age at enrolment, sex, race and ethnicity (white v. other), Clinical Frailty Scale score (well, mildly frail, severely frail), weighted Charlson Comorbidity Index score (low, moderate–high) and city.

  • § Had no inpatient palliative care referral, so omitted from analysis.