Innovators (n = 23 respondents) |
Innovation has been spread to new context(s) | | Innovation spread:
No innovation spread or don’t know:
|
Yes | 9 (39) |
Not yet, but in progress | 3 (13) |
No | 7 (30) |
Don’t know | 2 (9) |
Missing or not applicable | 2 (9) |
Symposium sparked other new ideas, opportunities or projects | | New ideas sparked by symposium:
Useful networking and new collaborations Stimulated discussions on new projects Ideas for knowledge translation Ideas for new resources for innovations No new ideas sparked by symposium:
|
Yes | 11 (48) |
No | 12 (52) |
Clinical leads (n = 25 respondents) |
Adopted 1 or more symposium innovations | | Reason for not having adopted an innovation:
Not adopted yet, but ongoing conversations on possible implementation Lack of resources to implement innovation Competing priorities and change fatigue (e.g., new electronic medical record)
|
Yes | 18 (72) |
If yes, degree to which it is perceived to have improved the primary health care team’s experience, mean ± SD‡ | 6.89 ± 2.00 |
If yes, degree to which it is perceived to have improved the patient experience, mean ± SD‡ | 6.32 ± 2.8 |
No | 7 (28) |
Symposium sparked other new ideas, opportunities or projects | | New ideas sparked by symposium:
No new ideas sparked by symposium:
|
Yes | 15 (60) |
No | 10 (40) |