Innovators (n = 21 respondents) |
Intend to follow up with interested clinical leads and Dragon-Facilitators | No intention of following up (n = 1): not applicable |
Yes | 20 (95) |
No | 1 (5) |
Expected method of follow-up with interested parties (could select multiple answers) | Follow-up method to be determined with teams based on mutual interests |
Individually (email or phone) | 17 (85) |
Follow-up meeting | 6 (30) |
Create a committee | 4 (20) |
Would recommend the symposium to a colleague | Would not recommend symposium (n = 1): did not meet current needs |
Yes | 19 (90) |
No | 1 (5) |
Missing | 1 (5) |
Would like to be invited to a second edition | Symposium highlights:
Excellence of the innovations and format Motivation generated by positive leaders Networking between stakeholders
|
Yes | 20 (95) |
No | 1 (5) |
Clinical leads and Dragon-Facilitators (n = 61 respondents) |
Symposium format met the objective of discovering new innovations | Innovation discovered:
Symposium format:
Highly dynamic format Enjoyed “shopping” for innovations Insufficient time to see all innovators Difficult to target which innovators to visit
|
Agree | 53 (86) |
Disagree | 4 (7) |
Missing | 4 (7) |
Likelihood of adopting or supporting an innovation in the next year, mean ± SD† | 8.02 ± 1.63 | – |
Would recommend the symposium to a colleague | | Would not recommend symposium (n = 1): good intentions, but did not meet needs |
Yes | 59 (96) |
No | 1 (2) |
Missing | 1 (2) |
Would like to be invited to a second edition | Symposium highlights:
|
Yes | 59 (96) |
No | 1 (2) |
Missing | 1 (2) |