Table 2:

Scenario analyses*

ScenarioCost difference, $QALY differenceICER
Base case (default values)−76430.04Dominant
Only significant differences in comparative effectiveness included−74230.02Dominant
Long-term time horizon (20 yr, public-payer perspective)61100.92$6624
Younger patient population (50 yr)76430.04Dominant
Patient population 70% female−76430.04Dominant
No difference in asynchrony between PAV+ mode and PSV−66580.03Dominant
PSV also has purchase cost ($13 500)−77610.04Dominant
Per-day total hospital costs: intensive care unit $3592, general ward $113528−94080.04Dominant
Per-day direct hospital costs: intensive care unit $1732.90, general ward $499.7029−58320.04Dominant
Canadian efficacy data only15−80800.00Cost saving
Alternative RR for successful spontaneous breathing trial, OR 1.1647−71230.03Dominant
Alternative utility value assumed for mechanical ventilation, 0.2922−76430.03Dominant
  • Note: ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, OR = odds ratio, PAV+ mode = proportional-assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors, PSV = pressure-support ventilation, QALY = quality-adjusted life year, RR = relative risk.

  • * Results are presented as PAV+ mode versus standard-care PSV, with difference in costs over difference in QALYs. The associated ICER is shown; in cases in which costs decrease and QALYs increase, the ICER is taken as dominant.

  • Costs in 2017 Canadian dollars.

  • Costs and quality of life utilities (measured with the EuroQoL EQ-5D instrument32) incurred after the first year are discounted at 1.5% per annum, in line with CAFTH guidelines.30 Annual utility decrements are also applied in the model after the first year.