Table 1:

Parameters of adapted Markov cohort cost-utility model*

ParameterBase caseDistribution
Patient cohort demographic characteristics
Age, mean ± SD, yr67 ± 1215Normal
Female sex (SE), %39.7 (0.13)33β
Patient outcomes in acute phase of mechanical ventilation
Patients with clusters of ineffective efforts, mean (estimated 95% CI), %38 (29.1 to 47.3)33β
Patient asynchrony on entering model
Asynchrony > 10% at initiation of mechanical ventilation if clusters of ineffective efforts, % ± SD8.5 ± 1.833β
Asynchrony > 10% at initiation of mechanical ventilation if no clusters of ineffective efforts, % ± SD1.5 ± 1.033β
Reference efficacy standard of care (PSV), mean (95% CI)
Duration of mechanical ventilation, d8.1 (4.5 to 28.3)34Normal
Time in intensive care unit, d12.6 (7.4 to 33.3)34§Normal
Time in hospital, d43.5 (18.6 to 68.4)34§Normal
Spontaneous breathing trial success, %77.9 (73.8 to 82.1)23β
Liberation success, % (95% CI)85.3 (85.1 to 85.6)35β
Adverse event rates, mean (95% CI), %
Tracheostomy26.0 (8.1 to 44.0)15β
Ventilator-associated pneumonia8.8 (5.7 to 11.9)34β
Nosocomial infection0.85 (0.66 to 1.04)36β
Intensive care unit death25.4 (20.7 to 30.1)34β
Hospital death30.3 (25.3 to 35.3)34β
Postdischarge death
 Year 112.5 (12.4 to 12.6)37β
 Year 219.3 (19.2 to 19.5)37β
 Year 327.5 (27.3 to 27.7)37β
 Year 4onward Life tablesβ
Comparative effectiveness, PAV+ mode v. PSV**
Total duration of mechanical ventilation, mean (95% CI), d−1.53 (−2.24 to −0.83)Normal
Intensive care unit length of stay, mean (95% CI), d−1.54 (−2.19 to −0.90)Normal
Hospital length of stay, mean (95% CI), d−1.83 (−2.51 to −1.16)Normal
Successful weaning/liberation, OR (95% CI)1.49 (0.59 to 3.79)Log-normal
Intensive care unit death, OR (95% CI)0.70 (0.41 to 1.20)Log-normal
Hospital death, OR (95% CI)0.70 (0.40 to 1.22)Log-normal
Tracheostomy, OR (95% CI)0.76 (0.44 to 1.31)Log-normal
Extubation failure/reintubation, OR (95% CI)0.52 (0.25 to 1.08)Log-normal
Asynchrony index ≥ 10, OR (95% CI)0.13 (0.07 to 0.23)Log-normal
Costs††
Intensive care unit, cost per day, mean (range of reported means), $2765 (2354–3690)38γ
General ward, cost per day, mean (range of reported means), $019 (717–1400)38γ
Mechanical ventilation initiation, cost per event, mean (95% CI), $139 (125 to 153)39γ
Mechanical ventilation maintenance, cost per day, mean (95% CI), $851 (766 to 936)39γ
Tracheostomy, cost per event, mean (95% CI), $4193 (3908 to 4477)40γ
Ventilator-associated pneumonia, cost per day, mean (95% CI), $58 (30 to 73)41,42γ
Other nosocomial infection, cost per event, mean (± 10%), $870 (783 to 956)43γ
PSV, purchase cost, $0‡‡γ
PAV+ mode, 1-time purchase cost, $27 00022§§γ
After discharge, annual cost, mean (95% CI), $
 Year 1–213 707 (6241 to 37 631)44γ
 Year 3 onward10 032 (5835 to 17 169)44γ
Ventilator-associated pneumonia, additional length of stay, median (range), d9.5 (8.8–10.1)27Normal
Health state utility, mean (95% CI)
Baseline0.776 (0.677 to 0.899)22Normal
Mechanical ventilation−0.390 (−0.590 to 0.090)22Normal
Intensive care unit0.402 (0.362 to 0.442)22Normal
Hospital0.520 (0.450 to 0.590)22Normal
After discharge to 1 yr0.550 (0.480 to 0.610)22Normal
Adverse event disutility
Tracheostomy0¶¶Normal
Ventilator-associated pneumonia0***Normal
Extubation failure0¶¶Normal
  • Note: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio, PAV+ mode = proportional-assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors, PSV = pressure-support ventilation, SD = standard deviation, SE = standard error.

  • * Canadian data in italics.

  • We made the choice of distribution to reflect the uncertainty of each parameter from the perspective of population-level uncertainty as opposed to uncertainty at the individual patient level.

  • See Figure 1.

  • § In the analysis by Sinuff and colleagues,34 no upper bound was presented owing to the patient’s remaining in hospital. For our calculations, we assumed that the upper bound is given by: mean + (mean – lower bound).

  • Used for scenario analyses only.

  • ** Seven clinical studies comparing PAV+ mode to PSV1517,2326 were identified by K.J.B. and in systematic reviews.45,46 As these systematic reviews did not report on all required outcomes, and no single study presented robust clinical data on the required model inputs, we determined the comparative efficacy of PAV+ mode versus PSV by means of a pragmatic meta-analysis (Appendix 1).

  • †† 2017 Canadian dollars.

  • ‡‡ Conservative assumption.

  • §§ Assumed to be $24.64 per day of use, assuming a 5-year life cycle and that the ventilator is in use on 60% of days. Probabilistic model inputs (used for the probabilistic sensitivity analysis) were based on input variance, calculated from reported CIs.

  • ¶¶ Assumed none in addition to mechanical ventilation.

  • *** Additional duration of mechanical ventilation is assumed to cover the disutility.