Table 1:

Key parameters and data sources

ParameterBase case value (range)*Data sources
Key Lyme disease probability parameters and data sources
Lyme disease
 Probability of high-risk exposure0.628 (0.471–0.786)Personal communication, PHO
 LD incidence rates, per 100 000 (varies by age and sex)2.9–13.9 (0.000029–0.000139)Nelder et al. 20185
 Probability of clinical diagnosis after EM rash, high-risk exposure area0.583 (0.437–0.729)Henry et al. 201215
 Probability of clinical diagnosis after EM rash, low-risk exposure area0.261 (0.196–0.326)Henry et al. 201215
Diagnostics
 Sensitivity, early localized0.463 (0.391–0.537)§Waddell et al. 201618
 Sensitivity, early disseminated0.897 (0.783–0.954)§Waddell et al. 201618
 Sensitivity, late disseminated0.994 (0.957–0.999)§Waddell et al. 201618
 Specificity, early localized0.993 (0.983–0.997)§Waddell et al. 201618
 Specificity, early disseminated0.997 (0.984–0.999)§Waddell et al. 201618
 Specificity, late disseminated0.993 (0.985–0.997)§Waddell et al. 201618
 Probability of testing (varies by presence or absence of sequelae)0.402–0.805 (0.30–0.98)Henry et al. 201215
 Delay in results1–2 wkPHO 201717
Treatment
 Treatment efficacy
  Erythema migrans0.85 (0.80–1.00)Magid et al. 199219
  Arthritic sequelae0.85 (0.40–0.80)Liu et al. 198920
  Cardiac sequelae0.90 (0.80–1.00)Steere et al. 199321
  Neurologic sequelae0.90 (0.76–0.97)Logigian and Steere 199222 Dattwyler et al. 198823 Karlsson et al. 199424
 Oral treatment completion0.90 (0.68–1.00)Magid et al. 199219
 IV treatment completion0.99 (0.75–1.00)Magid et al. 199219
 Probability of adverse event, oral0.04 (0.03–0.05)Shadick et al. 200110
 Probability of adverse event, IV0.06 (0.05–0.08)Shadick et al. 200110
Outcomes
 Probability of hospitalization0.05 (0.04–0.06)Shing et al. 201925
 Length of hospitalization, d7.9 (3.8–12.1)§Shing et al. 201925
 EM rash0.80 (0.60–1.00)Shadick et al. 200110
 Probability of developing sequelae (varies by LD stage and sex)0.10–0.17 (0.08–0.21)Unpublished data from cited study26**
 Arthritic sequelae (M, F)0.56–0.63 (0.41–0.76)Unpublished data from cited study26**
 Cardiac sequelae (F, M)0.43–0.48 (0.29–0.53)Unpublished data from cited study26**
 Cognitive sequelae (F, M)0.37–0.44 (0.29–0.58)Unpublished data from cited study26**
 Cranial nerve palsy sequelae (F, M)0.11–0.24 (0.08–0.26)Unpublished data from cited study26**
 Multiple EM sequelae (M, F)0.22–0.36 (0.16–0.40)Unpublished data from cited study26**
 Meningitis or polyneuropathy sequelae (F, M)0.06–0.11 (0.12–0.24)Unpublished data from cited study26**
Key utility parameters and data sources
Utilities
 Healthy, stratified by age and sex0.62–0.90 (0.38–0.98)§Guertin et al. 201813
 Arthritic sequelae0.69 (0.51–0.86)Shadick et al. 200110
 Cardiac sequelae0.61 (0.38–0.78)Shadick et al. 200110
 Cognitive sequelae0.60 (0.37–0.73)Shadick et al. 200110
 Erythema migrans0.80 (0.70–0.93)Shadick et al. 200110
 Cranial nerve palsy0.61 (0.36–0.81)Shadick et al. 200110
 Meningitis or polyneuropathy0.52 (0.27–0.73)Shadick et al. 200110
 PTLDS0.54 (0.30–0.70)Shadick et al. 200110
 Minor adverse events, disutility0.05 (0.04–0.06)Eckman et al. 199712
 Major adverse events, disutility0.10 (0.08–0.13)Eckman et al. 199712
 Oral treatment, disutility0.01 (0.00–0.01)Eckman et al. 199712
 Intravenous treatment, disutility0.03 (0.02–0.04)Eckman et al. 199712
  • Note: CI = confidence interval, EM = erythema migrans, F = female, IQR = interquartile range, IV = intravenous, LD = Lyme disease, M = male, PHO = Public Health Ontario, PTLDS = post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome.

  • * Type of range varies by study, as indicated.

  • Range represents plausible range.

  • Range represents full range.

  • § Range represents 95% CI.

  • Range represents IQR.

  • ** Study authors provided these data.