Table 3:

Suitability of the faxed referrals for eConsult, as assessed by a rheumatologist*

ResponseNo. (%)
n = 300
I could likely answer this consultation with an eConsult, thus likely avoiding a face-to-face consultation59 (19.7)
I could possibly answer this consultation with an eConsult, but information is missing:62 (20.7)
 Requires further history to address this question, which could be obtained with exchange via eConsult54/62 (87.1)
 Requires further investigations to address this question, which could be obtained with exchange via eConsult50/62 (80.6)
I could provide some advice regarding this consultation via eConsult, but the patient still likely requires a face-to-face consultation because96 (32.0)
 Requires physical exam to address the question62/96 (64.6)
 Requires further investigations (blood work, imaging, etc.) to address the question, which is not amenable to eConsult exchange23/96 (24.0)
 Requires rheumatologist to follow patient owing to complexity/standard of care for given diagnosis/chronic drug therapy that requires rheumatology expertise35/96 (36.5)
 Referred by another specialist18/96 (18.8)
 Likely requires a procedure by a rheumatologist2/96 (2.1)
 Other0 (0)
I am unable to provide advice via eConsult, because83 (27.7)
 No clear question to be answered2/83 (2.4)
 Requires physical exam to address the question16/83 (19.3)
 Requires further investigations (blood work, imaging, etc.) to address the question, which is not amenable to eConsult exchange6/83 (7.2)
 Requires rheumatologist to follow patient owing to complexity/standard of care for given diagnosis/chronic drug therapy that requires rheumatology expertise65/83 (78.3)
 Referred by another specialist47/83 (56.6)
 Likely requires a procedure by a rheumatologist1/83 (1.2)
 Other1/83 (1.2)
  • * It was possible to choose multiple reasons within each broader category.