Table 3:

Results of individual patient-level analysis of peritoneal dialysis use 90 days after initiation of long-term dialysis before and after fee changes*

ModelORDifferences-in-differences estimator (95% CI)
Fee-for-service post–preSalaried post–pre
Fee change 1 (Apr. 1, 2002)
Unadjusted0.811.120.72 (0.35–1.48)
Adjusted§0.830.940.89 (0.44–1.81)
Fee change 2 (Apr. 1, 2007)
Unadjusted1.100.881.24 (0.86–1.80)
Adjusted§1.030.891.15 (0.73–1.83)
Fee change 3 (Apr. 1, 2009)
Unadjusted1.170.901.31 (0.87–1.80)
Adjusted§1.310.871.52 (0.96–2.40)
  • Note: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio.

  • * The same subset of data served for the periods after fee change 2 and before fee change 3.

  • Fee change 1: weekly fee-for-service remuneration for peritoneal dialysis introduced at $32.16; fee change 2: weekly fee-for-service remuneration for peritoneal dialysis increased from $49.15 to $70.94; fee change 3: weekly fee-for-service remuneration for all patients receiving dialysis $135.

  • The differences-in-differences estimator is the odds ratio for peritoneal dialysis use in the fee-for-service group after versus before a fee change, divided by the odds ratio for peritoneal dialysis use in the salaried group after versus before a fee change.

  • § Adjusted model controlled for patient-level covariates shown in Tables 1 and 2.