Table 2:

Characteristics of included primary studies (reviews 1 and 2)

Investigator (review)Study designEligibility criteriaCountryStudy periodTotal sample sizeSource of fundingStudy quality
Brown et al., 201520 (review 1)Retrospective cohort
  • Trans-related diagnosis (i.e., gender identity disorder, gender identity disorder not otherwise specified, transvestic fetishism, transsexualism)

  • Veteran

  • Accessed medical and mental health services at VHA facility

United States17 yr (Oct. 1, 1996, to Sept. 30, 2013)5135Authors employed by VHA
No grant or commercial funding
Fair*
Gooren et al., 201321 (review 1)Retrospective cohort
  • Trans person

  • Minimum 6-yr follow-up

The Netherlands38 yr (1975 to Dec. 31, 2012)3102Two authors received noncommercial supportFair*
Weyers et al., 201023 (review 2)Cross-sectional
  • Dutch-speaking trans women

  • Received sex reassignment surgery at least 6 mo before enrolment

  • Consulted Ghent University Hospital gender team during previous 12 mo

Belgium4 mo (Mar–June 2007)50First author received commercial supportPoor
Kuroda et al., 200822 (review 1)Retrospective cohort
  • Trans men

  • Underwent mastectomy at surgical institute

Japan9 yr (1998–2006)186NRPoor*
  • Note: NR = not reported, VHA = Veterans Health Administration.

  • * Assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.16,33 Detailed results of the quality assessment are provided in Supplementary Table S2, Appendix 4 (available at www.cmajopen.ca/content/7/3/E598/suppl/DC1).

  • No formal critical appraisal tool was used; methodological quality was assessed by considering key methodological components such as the selection of participants, and exposure and outcome assessments.

  • Detailed results of the quality assessment are provided in Supplementary Table S3, Appendix 4.