Table 5: Factors associated with progression to TB disease from infection between November 2011 and November 2012
VariableNo. (%) of participants with new or prior TB infection*Crude OR (95% CI)†Adjusted OR (95% CI)†‡
Disease (n = 44)No disease (n = 89)
Age, yr
    < 1512 (27)19 (21)ReferenceReference
    15-2922 (50)39 (44)0.9 (0.4-2.3)1.0 (0.3-2.8)
     3010 (23)31 (35)0.5 (0.2-1.3)1.0 (0.3-3.0)
Sex
    Male22 (50)40 (45)ReferenceReference
    Female22 (50)49 (55)0.8 (0.4-1.5)0.8 (0.4-1.7)
Tobacco smoking
    Not current smoker15 (34)26 (30)ReferenceNot in model
    Current smoker29 (66)62 (70)0.8 (0.4-1.8)
Annual personal income, $§
    < 20 00031 (77)51 (60)ReferenceReference
     20 0009 (23)34 (40)0.4 (0.2-1.05)0.4 (0.2-1.1)
Prior TB infection
Not documented TST-positive before November 201135 (79)53 (60)ReferenceReference
Documented TST-positive before November 20119 (21)36 (40)0.4 (0.2-0.8)0.4 (0.2-0.9)
Heating method
    Forced air41 (93)83 (93)ReferenceNot in model
    Radiator3 (7)6 (7)1.0 (0.3-3.4)
No. of people per room¶
Among participants living with a smear-positive person1.9 ± 0.41.6 ± 0.61.3 (1.1-1.6)1.3 (1.2-1.5)
Among participants not living with a smear-positive person1.2 ± 0.51.1 ± 0.51.1 (0.9-1.2)1.1 (0.9-1.3)
Ventilation with heating on relative to median (1.66 air changes per hour)**
    < Median36 (82)67 (75)ReferenceNot in model
     Median8 (18)22 (25)0.7 (0.3-1.5)
Volume of living area relative to median (65.5 m3)
    < Median13 (30)44 (49)ReferenceNot in model
     Median27 (61)59 (66)2.3 (1.1-5.0)
Visited any dwelling used for social activities21 (48)50 (56)0.7 (0.3-1.6)Not in model
Lived with smear-positive person††13 (30)16 (18)1.9 (0.9-4.1)0.8 (0.3-1.8)

Note: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio, TB = tuberculosis, TST = tuberculin skin testing.

*Except where stated otherwise.

†CIs where OR excludes 1.0 are in bold.

‡Adjusted OR from the model that included all variables, except where indicated, plus an interaction term between occupancy and living with a smear-positive person that was statistically significant (p = 0.04).

§Eight participants with missing data on income status were excluded from the final model.

¶Interaction term between occupancy and living with a smear-positive person was not statistically significant in univariate analysis (p = 0.1), and was significant in the multivariate model (p = 0.04). As an example of interpretation, if we were to compare 2 participants who did not live together and whose dwellings differed in occupancy by 1 person per room, the unadjusted odds of disease would be 30% higher (as the crude OR is 1.3) for the participant living in the home with the greater number of people per room.

**In the living area. Lowest ventilation measured in the living area also was not associated with disease (data not shown).

††Adjusted OR shows association between living with someone with smear-positive TB and disease if living in a dwelling with 1.2 persons per room (chosen because it was the median number of people per room).