Table 3: Factors associated with acquisition of TB infection between November 2011 and November 2012
Variable†No. (%) of participants*Crude OR (95% CI)‡Adjusted OR (95% CI)‡§
Newly infected(n = 88)Uninfected (n = 67)
Age, yr
    < 1530 (34)45 (67)ReferenceReference
    15-2944 (50)17 (25)3.9 (2.1-7.1)5.5 (2.8-10.7)
     3014 (16)5 (8)4.2 (1.5-12.0)5.2 (1.5-18.0)
Sex
    Male40 (45)31 (46)ReferenceReference
    Female48 (54)36 (54)1.0 (0.6-1.9)0.8 (0.4-1.8)
Tobacco smoking
    Not current smoker30 (34)40 (60)ReferenceNot in model
    Current smoker58 (66)27 (40)2.9 (1.5-5.4)
Annual personal income, $
    < 20 00055 (66)36 (56)ReferenceNot in model
     20 00028 (34)28 (44)0.7 (0.3-1.5)
Heating method
    Forced air81 (92)64 (97)ReferenceNot in model
    Radiator7 (8)2 (3)2.8 (0.8-10.2)
No. of people per room,¶ mean ± SD
Among participants living with smear-positive person1.7 ± 0.61.1 ± 0.71.5 (0.9-2.3)1.8 (1.1-2.9)
Among participants not living with smear-positive person1.2 ± 0.51.3 ± 0.40.9 (0.7-1.1)0.9 (0.7-1.1)
Ventilation with heating on relative to median (1.66 air changes per hour)**
    < Median68 (77)51 (76)ReferenceNot in model
     Median20 (23)15 (22)1.0 (0.4-2.6)
Volume of living area relative to median (65.5 m3)
    < Median32 (36)31 (47)ReferenceNot in model
     Median56 (64)35 (53)1.6 (0.7-3.6)
Visited dwelling used for social activities47 (53)16 (24)3.7 (1.7-7.9)4.2 (1.8-10.1)
Lived with smear-positive person††20 (23)2 (3)9.6 (2.4-38.0)4.7 (0.95-23.2)

Note: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio, SD = standard deviation, TB = tuberculosis.

*Except where noted otherwise. One participant who had moved after the outbreak and whose dwelling could not be accessed was excluded from multivariate analysis.

†Data missing on income (n = 8), heating type (n = 1), ventilation (n = 1) and volume of living area (n = 1).

‡CIs where OR excludes 1.0 are in bold.

§Final multivariate model included all listed variables, except where indicated, plus an interaction term between occupancy and living with a smear-positive person that was statistically significant (p = 0.006).

¶Interaction term between occupancy and living with a smear-positive person was significant in univariate analysis (p < 0.05). The crude and adjusted ORs are per 0.2-unit increment in the number of people per room. This scale was chosen because it corresponds to an increment of 1 occupant in a dwelling with 5 rooms (the median number of rooms). As an example of interpretation: among those living with a smear-positive person in a dwelling with 5 rooms, if we were to compare 2 participants who did not live together and whose dwellings differed in occupancy by 1 person, the unadjusted odds of newly diagnosed infection would be 50% higher (as the OD is 1.5) for the participant living in the home with the greater number of people per room.

**In the living area. Lowest ventilation measured in the living area was also not associated with infection (data not shown).

††Adjusted OR shows association between living with someone with smear-positive TB and newly diagnosed infection if living in a dwelling with 1.2 persons per room (chosen because it was the median number of people per room).