TY - JOUR T1 - Service delivery models for injectable opioid agonist treatment in Canada: 2 sequential environmental scans JF - CMAJ Open JO - CMAJ SP - E115 LP - E124 DO - 10.9778/cmajo.20200021 VL - 9 IS - 1 AU - Erin Eydt AU - Stephanie Glegg AU - Christy Sutherland AU - Karine Meador AU - Michael Trew AU - Michel Perreault AU - Marie-Ève Goyer AU - Bernard Le Foll AU - Jeffrey Turnbull AU - Nadia Fairbairn Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/9/1/E115.abstract N2 - Background: Injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) is an emerging evidence-based option in the continuum of care for opioid use disorder in parts of Canada. Our study objective was to identify and describe iOAT programs operating during the ongoing opioid overdose crisis.Methods: We conducted 2 sequential environmental scans. Programs were eligible to participate if they were in operation as of Sept. 1, 2018, and Mar. 1, 2019. Information was collected over 2–3 months for each scan (September–October 2018, March–May 2019). Programs that participated in the first scan and newly established programs were invited to participate in the second scan. The scans included questions about location, service delivery model, clinical and operational characteristics, numbers and demographic characteristics of clients, and program barriers and facilitators. Descriptive analysis was performed.Results: We identified 14 unique programs across the 2 scans. Eleven programs located in urban centres in British Columbia and Ontario participated in the first scan. At the time of the second scan, 2 of these programs were on hold and 2 of 3 newly established programs were in Alberta. The total capacity of all participating programs was 420 clients at most. Four service delivery models were identified; iOAT was most commonly integrated within existing health and social services. All programs offered hydromorphone, and 1 program also offered diacetylmorphine. In the first scan, 73% of clients (133/183) were male; the mean age of clients was 47 years. Limited capacity, pharmacy operations and lack of diacetylmorphine access were among the most frequently reported barriers. The most commonly reported facilitators included client-centred care, client relationships and access to other health and social support.Interpretation: Evidence indicates that iOAT can be successfully implemented using diverse service delivery models. Future work should facilitate scale-up of this evidence-based treatment where gaps persist in high-risk communities. ER -