TY - JOUR T1 - Outpatient uterine assessment and treatment unit in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding: an economic modelling study JF - CMAJ Open JO - CMAJ SP - E810 LP - E818 DO - 10.9778/cmajo.20190170 VL - 8 IS - 4 AU - Alexandria Bennett AU - Kednapa Thavorn AU - Kristina Arendas AU - Doug Coyle AU - Sukhbir S. Singh Y1 - 2020/10/01 UR - http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/8/4/E810.abstract N2 - Background: Most often in Canada, the evaluation and management of abnormal uterine bleeding occurs under general anesthesia in the operating room. We aimed to assess the potential cost-effectiveness of an outpatient uterine assessment and treatment unit (UATU) compared with the current standard of care when diagnosing and treating abnormal uterine bleeding in women.Methods: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis and developed a probabilistic decision tree model to simulate the total costs and outcomes of women receiving outpatient UATU or usual care over a 1-year time horizon (Apr. 1, 2014, to Mar. 31, 2017) at a tertiary care hospital in Ontario, Canada. Probabilities, resource use and time to diagnosis and treatment were obtained from a retrospective chart review of 200 randomly selected women who presented with abnormal uterine bleeding. Results were expressed as overall cost and time savings per patient. Costs are reported in 2018 Canadian dollars.Results: Compared with usual care, care in the UATU was associated with a decrease in overall cost ($1332, 95% confidence interval [CI] −$1742 to −$1008) and a decrease in overall time to treatment (−75, 95% CI −89 to −63, d). The point at which the UATU would no longer be cost saving is if the additional cost to operate and maintain the UATU is greater than $1600 per patient.Interpretation: From the perspective of Canada’s health care system, an outpatient UATU is more cost effective than usual care and saves time. Future studies should focus on the relative efficacy of a UATU and the total budget required to operate and maintain a UATU. ER -