TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of a program using a physician assistant and an electronic patient–provider communication tool to facilitate discussions about goals of care in older adults in hospital: a pilot study JF - CMAJ Open JO - CMAJ SP - E577 LP - E584 DO - 10.9778/cmajo.20200022 VL - 8 IS - 3 AU - Monica Monchis AU - Chris Martin AU - Giulio DiDiodato Y1 - 2020/07/01 UR - http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/8/3/E577.abstract N2 - Background: Many patients receive unwanted, low-value, high-intensity care at the end of life because of poor communication with health care providers. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of using a physician assistant and an electronic tool to facilitate discussions about goals of care.Method: We conducted a pilot study for the intervention (physician assistant–led discussion using an electronic tool) from Apr. 1 to Aug. 31, 2019. Patients aged 79 years or older admitted to the Royal Victoria Hospital (Barrie, Ontario) with either (i) no documented resuscitation preferences or (ii) a request for life-sustaining treatments in the event of a life-threatening illness were eligible for the intervention. The goal of this study was to complete more than 30 interventions. The primary outcomes included the proportion of consenting eligible patients, the time required and the proportion of patients changing their resuscitation preferences.Results: A total of 763 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 337 eligible for the intervention. Of these, 49 cases were contacted for consent, and 37 interventions were completed (75.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 61.1%–86.6%). On average, the intervention required 50 minutes (standard deviation 21) to complete. Overall, 31 interventions resulted in a change in resuscitation preferences (83.7%, 95% CI 68.0%–93.8%), with 22 patients choosing to forgo any access to life-sustaining treatments in the event of a life-threatening illness (59.4%, 95% CI 42.1%–75.2%).Interpretation: In this pilot study, the intervention was completed in a minority of eligible patients and required substantial time; however, it led to many changes in resuscitation preferences. Before designing a study to evaluate its impact, the intervention needs to be revised to make it more efficient to administer. ER -