RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Family physician referral rates for lumbar spine computed tomography in Newfoundland and Labrador: a cross-sectional analysis using routinely collected data
JF CMAJ Open
JO CMAJ
FD Canadian Medical Association
SP E56
OP E59
DO 10.9778/cmajo.20190076
VO 8
IS 1
A1 Gabrielle S. Logan
A1 Bethan Copsey
A1 Holly Etchegary
A1 Patrick Parfrey
A1 Krista Mahoney
A1 Amanda Hall
YR 2020
UL http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/8/1/E56.abstract
AB Background: Reducing computed tomography (CT) examinations of the lumbar spine is one of Choosing Wisely Canada’s initial top 10 recommendations. This study’s objective was to report the age- and-sex standardized rates of lumbar spine CT ordered by family physicians in 1 health region in Newfoundland and Labrador.Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using local health data from Meditech, an electronic health record system, from 2013 to 2016 for the Eastern Health Region of Newfoundland and Labrador, the largest health region in the province. Records were included if the referral was for an adult aged 20 years or more, and CT was ordered by a family physician. Lumbar spine CT rates were contextualized with age- and sex-stratified estimates. Population estimates were provided by the Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information to calculate age- and sex-standardized rates per 100 000 people. We calculated rate ratios to test for statistical significance in differences in rates between years.Results: A total of 14 370 records were examined. The age- and sex-standardized rates of lumbar spine CT per 100 000 were 1225 in 2013, 1393 in 2014, 1556 in 2015 and 1395 in 2016. The rate ratio was 1.137 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.084–1.194) for the comparison between 2014 and 2013, 1.117 (95% CI 1.067–1.169) between 2015 and 2014, and 0.896 (95% CI 0.857–0.938) between 2016 and 2015.Interpretation: The age- and sex-standardized rates suggest that there was a steady rate of lumbar spine CT examinations being ordered by family physicians in Newfoundland and Labrador in 2013–2016. Although all rate ratios were statistically significant, the magnitude of the difference between years is likely not clinically relevant. These rates are important because they serve as a benchmark for future initiatives to reduce unnecessary referrals for lumbar spine CT.