TY - JOUR T1 - Diagnostic accuracy and yield of screening tests for atrial fibrillation in the family practice setting: a multicentre cohort study JF - CMAJ Open JO - CMAJ SP - E308 LP - E315 DO - 10.9778/cmajo.20180001 VL - 6 IS - 3 AU - F. Russell Quinn AU - David J. Gladstone AU - Noah M. Ivers AU - Roopinder K. Sandhu AU - Lisa Dolovich AU - Andrea Ling AU - Juliet Nakamya AU - Chinthanie Ramasundarahettige AU - Paul A. Frydrych AU - Sam Henein AU - Ken Ng AU - Valerie Congdon AU - Richard V. Birtwhistle AU - Richard Ward AU - Jeffrey S. Healey Y1 - 2018/07/01 UR - http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/6/3/E308.abstract N2 - Background: Detection of undiagnosed or undertreated (“actionable”) atrial fibrillation could increase the use of appropriate oral anticoagulant therapy and reduce the risk of stroke. We sought to compare newer screening technologies with a pulse-check for the detection of atrial fibrillation and to determine whether the detection of actionable atrial fibrillation increases the use of oral anticoagulant agents.Methods: This prospective multicentre cohort study involved 22 primary care clinics. We recruited participants aged 65 years and older who were attending routine appointments. Each participant underwent 3 methods of screening: a 30-second radial pulse-check; single-lead electrocardiogram; and screening by blood pressure machine with atrial fibrillation detection algorithms. Participants who received a positive result on 1 or more test underwent 12-lead electrocardiogram with or withour 24-hour Holter. Screening tests were compared using the McNemar test. Participants with confirmed atrial fibrillation received follow-up at 90 days.Results: The mean age of participants was 73.7 (± 6.9) years, and 53.4% of participants were female. Of 2171 patients, we had data from all 3 screening tests for 2054 patients. Both single-lead electrocardiogram and the blood pressure device showed superior specificity compared with pulse-check (p < 0.001 for each). Fifty-six patients (2.7%) had confirmed atrial fibrillation: 12 patients had newly detected atrial fibrillation (none of the patients were using anticoagulation agents), and 44 patients had previously diagnosed atrial fibrillation (42 patients were receiving anticoagulant therapy, 2 were not). Thus, 14 patients had actionable atrial fibrillation (0.7%). By 90 days, 77% of patients with actionable atrial fibrillation had started anticoagulant therapy.Interpretation: Newer screening technologies showed superior specificity compared with a pulse-check. Screening detected undiagnosed or undertreated atrial fibrillation in 0.7% of participants, and 77% started appropriate anticoagulant therapy.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT02262351. ER -