TY - JOUR T1 - Validity and utility of ICD-10 administrative health data for identifying ST- and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction based on physician chart review JF - CMAJ Open SP - E413 LP - E418 DO - 10.9778/cmajo.20150060 VL - 3 IS - 4 AU - Alka B. Patel AU - Hude Quan AU - Robert C. Welsh AU - Jessica Deckert-Sookram AU - Wayne Tymchak AU - Sunil Sookram AU - Ian Surdhar AU - Padma Kaul Y1 - 2015/10/02 UR - http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/3/4/E413.abstract N2 - Background: Health care administrative databases are useful for assessing the population-level burden of disease and examining issues related to access, costs and quality of care. In these databases, the diagnoses and procedures are coded with the use of the World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases (ICD). We examined the validity of 2 ICD-10 coding definitions for categorizing patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) as having ST-elevation MI (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation MI (non-STEMI).Methods: Charts of patients with acute MI discharged between April and June 2007 from 3 hospitals in Edmonton, were reviewed to define the acute MI subtype (i.e., STEMI v. non-STEMI). The agreement between clinician chart review and STEMI/non-STEMI classification based on the standard (ICD-10 I21.x) and the supplementary electrocardiogram (ECG) codes (R94.3x) was determined. We assessed the effect of these alternative definitions on in-hospital mortality estimates by applying them to the data for all patients with acute MI admitted to hospital in the province from April 2007 to March 2010.Results: Of the 297 patients, 49.2% were identified as having STEMI based on chart review, 44.4% using the standard definition, and 44.1% using the ECG definition. Both the standard and ECG definitions provided high agreement (92% for STEMI and 100% for non-STEMI) with the chart review classification. In the larger population-level cohort (n = 15 148), use of the standard definition or the ECG definition did not affect in-hospital mortality estimates for patients with STEMI and those with non-STEMI.Interpretation: The standard definition appears equivalent to the definition using supplementary ECG codes to subcategorize patients with acute MI as having STEMI or non-STEMI. These findings may be relevant for the development of later versions of ICD codes. ER -