Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for Authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission Checklist
    • Publication Fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial Policies
    • Editorial Process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Manuscript Progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for Authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission Checklist
    • Publication Fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial Policies
    • Editorial Process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Manuscript Progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CMAJ Open on Twitter
Research

The top 10 retinoblastoma research priorities in Canada as determined by patients, clinicians and researchers: a patient-oriented priority-setting partnership

Kaitlyn Flegg, Maxwell J. Gelkopf, Sarah A. Johnson and Helen Dimaras; for the Canadian Retinoblastoma Research Advisory Board Priority Setting Steering Committee
June 09, 2020 8 (2) E420-E428; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190221
Kaitlyn Flegg
Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Flegg, Gelkopf, Dimaras), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Neuroscience (Johnson), Evelyn F. and William L. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Dimaras), Faculty of Medicine, and Division of Clinical Public Health (Dimaras), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program (Dimaras) and Centre for Global Child Health (Dimaras), SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maxwell J. Gelkopf
Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Flegg, Gelkopf, Dimaras), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Neuroscience (Johnson), Evelyn F. and William L. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Dimaras), Faculty of Medicine, and Division of Clinical Public Health (Dimaras), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program (Dimaras) and Centre for Global Child Health (Dimaras), SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah A. Johnson
Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Flegg, Gelkopf, Dimaras), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Neuroscience (Johnson), Evelyn F. and William L. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Dimaras), Faculty of Medicine, and Division of Clinical Public Health (Dimaras), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program (Dimaras) and Centre for Global Child Health (Dimaras), SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen Dimaras
Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Flegg, Gelkopf, Dimaras), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Neuroscience (Johnson), Evelyn F. and William L. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Dimaras), Faculty of Medicine, and Division of Clinical Public Health (Dimaras), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program (Dimaras) and Centre for Global Child Health (Dimaras), SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1:

    Overview of James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership method.

  • Figure 2:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2:

    Flow diagram showing priority-setting process for retinoblastoma research. Note: CRRAB = Canadian Retinoblastoma Research Advisory Board.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 1:

    Demographic characteristics of the Canadian Retinoblastoma Research Advisory Board working group, Priority Setting Steering Committee and workshop participants

    CharacteristicGroup; no. (%) of participants
    Working groupSteering committeeWorkshop
    Patients
    n = 1
    Nonpatients
    n = 9
    Patients
    n = 4
    Nonpatients
    n = 11
    Patients
    n = 10
    Nonpatients
    n = 10
    Sex
     Male0 (0)1 (11)0 (0)3 (27)1 (10)3 (30)
     Female1 (100)8 (89)4 (100)8 (73)9 (90)7 (70)
    Category
     Parent0 (0)NA2 (50)NA6 (60)NA
     Survivor1 (100)NA2 (50)NA4 (40)NA
     ClinicianNA3 (33)NA4 (36)NA3 (30)
      Genetic counsellorNA2 (22)NA2 (18)NA0 (0)
      Child life specialistNA0 (0)NA2 (18)NA0 (0)
      NurseNA0 (0)NA0 (0)NA1 (10)
      Ophthalmic imaging specialistNA1 (11)NA0 (0)NA1 (10)
      OphthalmologistNA0 (0)NA0 (0)NA1 (10)
     Clinician-scientistNA1 (11)NA3 (27)NA1 (10)
      OphthalmologistNA1 (11)NA2 (18)NA1 (10)
      OncologistNA0 (0)NA1 (9)NA0 (0)
     ResearcherNA1 (11)NA2 (18)NA4 (40)
     TraineeNA4 (44)NA2 (18)NA2 (20)
    Place of residence
     Ontario0 (0)8 (89)2 (50)8 (73)6 (60)8 (80)
     Alberta0 (0)1 (11)1 (25)2 (18)3 (30)1 (10)
     British Columbia0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (9)0 (0)1 (10)
     Other1 (100)0 (0)1 (25)0 (0)1 (10)0 (0)
    • Note: NA = not applicable.

    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 2:

    Demographic characteristics of online survey respondents

    CharacteristicNo. (%) of respondents*
    Patients
    n = 38
    Nonpatients
    n = 21
    Age, yr, mean ± SD38 ± 846 ± 9†
    Sex
     Female34 (89)16 (76)
     Male4 (11)5 (24)
    Category
     Parent24 (63)NA
     Parent and survivor2 (5)NA
     Survivor8 (21)NA
     Parent and spouse of survivor2 (5)NA
     Family1 (3)NA
     Unaffected RB1 mutation carrier and parent1 (3)NA
     ClinicianNA16 (76)
      OphthalmologistNA5 (24)
      OncologistNA4 (19)
      Genetic counsellorNA3 (14)
      Child life specialistNA2 (10)
      Molecular geneticistNA1 (5)
      Social workerNA1 (5)
     Clinician-scientistNA3 (14)
      OphthalmologistNA2 (10)
      Medical geneticistNA1 (5)
     ResearcherNA2 (10)
    Laterality
     Bilateral26 (68)NA
     Unilateral11 (29)NA
     Not provided1 (3)NA
    Place of residence
     Ontario22 (58)12 (57)
     Alberta11 (29)2 (10)
     New Brunswick1 (3)0 (0)
     Quebec1 (3)3 (14)
     Nova Scotia0 (0)2 (10)
     Not provided3 (8)2 (10)
    • Note: NA = not applicable, SD = standard deviation.

    • ↵* Except where noted otherwise.

    • ↵† n = 20.

    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 3:

    Number of questions from online survey (phase 1) and number presented to the steering committee, by category

    CategoryQuestions from surveyQuestions removedNo. (%) of questions presented to steering committee
    No. (%)suggested by patientsNo. (%) suggested by nonpatientsOverall total
    CliniciansClinician-scientistsResearchersTotalOut of scopeAlready answered by researchDuplicate
    Awareness4 (3.5)0000 (0)4 (2.3)1003 (2.3)
    Diagnosis9 (7.9)4004 (7)13 (7.4)0049 (7.0)
    Family planning7 (6.1)1001 (2)8 (4.6)1205 (3.9)
    Follow-up9 (7.9)1102 (3)11 (6.3)00011 (8.5)
    Genetics and molecular31 (27.2)34714 (23)45 (25.7)63828 (21.7)
    Global health0 (0.0)2013 (5)3 (1.7)0003 (2.3)
    Psychosocial15 (13.2)110112 (20)27 (15.4)00324 (18.6)
    Second cancer22 (19.3)6107 (11)29 (16.6)01919 (14.7)
    Treatment6 (5.3)141015 (25)21 (12.0)30414 (10.8)
    Trilateral retinoblastoma2 (1.8)1001 (2)3 (1.7)0102 (1.6)
    Vision7 (6.1)0000 (0)7 (4.0)0007 (5.4)
    Miscellaneous2 (1.8)2002 (3)4 (2.3)0004 (3.1)
    Total114 (65.1)457961 (35)175 (100.0)11728129 (100.0)
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 4:

    Top 30 retinoblastoma research priorities

    Final rankCategoryQuestionAggregate ranking
    FirstSecond
    1DiagnosisHow to increase early diagnosis of retinoblastoma (i.e., decrease age or stage at diagnosis)?71
    2Second cancerWhat second cancer screening is optimal for heritable retinoblastoma survivors (including whole body magnetic resonance imaging)?11
    3PsychosocialHow to provide culturally competent social, emotional and psychological support to patients with retinoblastoma, survivors, parents and families (at diagnosis and beyond)?22
    4Follow-upWhat is the optimal follow-up (including ophthalmologic and oncologic) for patients with heritable retinoblastoma and survivors (by diagnosis and treatment), and how can we ensure this is provided to all?93
    5TreatmentProspective retinoblastoma treatment studies with long-term follow-up54
    6PsychosocialWhat is the effect of enucleation and vision loss on retinoblastoma survivors?115
    7Second cancerWhat are the risk factors for second cancers in heritable retinoblastoma survivors, and, in turn, what do heritable retinoblastoma survivors need to know about living well and minimizing risk of second cancers?76
    8MiscellaneousHow to improve collaboration across the different top centres caring for retinoblastoma: forming an international consortium, a unified registry and combined trials, instead of the current air of competition?1710
    9Follow-upHow to provide a detailed pathway of care or plan, outlining treatment and follow-up, to patients with retinoblastoma and families?138
    10Global healthHow can optimal retinoblastoma care be delivered in low-resource settings (including rural and remote communities)?49
    11TreatmentClinical trials of novel agents, targeted agents added to “backbone” chemotherapy or intra-arterial chemotherapy to improve eye-salvage rates39
    12Genetics and molecularWhat genetic mechanism results in second cancers in heritable retinoblastoma survivors?107
    13TreatmentBetter identification of who needs chemotherapy after high-risk pathologic findings1210
    14DiagnosisWhat new technology could be used to diagnose retinoblastoma earlier, including noninvasive in utero testing?611
    15AwarenessHow to increase family doctor/pediatrician awareness of retinoblastoma (i.e., signs and symptoms, and the importance of early diagnosis), and screening and diagnosis of retinoblastoma?612
    16PsychosocialHow can we help families cope better during diagnosis and critical stages (including enucleation)?813
    17Second cancerWhat are the risks of second cancers for mosaic RB1 mutation carriers (i.e., those in whom RB1 mutation is present in some but not all cells in their body)?1814
    18TreatmentHow to reduce side [adverse] effects from retinoblastoma treatments?1215
    19Genetics and molecularCan we identify the key molecular event that distinguishes retinoma (benign retinoblastoma precursor) from retinoblastoma?1616
    20Genetics and molecularCan a known RB1 gene mutation be corrected?1518
    21Follow-upHow to improve the sensitivity of minimal residual disease (i.e., metastasized cancer cells that cannot be detected by routine tests) diagnostics in retinoblastoma?2017
    22Genetics and molecularHow to communicate with and educate patients, survivors and parents about retinoblastoma genetics and their specific retinoblastoma genetic testing results (including new tools, techniques and innovations)?1619
    23Family planningWhat is the best way to support and educate heritable retinoblastoma survivors before they have their own children and to ensure their children have optimal perinatal care?1420
    24Genetics and molecularHow can second cancers be prevented in heritable retinoblastoma survivors?1321
    25Second cancerWhat is the second cancer incidence among heritable retinoblastoma survivors?1822
    26Genetics and molecularHow can we reduce the risk of second cancers in heritable retinoblastoma survivors?1922
    27PsychosocialWhat social, emotional and psychologic support services are available across Canada for patients with retinoblastoma, survivors and parents (i.e., comparisons nationally)?2123
    28PsychosocialWhat is the impact — on mental health, finances, employment, siblings and family life — when one must travel long distances for retinoblastoma care?2224
    29VisionHow can scar tissue/calcium in the eye from retinoblastoma treatment be removed to give better vision?2325
    30Genetics and molecularWhat causes heritable (germline) and nonheritable (somatic) retinoblastoma mutations?2426
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ Open: 8 (2)
Vol. 8, Issue 2
1 Apr 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The top 10 retinoblastoma research priorities in Canada as determined by patients, clinicians and researchers: a patient-oriented priority-setting partnership
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The top 10 retinoblastoma research priorities in Canada as determined by patients, clinicians and researchers: a patient-oriented priority-setting partnership
Kaitlyn Flegg, Maxwell J. Gelkopf, Sarah A. Johnson, Helen Dimaras
Apr 2020, 8 (2) E420-E428; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190221

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The top 10 retinoblastoma research priorities in Canada as determined by patients, clinicians and researchers: a patient-oriented priority-setting partnership
Kaitlyn Flegg, Maxwell J. Gelkopf, Sarah A. Johnson, Helen Dimaras
Apr 2020, 8 (2) E420-E428; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190221
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Clinical
    • Pediatrics
      • Children
      • Infants
    • Family Medicine, General Practice, Primary Care
      • Clinical research
      • Other family medicine
    • Patient-oriented research
  • Nonclinical
    • Patients
      • Patients' views
    • Health Policy
      • Wait Times

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Preparing manuscripts
  • Manuscript Submission Checklist
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Editorial Process
  • Patient-Oriented Research
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Manuscript Progress
  • Submitting a letter
  • Information for Reviewers

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panel
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Media
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

View CMA's Accessibility policy.

 

Powered by HighWire