Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission checklist
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Editorial process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Manuscript progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission checklist
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Editorial process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Manuscript progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CMAJ Open on Twitter
Research

Proportion of female recipients of resident-selected awards across Canada from 2000 to 2018: a retrospective observational study

Sarah Silverberg and Shannon M. Ruzycki
April 06, 2020 8 (2) E242-E250; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190129
Sarah Silverberg
Department of Pediatrics (Silverberg), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Division of General Internal Medicine (Ruzycki) and Department of Community Health Sciences (Ruzycki), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shannon M. Ruzycki
Department of Pediatrics (Silverberg), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Division of General Internal Medicine (Ruzycki) and Department of Community Health Sciences (Ruzycki), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1:

    Proportion of eligible full-time faculty physicians in Canada who won residency association awards, 2000–2018, by sex (Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada data).

  • Figure 2:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2:

    Proportion of eligible resident physicians in Canada who won residency association awards, 2002–2018, by sex.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 1:

    Number of awards distributed to staff and resident physicians by Canadian provincial and national residency associations, 2000–2018, by award category*

    Residency associationTotalProfessionalism, advocacy and wellness†Education and teaching†Not classified‡
    Staff recipients
     RDOC2512130
     RDBC3517180
     PARA6931380
     RDOS650650
     PARIM270234
     PARO794750
     Mar-Docs4040
     PAR-NL100100
     Total314642464
    Resident recipients
     RDOC191180
     RDBC131300
     RDOS101000
     PARIM5113
     PARO680680
     Mar-Docs5500
     PAR-NL9009
     Total129407712
    • Note: Mar-Docs = Maritime Resident Doctors, PARA = Professional Association of Resident Physicians of Alberta, PARIM = Professional Association of Residents and Interns of Manitoba, PAR-NL = Professional Association of Residents of Newfoundland and Labrador, PARO = Professional Association of Residents of Ontario, RDBC = Resident Doctors of British Columbia, RDOC = Resident Doctors of Canada, RDOS = Resident Doctors of Saskatchewan.

    • ↵* For a list of award names and criteria, see Appendix 2.

    • ↵† Assigned based on award name or nomination criteria, where available.

    • ↵‡ Included awards that were not classified as professionalism, advocacy and wellness, or education and teaching awards based on award name or nomination criteria, where available.

    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 2:

    Number of full-time faculty physicians who received an award from a Canadian residency association proportion, by sex, and odds of receiving an award*

    YearNo. of male award winners (% of total awards)Total no. of male faculty physicians (% of eligible physicians†)No. of female award winners (% of total awards)Total no. of female faculty physicians (% of eligible physicians†)OR (95% CI)
    2018‡20 (69.0)8514 (61.1)9 (31.0)5418 (38.9)1.41 (0.61–3.53)
    201713 (65.0)8304 (61.5)7 (35.0)5201 (38.5)1.16 (0.43–3.44)
    201614 (73.7)8189 (62.8)5 (26.3)4859 (37.2)1.66 (0.57–5.90)
    201520 (74.1)8102 (62.9)7 (25.9)4776 (37.1)1.68 (0.68–4.72)
    201417 (77.3)7960 (63.2)5 (22.7)4644 (36.8)1.98 (0.70–6.88)
    201314 (66.7)7346 (63.8)7 (33.3)4175 (36.2)1.14 (0.43–3.33)
    201216 (64.0)7212 (64.4)9 (36.0)3993 (35.6)0.98 (0.41–2.53)
    201114 (60.9)6940 (64.8)9 (39.1)3777 (35.2)0.85 (0.34–2.22)
    2010‡16 (84.2)6730 (64.1)3 (15.8)3776 (35.9)2.99 (0.86–16.03)
    2009‡11 (84.6)6520 (64.5)2 (15.4)3559 (35.5)3.00 (0.65–27.88)
    2008‡15 (78.9)6310 (65.4)4 (21.1)3342 (34.6)1.99 (0.63–8.23)
    2007‡11 (73.3)6100 (66.1)4 (26.7)3125 (33.9)1.41 (0.42–6.07)
    2006‡6 (100.0)5890 (66.9)0 (0.0)2908 (33.1)5.44 (0.30–98.35)
    2005‡10 (76.9)5680 (67.9)3 (23.1)2691 (32.1)1.58 (0.41–8.94)
    2004‡7 (70.0)5470 (68.9)3 (30.0)2474 (31.1)1.06 (0.24–6.33)
    2003‡9 (90.0)5260 (70.0)1 (10.0)2257 (30.0)3.86 (0.53–169.3)
    2002‡6 (54.5)5050 (71.2)5 (45.5)2040 (28.8)0.48 (0.12–2.01)
    2001‡7 (100.0)4840 (72.6)0 (0.0)1823 (27.4)8.68 (0.51–147.45)
    2000‡4 (80.0)4630 (74.2)1 (20.0)1606 (25.8)1.39 (0.14–68.36)
    Total‡230 (73.2)125 047 (65.3)84 (26.8)66 444 (34.7)1.45 (1.13–1.89)
    • Note: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio.

    • ↵* Odds of male physicians’ receiving an award divided by odds of female physicians’ receiving an award.

    • ↵† The number of eligible male and female physicians who received awards was estimated from Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada data.

    • ↵‡ Contains estimates where data were not available and the numbers of male and female faculty physicians were extrapolated.

    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 3:

    Recipients of awards stratified by recipient discipline

    DisciplineTotal no. (%) of awards distributedNo. (%) of female award recipientsNo. (%) of females in discipline*Median OR (95% PI†)
    Staff physician recipients
    Family medicine‡39 (12.4)15 (38.5)19 981 (45.9)1.50 (0.90–2.22)
    Laboratory medicine§5 (1.6)2 (40.0)746 (41.5)1.66 (0.81–2.75)
    Medical specialists¶138 (43.9)35 (25.4)11 645 (40.5)1.91 (1.44–2.59)
    Surgical specialists**40 (12.7)8 (20.0)3000 (29.3)1.75 (1.13–2.71)
    Unknown92 (29.3)24 (26.1)––
    Total314 (100.0)84 (26.8)35 372 (42.0)1.95 (1.54–2.46)
    Resident physician recipients
    Family medicine‡13 (10.1)3 (23.1)2137 (60.8)1.90 (1.07–5.03)
    Laboratory medicine§0 (0.0)0 (0.0)208 (53.9)–
    Medical specialists¶65 (50.4)29 (44.6)3926 (51.7)1.44 (0.97–2.08)
    Surgical specialists**32 (24.8)10 (31.2)1226 (46.9)1.35 (0.75–2.15)
    Other††0 (0.0)0 (0.0)5 (0.1)–
    Unknown19 (14.7)10 (52.6)––
    Total129 (100.0)52 (40.3)7502 (53.1)1.54 (1.14–2.18)
    • Note: OR = odds ratio, PI = posterior interval.

    • ↵* In 2018, based on data on discipline and sex from the Canadian Medical Association for staff physician recipients and data from the Canadian Post-M.D. Education Registry (CAPER) for resident physicians.

    • ↵† 95% posterior intervals obtained from Bayesian modelling do not describe statistical significance but, rather, the uncertainty range compatible with 95% of subjects.

    • ↵‡ Includes family medicine and the Enhanced Skills training programs (e.g., family medicine plus emergency medicine), based on the CAPER classifications.

    • ↵§ Includes anatomic pathology, general pathology, hematologic pathology, medical biochemistry, medical microbiology and neuropathology, based on the CAPER classifications.

    • ↵¶ Includes anesthesiology, dermatology, diagnostic radiology, emergency medicine, internal medicine (including all subspecialties of internal medicine), medical genetics and genomics, neurology, neurology – pediatric, nuclear medicine, palliative medicine, pediatrics (including all subspecialties of pediatrics), physical medicine and rehabilitation, psychiatry, public health and preventive medicine, and radiation oncology, based on the CAPER classifications.

    • ↵** Includes cardiac surgery, general surgery, neurosurgery, obstetrics and gynecology, ophthalmology, otolaryngology, orthopedic surgery, plastic surgery, urology and vascular surgery, based on the CAPER classifications.

    • ↵†† Includes cytopathology, transfusion medicine, adult interventional cardiology and adult echocardiography, based on the CAPER classifications.

    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 4:

    Number of resident physicians who received an award from a Canadian residency association, by sex, and odds of receiving an award*

    YearNo. of male resident award winners (% of total awards)No. of male residents (% of eligible resident physicians)No. of female resident award winners (% of total awards)No. of female residents (% of eligible resident physicians)OR (95% CI)
    2018†11 (68.8)6626 (46.9)5 (31.3)7502 (53.1)2.49 (0.80–9.15)
    2017†8 (50.0)6596 (47.0)8 (50.0)7449 (53.0)1.13 (0.37–3.45)
    2016†7 (58.3)6525 (46.6)5 (41.7)7474 (53.4)1.60 (0.44–6.41)
    2015†5 (41.7)6292 (46.0)7 (58.3)7393 (54.0)0.84 (0.21–3.07)
    2014†2 (25.0)6065 (45.3)6 (75.0)7314 (54.7)0.40 (0.04–2.25)
    2013†4 (44.4)5917 (45.7)5 (55.6)7034 (54.3)0.95 (0.19–4.42)
    2012†5 (62.5)5682 (45.6)3 (37.5)6785 (54.4)1.99 (0.39–12.82)
    2011‡6 (100.0)2076 (48.8)0 (0.0)2180 (51.2)8.43 (1.13–374.14)
    2010†4 (57.1)5136 (46.3)3 (42.9)5945 (53.7)1.54 (0.26–10.54)
    2009§4 (66.7)1593 (48.2)2 (33.3)1713 (51.8)2.15 (0.31–23.80)
    2008§3 (75.0)1484 (48.2)1 (25.0)1594 (51.8)3.22 (0.26–169.24)
    2007¶4 (100.0)1005 (59.8)0 (0.0)998 (40.2)8.97 (0.48–166.89)
    2006¶3 (60.0)958 (50.6)2 (40.0)934 (49.4)1.46 (0.17–17.54)
    2005§3 (60.0)1289 (51.7)2 (40.0)1203 (48.3)1.40 (0.16–16.78)
    2004¶3 (60.0)947 (54.9)2 (40.0)778 (45.1)1.23 (0.14–14.79)
    2003¶3 (75.0)926 (55.3)1 (25.0)747 (44.7)2.42 (0.19–127.20)
    2002**2 (100.0)227 (64.3)0 (0.0)126 (35.7)2.80 (0.13–58.88)
    Total77 (59.7)59 344 (46.9)52 (40.3)67 169 (53.1)1.70 (1.18–2.46)
    • Note: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio.

    • ↵* Odds of male physicians’ receiving an award divided by odds of female physicians’ receiving an award.

    • ↵† All residents included.

    • ↵‡ Includes residents from Western University, the University of Toronto, the University of British Columbia and the University of Manitoba.

    • ↵§ Includes residents from Western University, the University of Toronto and the University of British Columbia.

    • ↵¶ Includes residents from Western University and the University of Toronto.

    • ↵** Includes Western University data.

    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 5:

    Number of staff and resident physician recipients of professionalism, advocacy and wellness awards, and education and teaching awards

    PhysicianProfessionalism, advocacy and wellness awardsEducation and teaching awardsOR (95% CI)
    Total awards distributedNo. (%) of female award recipientsTotal awards distributedNo. (%) of female award recipients
    Staff6430 (46.9)24653 (21.5)3.21 (1.72–5.95)
    Residents4020 (50.0)7726 (33.8)1.96 (0.84–4.60)
    • Note: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ Open: 8 (2)
Vol. 8, Issue 2
1 Apr 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Proportion of female recipients of resident-selected awards across Canada from 2000 to 2018: a retrospective observational study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Proportion of female recipients of resident-selected awards across Canada from 2000 to 2018: a retrospective observational study
Sarah Silverberg, Shannon M. Ruzycki
Apr 2020, 8 (2) E242-E250; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190129

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Proportion of female recipients of resident-selected awards across Canada from 2000 to 2018: a retrospective observational study
Sarah Silverberg, Shannon M. Ruzycki
Apr 2020, 8 (2) E242-E250; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190129
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Preparing manuscripts
  • Manuscript Submission Checklist
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Editorial Process
  • Patient-Oriented Research
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Manuscript Progress
  • Submitting a letter
  • Information for Reviewers

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panel
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Media
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

 

Powered by HighWire