Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for Authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission Checklist
    • Publication Fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial Policies
    • Editorial Process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Manuscript Progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for Authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission Checklist
    • Publication Fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial Policies
    • Editorial Process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Manuscript Progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CMAJ Open on Twitter
Research

The association between payment model and specialist physicians’ selection of patients with diabetes: a descriptive study

Amity E. Quinn, Alun Edwards, Peter Senior, Kerry A. McBrien, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Marcello Tonelli, Flora Au, Zhihai Ma, Robert G. Weaver and Braden J. Manns
February 18, 2019 7 (1) E109-E116; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20180171
Amity E. Quinn
Departments of Community Health Sciences (Quinn, McBrien, Hemmelgarn, Manns), Medicine (Edwards, Hemmelgarn, Tonelli, Au, Ma, Weaver, Manns) and Family Medicine (McBrien), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Senior), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alun Edwards
Departments of Community Health Sciences (Quinn, McBrien, Hemmelgarn, Manns), Medicine (Edwards, Hemmelgarn, Tonelli, Au, Ma, Weaver, Manns) and Family Medicine (McBrien), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Senior), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Senior
Departments of Community Health Sciences (Quinn, McBrien, Hemmelgarn, Manns), Medicine (Edwards, Hemmelgarn, Tonelli, Au, Ma, Weaver, Manns) and Family Medicine (McBrien), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Senior), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kerry A. McBrien
Departments of Community Health Sciences (Quinn, McBrien, Hemmelgarn, Manns), Medicine (Edwards, Hemmelgarn, Tonelli, Au, Ma, Weaver, Manns) and Family Medicine (McBrien), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Senior), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brenda R. Hemmelgarn
Departments of Community Health Sciences (Quinn, McBrien, Hemmelgarn, Manns), Medicine (Edwards, Hemmelgarn, Tonelli, Au, Ma, Weaver, Manns) and Family Medicine (McBrien), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Senior), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcello Tonelli
Departments of Community Health Sciences (Quinn, McBrien, Hemmelgarn, Manns), Medicine (Edwards, Hemmelgarn, Tonelli, Au, Ma, Weaver, Manns) and Family Medicine (McBrien), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Senior), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Flora Au
Departments of Community Health Sciences (Quinn, McBrien, Hemmelgarn, Manns), Medicine (Edwards, Hemmelgarn, Tonelli, Au, Ma, Weaver, Manns) and Family Medicine (McBrien), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Senior), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhihai Ma
Departments of Community Health Sciences (Quinn, McBrien, Hemmelgarn, Manns), Medicine (Edwards, Hemmelgarn, Tonelli, Au, Ma, Weaver, Manns) and Family Medicine (McBrien), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Senior), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert G. Weaver
Departments of Community Health Sciences (Quinn, McBrien, Hemmelgarn, Manns), Medicine (Edwards, Hemmelgarn, Tonelli, Au, Ma, Weaver, Manns) and Family Medicine (McBrien), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Senior), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Braden J. Manns
Departments of Community Health Sciences (Quinn, McBrien, Hemmelgarn, Manns), Medicine (Edwards, Hemmelgarn, Tonelli, Au, Ma, Weaver, Manns) and Family Medicine (McBrien), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Senior), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Definitions of visit types to diabetes specialists with a clear indication*

    DescriptionDefinitionWhy the referral was clearly indicated
    Poorly controlled HbA1CHbA1C ≥ 8.5%. The HbA1C test reflects the percentage of hemoglobin (protein in red blood cells) coated in sugar. Higher HbA1C values indicate poorer blood glucose control and higher risk of complications.Diabetes control is sufficiently poor that improvement is unlikely without substantial changes to therapy, which often requires a diabetes specialist and multidisciplinary team.
    Elevated HbA1C and taking 3 or more non-insulin antihyperglycemic agentsHbA1C ≥ 7.5% and taking 3 or more antihyperglycemic agentsPatients who fit this description have type 2 diabetes and need to start insulin. Traditionally, initiation of insulin in type 2 diabetes has been an activity for specialists. While this can be done safely and effectively in primary care it is not yet standard of care in all places.
    Elevated HbA1C and on insulin Hospital admission or ED visit for a diabetes-specific ambulatory care sensitive condition in prior yearHbA1C ≥ 7.5% and taking insulin (regardless of use of antihyperglycemic agents) A hospital admission or ED visit with 1 of the following ICD-10 codes indicating hyperglycemic or hypoglycemic events for type 1, type 2 and other diabetes in the year before specialist visit:
    • E10.0 (type 1 with coma)

    • E10.63 (type 1 with hypoglycemia)

    • E11.0 (type 2 with coma)

    • E11.63 (type 2 with hypoglycemia)

    • E13.0 (other specified with coma)

    • E13.63 (other specified with hypoglycemia)

    • E14.0 (unspecified with coma)

    • E14.63 (unspecified with hypoglycemia)

    Patients who fit this description have type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes requiring further intensification of therapy. These represent potentially life-threatening events because of significant gaps in, or adverse effects of, diabetes therapy that may require substantial changes to therapy by a specialist and multidisciplinary team.
    • Note: ED = emergency department, HbAIC = hemoglobin A1C, ICD-10 = International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision.

    • ↵* Definitions supported by the Canadian Diabetes Association’s 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Diabetes in Canada21 and expert committee opinion.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Characteristics of patients with diabetes with a specialist physician visit for diabetes, by physician payment model

    CharacteristicTotal
    n = 23 954
    Fee for service
    n = 21 218
    Salary based
    n = 2736
    Standardized difference
    Age, yr, mean ± SD56.3 ± 15.456.9 ± 14.852.3 ± 18.527.2
     18–29 yr, no. (%)1495 (6.2)1076 (5.1)419 (15.3)
     > 29 yr, no. (%)22 459 (93.8)20 142 (94.9)2317 (84.7)
    Female, no. (%)10 878 (45.4)9430 (44.4)1448 (52.9)17.0
    First Nations status, no. (%)886 (3.7)691 (3.3)195 (7.1)17.5
    Socioeconomic status, no. (%)
     Quintile 1 (lowest)5614 (24.1)5030 (24.3)584 (22.5)5.7
     Quintile 25563 (23.8)4982 (24.0)581 (22.4)5.4
     Quintile 34365 (18.7)3883 (18.7)482 (18.6)1.8
     Quintile 44041 (17.3)3568 (17.2)473 (18.2)1.3
     Quintile 5 (highest)3748 (16.1)3274 (15.8)474 (18.3)5.1
    Rural (community < 1000 people), no. (%)1764 (7.4)1425 (6.7)339 (12.4)19.4
    Primary care attachment (relational continuity),* no. (%)
     Infrequent2651 (11.1)2279 (10.7)372 (13.6)8.7
     Low3185 (13.3)2799 (13.2)386 (14.1)2.7
     Medium7021 (29.3)6211 (29.3)810 (29.6)0.7
     High11 097 (46.3)9929 (46.8)1168 (42.7)8.3
    Diabetes illness severity
     Baseline HbA1c, mean ± SD8.4 ± 2.08.4 ± 1.98.5 ± 2.17.6
     Proportion with sustained HbA1c > 9%, no. (%)5413 (22.6)4744 (22.4)669 (24.5)4.9
     Duration of diabetes, yr, mean ± SD8.9 ± 6.18.9 ± 6.09.1 ± 6.22.4
     Admissions to hospital or visits to EDs for diabetes-specific ACSC in year before visit,† mean ± SD0.35 ± 0.970.32 ± 0.860.53 ± 1.513.2
     Patients with 1 hospital or ED visit for diabetes-specific ACSC in year before visit,† no. (%)3888 (16.2)3354 (15.8)534 (19.5)5.8
     Patients with 2 or more hospital or ED visits for diabetes-specific ACSC in year before visit,† no. (%)1452 (6.1)1167 (5.5)285 (10.4)5.8
    Comorbidities
     CKD, no. (%)8993 (37.5)7897 (37.2)1096 (40.1)5.8
     More advanced CKD,‡ no. (%)1345 (15.0)1158 (14.7)187 (17.1)6.6
     1 comorbidity only (including diabetes),§ no. (%)3848 (16.1)3343 (15.8)505 (18.5)13.2
     2 comorbidities,§ no. (%)6063 (25.3)5474 (25.8)589 (21.5)10.1
     3 or 4 comorbidities,§ no. (%)9572 (40.0)8558 (40.3)1014 (37.1)6.7
     ≥ 5 or more comorbidities,§ no. (%)4471 (18.7)3843 (18.1)628 (23.0)12.0
    • Note: ACSC = ambulatory care sensitive condition, CKD = chronic kidney disease, ED = emergency department, SD = standard deviation.

    • ↵* Primary care attachment (also called relational continuity) categories are defined as infrequent (1 or 2 primary care visits), high (> 75% of patients’ 3 or more primary care visits made to the same physician), medium (50%–75% of 3 or more visits made to the same physician), and low (< 50% of visits made to any 1 primary care physician).

    • ↵† Diabetes-specific ambulatory care sensitive conditions include coma, acidosis and hypoglycemia and no mention of complications for type 1, type 2, other specified and unspecified diabetes.

    • ↵‡ More advanced CKD is defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 with moderate or severe albuminuria, or eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 with severe albuminuria. Moderate albuminuria is defined as albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) 30–300 mg/g, protein-creatinine ratio (PCR) 150–500 mg/g, urine dipstick (UDIP) 1+ and severe albuminuria is defined as ACR > 300 mg/g, PCR > 500 mg/g, UDIP ≥ 2+.

    • ↵§ Comorbidities included diabetes, CKD and 28 other chronic conditions with validated administrative data algorithms.20

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Characteristics of specialist physicians seeing patients with diabetes, by physician payment model

    CharacteristicFee for service
    n = 193
    Salary based
    n = 109
    Physician type*
     Diabetes specialist, no. (%)12 (6.2)11 (10.1)
     Internal medicine specialist, no. (%)165 (85.5)79 (72.5)
     Kidney specialist, no. (%)16 (8.3)19 (17.4)
    Years practising in Alberta since 1994, mean ± SD7.5 ± 7.08.7 ± 5.6
    Clinical workload†
     Lowest tertile, no. (%)46 (23.8)26 (23.9)
     Mid tertile, no. (%)79 (40.9)79 (72.5)
     Highest tertile, no. (%)68 (35.2)4 (3.7)
    Location‡
     Urban zone 1, no. (%)119 (61.7)49 (45.0)
     Urban zone 2, no. (%)74 (38.3)60 (55.1)
    Clinic location
     Teaching hospital, no. (%)21 (11)60 (55)
     Large urban hospital, no. (%)64 (33)20 (18)
     Suburban/rural hospital, no. (%)10 (5)0 (0)
     Community ambulatory centre, no. (%)31 (16)16 (15)
     Missing,§ no. (%)67 (34)13 (12)
    • Note: SD = standard deviation.

    • ↵* Diabetes specialists are endocrinologists and internal medicine physicians who see > 50 patients with diabetes each year and for whom > 30% of claims are for outpatient diabetes care.

    • ↵† Clinical workload is defined as the following: tertile 1 = fewer than 94 days billing per year, tertile 2 = 95–221 days billing per year, tertile 3 = 222–365 days billing per year.

    • ↵‡ The province of Alberta has 2 large urban areas: the cities of Calgary and Edmonton.

    • ↵§ Includes patient home visits and missing clinic locations.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Proportion of patients with a clearly indicated visit to a diabetes specialist, by age of patient and physician payment model

    CharacteristicTotal, no. (%)
    n = 11 130
    Fee for service, % (95% CI)
    n = 9988
    Salary based, % (95% CI)
    n = 1142
    Comparison of patients seen by salary-based physicians with patients seen by fee-for-service physicians, risk ratio (95% CI)p value
    All patients
     Visit with a clear indication to a diabetes specialist*6297 (56.6)55.6 (54.1–57.1)65.2 (60.7–70.1)1.17 (1.1–1.3)< 0.001
     Poorly controlled HbA1C†4442 (39.9)38.8 (37.6–40.0)49.9 (46.0–54.2)1.29 (1.2–1.4)< 0.001
     Elevated HbA1C and on 3 or more diabetes medications‡970 (8.7)9.2 (8.6–9.8)4.5 (3.4–5.9)0.49 (0.4–0.6)< 0.001
     Elevated HbA1C and on insulin§4058 (36.5)35.1 (34.0–36.3)48.4 (44.6–52.6)1.38 (1.3–1.5)< 0.001
     Hospital or ED visits for a diabetes-specific ACSC in the year before the specialist visit¶162 (1.5)1.3 (1.1–1.5)3.2 (2.3–4.4)2.50 (1.7–3.6)< 0.001
    Age 18–29 yrn = 906n = 610n = 296
     Visit with a clear indication to a diabetes specialist*560 (61.8)61.0 (55.1–67.5)63.5 (55.1–73.3)1.04 (0.9–1.2)0.7
     Poorly controlled HbA1C†439 (48.5)47.7 (42.5–53.5)50.0 (42.6–58.7)1.05 (0.9–1.3)0.6
     Elevated HbA1C and on 3 or more diabetes medications‡3 (0.3)0.33 (0.1–1.3)0.34 (0.1–2.4)1.03 (0.1–11.4)1.0
     Elevated HbA1C and on insulin§455 (50.2)47.9 (42.7–53.7)55.1 (47.2–64.2)1.15 (1.0–1.4)0.2
     Hospital or ED visits for a diabetes-specific ACSC in the year before the specialist visit¶22 (2.4)2.5 (1.5–4.1)2.4 (1.1–5.0)0.96 (0.4–2.4)0.9
    Age > 29 yrn = 10 224n = 9378n = 846
     Visit with a clear indication to a diabetes specialist*5737 (56.1)55.2 (53.8–56.8)65.8 (60.6–71.5)1.19 (1.1–1.3)< 0.001
     Poorly controlled HbA1C†4003 (39.2)38.2 (37.0–39.5)49.9 (45.3–54.9)1.31 (1.2–1.5)< 0.001
     Elevated HbA1C and on 3 or more diabetes medications‡967 (9.5)9.8 (9.2–10.4)5.9 (4.5–7.8)0.60 (0.5–0.8)< 0.001
     Elevated HbA1C and on insulin§3603 (35.2)34.3 (33.1–35.5)46.1 (41.7–50.9)1.35 (1.2–1.5)< 0.001
     Hospital or ED visits for a diabetes-specific ACSC in the year before the specialist visit¶140 (1.4)1.18 (0.98–1.4)3.4 (2.4–4.9)2.90 (1.9–4.4)< 0.001
    • Note: ACSC = ambulatory care sensitive condition, CI = confidence interval, ED = emergency department.

    • ↵* Diabetes specialists were defined as those seeing > 50 patients with diabetes each year and for whom > 30% of claims were for outpatient diabetes treatment.

    • ↵† HbA1c > 8.5.

    • ↵‡ HbA1c > 7.5 and taking 3 or more non-insulin antihyperglycemic agents.

    • ↵§ HbA1c > 7.5 and on insulin.

    • ↵¶ Hypoglycemic- or hyperglycemic-related incidents (ICD-10 [International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision] codes E10.0 [type 1 with coma], E10.63 [type 1 with hypoglycemia], E11.0 [type 2 with coma], E11.63 [type 2 with hypoglycemia], E13.0 [other specified with coma], E13.63 [other specified with hypoglycemia], E14.0 [unspecified with coma] and E14.63 [unspecified with hypoglycemia]).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ Open: 7 (1)
Vol. 7, Issue 1
1 Jan 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The association between payment model and specialist physicians’ selection of patients with diabetes: a descriptive study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The association between payment model and specialist physicians’ selection of patients with diabetes: a descriptive study
Amity E. Quinn, Alun Edwards, Peter Senior, Kerry A. McBrien, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Marcello Tonelli, Flora Au, Zhihai Ma, Robert G. Weaver, Braden J. Manns
Jan 2019, 7 (1) E109-E116; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20180171

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The association between payment model and specialist physicians’ selection of patients with diabetes: a descriptive study
Amity E. Quinn, Alun Edwards, Peter Senior, Kerry A. McBrien, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Marcello Tonelli, Flora Au, Zhihai Ma, Robert G. Weaver, Braden J. Manns
Jan 2019, 7 (1) E109-E116; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20180171
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Primary care physicians perceptions of the role of alternative payment models in recruitment and retention in rural Alberta: a qualitative study
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Clinical
    • Endocrinology & Metabolism
      • Diabetes
    • Health services research
  • Nonclinical
    • Health Policy
      • Organization of health care

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Preparing manuscripts
  • Manuscript Submission Checklist
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Editorial Process
  • Patient-Oriented Research
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Manuscript Progress
  • Submitting a letter
  • Information for Reviewers

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panel
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Media
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

View CMA's Accessibility policy.

 

Powered by HighWire