Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for Authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission Checklist
    • Publication Fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial Policies
    • Editorial Process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Manuscript Progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for Authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission Checklist
    • Publication Fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial Policies
    • Editorial Process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Manuscript Progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CMAJ Open on Twitter
Research

Canadian federal penitentiaries as obesogenic environments: a retrospective cohort study

Claire Johnson, Jean-Philippe Chaput, Maikol Diasparra, Catherine Richard and Lise Dubois
August 28, 2018 6 (3) E347-E352; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20180044
Claire Johnson
Interdisciplinary School of Health (Johnson), University of Ottawa; Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group (Chaput); Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute; School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Diasparra, Richard, Dubois), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Philippe Chaput
Interdisciplinary School of Health (Johnson), University of Ottawa; Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group (Chaput); Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute; School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Diasparra, Richard, Dubois), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maikol Diasparra
Interdisciplinary School of Health (Johnson), University of Ottawa; Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group (Chaput); Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute; School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Diasparra, Richard, Dubois), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Richard
Interdisciplinary School of Health (Johnson), University of Ottawa; Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group (Chaput); Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute; School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Diasparra, Richard, Dubois), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lise Dubois
Interdisciplinary School of Health (Johnson), University of Ottawa; Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group (Chaput); Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute; School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Diasparra, Richard, Dubois), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Sociodemographic factors for all participants

    FactorNo. (%)
    n = 1420
    Sex
    Male1276 (89.9)
    Female144 (10.1)
    Age, yr
    18 to ≤ 24104 (7.3)
    ≥ 25 to ≤ 34389 (27.4)
    ≥ 35 to ≤ 44315 (22.2)
    ≥ 45 to ≤ 64504 (35.5)
    ≥ 65108 (7.6)
    Region
    Atlantic520 (36.6)
    Ontario900 (63.4)
    First language
    English1265 (89.1)
    French155 (10.9)
    Ethnicity
    White904 (63.7)
    Black203 (14.3)
    Aboriginal214 (15.1)
    Other99 (7.0)
    Feeding system
    Tray (menu)393 (27.7)
    Cafeteria (menu)522 (36.8)
    Kitchenette (no menu)505 (35.6)
    Security level
    Maximum348 (24.5)
    Medium781 (55.0)
    Minimum291 (20.5)
    Length of incarceration at follow-up
    ≤ 18 mo553 (38.9)
    > 18 mo to ≤ 5 yr458 (32.3)
    > 5 yr409 (28.8)
    Length of sentence, yr
    2 to ≤ 3285 (20.1)
    > 3 to ≤ 5286 (20.1)
    > 5 to ≤ 25365 (25.7)
    > 25484 (34.1)
    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Categories of body mass index for Canadian inmates on admission and at follow-up

    CategoryBMI rangeAdmission, no. (%)
    n = 1420
    Follow-up, no. (%)
    n = 1420
    p value
    Underweight< 18.517 (1.2)F< 0.0001*
    Normal18.5–24.9466 (32.8)222 (15.6)
    Overweight25.0–29.9559 (39.4)551 (38.8)
    Obese≥ 30.0378 (26.6)645 (45.4)
    Overweight and obese≥ 25937 (66.0)1196 (84.2)
    Obesity class I30.0–34.9236 (16.6)405 (28.5)
    Obesity class II35.0–39.992 (6.5)146 (10.3)
    Extreme obesity class III≥ 40.050 (3.5)94 (6.6)
    • Note: BMI = body mass index, F = proportion too low to report and could threaten confidentiality.

    • ↵* χ2 test; p < 0.05 considered significant.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Median change in weight and body mass index, and annual rate of change, between admission and follow-up by sociodemographic characteristic

    CharacteristicMedian weight change, kg (95% CI)p value*Median BMI change (95% CI)p value*Median annual rate of change, kg/yr (95% CI)p value*
    Overall+6.20 (5.55–6.85)+2.00 (1.79–2.21)+1.52 (1.24–1.81)
    Sex
     Male+6.50 (5.82–7.18)0.3+2.00 (1.78–2.22)0.7+1.46 (1.18–1.75)0.2
     Female+5.80 (3.60–8.00)+2.00 (1.19–2.81)+2.69 (0.99–4.39)
    Age, yr
     18 to ≤ 24+4.70 (2.99–6.41)0.05+1.60 (1.04–2.16)0.04+3.51 (2.08–4.93)< 0.0001
     ≥ 25 to ≤ 34+5.70 (4.62–6.78)+1.80 (1.45–2.15)+2.30 (1.63–2.98)
     ≥ 35 to ≤ 44+6.30 (4.99–7.70)+2.00 (1.55–2.45)+2.13 (1.35–2.92)
     ≥ 45 to ≤ 64+7.60 (6.35–8.85)+2.50 (2.09–2.91)+1.03 (0.68–1.39)
     ≥ 65+5.30 (3.87–9.46)+1.75 (1.28–3.10)+0.51 (0.16–0.85)
    Region
     Atlantic+5.05 (4.00–6.10)0.0004+1.70 (1.35–2.05)0.002+1.42 (0.91–1.92)0.1
     Ontario+7.10 (6.28–7.92)+2.30 (2.04–2.56)+1.57 (1.22–1.92)
    First language
     English+6.30 (5.61–6.99)0.3+2.00 (1.78–2.22)0.4+1.50 (1.20–1.80)0.9
     French+6.00 (4.08–7.92)+1.90 (1.28–2.52)+1.75 (0.78–2.72)
    Ethnicity
     White+6.30 (5.47–7.13)0.004+2.00 (1.73–2.27)0.005+1.42 (1.07–1.78)0.06
     Black+7.00 (5.54–8.46)+2.20 (1.75–2.65)+2.06 (1.22–2.90)
     Aboriginal+7.70 (6.92–10.52)+2.40 (1.83–2.97)+1.72 (0.89–2.54)
     Other+3.30 (1.61–4.99)+1.00 (0.77–1.86)+1.14 (0.49–1.78)
    • Note: BMI = body mass index, CI = confidence interval.

    • ↵* Wilcoxon test was used in analyses with two categories (sex, region, language), a Kruskal–Wallis test was used in analyses with three or more categories (age and ethnicity); p < 0.05 was considered significant.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Median change in weight and body mass index, and annual rate of change, between admission and follow-up by institutional characteristic

    CharacteristicMedian weight change in kg (95% CI)p value*Median BMI change (95% CI)p value*Median annual weight change in kg/yr (95% CI)p value*
    Overall+6.20 (5.55–6.85)+2.00 (1.79–2.21)+1.52 (1.24–1.81)
    Feeding system
     Tray (menu)+6.00 (4.83–7.17)0.97+1.90 (1.52–2.28)0.97+1.48 (0.98–1.97)0.97
     Cafeteria (menu)+6.85 (5.75–7.95)+2.20 (1.86–2.54)+1.63 (1.18–2.08)
     Kitchenette (no menu)+6.50 (5.41–7.59)+2.10 (1.74–2.46)+1.50 (0.93–2.07)
    Security level
     Maximum+5.55 (4.32–6.78)0.05+1.80 (1.42–2.18)0.04+1.45 (0.94–1.95)0.1
     Medium+7.00 (6.10–7.90)+2.30 (2.01–2.59)+1.79 (1.39–2.19)
     Minimum+5.55 (4.07–6.93)+1.80 (1.34–2.26)+1.02 (0.24–1.81)
    Length of incarceration at follow-up
     ≤ 18 mo+5.60 (4.70–6.50)0.001+1.90 (1.60–2.20)0.001+6.40 (5.33–7.47)< 0.001
     > 18 mo to ≤ 5 yr+5.75 (4.65–6.85)+1.80 (1.45–2.15)+2.09 (1.67–2.51)
     > 5 yr+8.40 (6.92–9.88)+2.70 (2.23–3.17)+0.64 (0.54–0.74)
    Length of total sentence, yr
     2 to ≤ 3+6.00 (4.63–7.37)0.006+2.00 (1.55–2.45)0.007+6.21 (4.76–7.66)< 0.001
     > 3 to ≤ 5+6.25 (4.99–7.51)+2.00 (1.60–2.40)+3.74 (2.78–4.70)
     > 5 to ≤ 25+5.50 (4.35–6.65)+1.70 (1.33–2.07)+1.95 (1.44–2.46)
     > 25+7.70 (6.36–9.04)+2.50 (2.06–2.94)+0.69 (0.56–0.81)
    • Note: BMI = body mass index, CI = confidence interval.

    • ↵* Kruskal–Wallis test; p < 0.05 was considered significant. The mean (± standard deviation) length of time between admission and follow-up was 5.0 (± 8.3) years.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ Open: 6 (3)
Vol. 6, Issue 3
1 Jul 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Canadian federal penitentiaries as obesogenic environments: a retrospective cohort study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Canadian federal penitentiaries as obesogenic environments: a retrospective cohort study
Claire Johnson, Jean-Philippe Chaput, Maikol Diasparra, Catherine Richard, Lise Dubois
Jul 2018, 6 (3) E347-E352; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20180044

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Canadian federal penitentiaries as obesogenic environments: a retrospective cohort study
Claire Johnson, Jean-Philippe Chaput, Maikol Diasparra, Catherine Richard, Lise Dubois
Jul 2018, 6 (3) E347-E352; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20180044
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Impact of incarceration on cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review and meta-regression on weight and BMI change
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Preparing manuscripts
  • Manuscript Submission Checklist
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Editorial Process
  • Patient-Oriented Research
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Manuscript Progress
  • Submitting a letter
  • Information for Reviewers

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panel
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Media
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

View CMA's Accessibility policy.

 

Powered by HighWire