Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for Authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission Checklist
    • Publication Fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial Policies
    • Editorial Process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Manuscript Progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ Open
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ Open

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for Authors
    • Preparing manuscripts
    • Submission Checklist
    • Publication Fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial Policies
    • Editorial Process
    • Patient-Oriented Research
    • Manuscript Progress
    • Submitting a letter
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CMAJ Open on Twitter
Research

Cost-effectiveness of palivizumab compared to no prophylaxis in term infants residing in the Canadian Arctic

Anna Banerji, Kaspar Ng, Theo J. Moraes, Vladimir Panzov, Joan Robinson and Bonita E. Lee
October 18, 2016 4 (4) E623-E633; DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20150052
Anna Banerji
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Banerji), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Banerji), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Pediatrics (Ng), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Hospital for Sick Children (Moraes); Applied Health Research Centre (Panzov), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Robinson) and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Faculty of Medicine, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kaspar Ng
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Banerji), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Banerji), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Pediatrics (Ng), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Hospital for Sick Children (Moraes); Applied Health Research Centre (Panzov), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Robinson) and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Faculty of Medicine, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theo J. Moraes
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Banerji), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Banerji), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Pediatrics (Ng), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Hospital for Sick Children (Moraes); Applied Health Research Centre (Panzov), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Robinson) and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Faculty of Medicine, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vladimir Panzov
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Banerji), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Banerji), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Pediatrics (Ng), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Hospital for Sick Children (Moraes); Applied Health Research Centre (Panzov), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Robinson) and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Faculty of Medicine, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joan Robinson
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Banerji), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Banerji), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Pediatrics (Ng), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Hospital for Sick Children (Moraes); Applied Health Research Centre (Panzov), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Robinson) and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Faculty of Medicine, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bonita E. Lee
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Banerji), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Banerji), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Pediatrics (Ng), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Hospital for Sick Children (Moraes); Applied Health Research Centre (Panzov), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Robinson) and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Faculty of Medicine, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for scenario A, palivizumab prophylaxis for healthy term infants across the Canadian Arctic compared with no prophylaxis for infants less than 6 months of age at or during the 2009 respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) season (Jan. 1-June 30). †Prophylaxis up to 5 months of age provides 6 months of protection. ‡Scenario C, sensitivity analysis using 78% risk reduction.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for scenario B, palivizumab prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis for healthy term infants across the Canadian Arctic up to 5 months of age. *Population at risk is fluid, with equal number meeting inclusion criteria (through birth) as exclusion criteria. †Estimated risk reduction 96%. ‡Prophylaxis up to 5 months of age provides 6 months of protection. RSV = respiratory syncytial virus.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1 Variables for cost-effectiveness analysis of palivizumab prophylaxis in term Inuit infants admitted to hospital with infection due to RSV between Jan. 1 and June 30, 2009
    VariableEstimateRange or alternative estimateComments
    Rate of RSV-related admissionActual data for 2009: number of admissions of healthy term infants*/population at risk in each region, January to June 2009Minimum estimate2009 had the lowest rates of RSV-related admissions documented in the previous 30 years.2-7 As other years are likely to have equal or greater rates of RSV infection, cost-effectiveness would be similar or greater. May be underestimate as only 90% were tested for RSV.
    Births in 2009Actual number of births-Source: Statistics Canada or territorial governments
    Healthy term infants0.92 of births in 2009-Source: Dr. Maureen Baikie, Chief Medical Officer of Health, Government of Nunavut. In 2011-2013, 9.3% of the population received palivizumab each year (estimate 8% of those aged < 6 mo, 1.3% of those aged 6 mo-2 yr).
    Population at risk51/72 of healthy infants-Infants born July 1, 2008, to May 31, 2009
    Population that received prophylaxis scenario A51/72 of healthy infants-Prophylactic administration of palivizumab to all infants born July 1, 2008, to May 31, 2009 (see Table 3)
    Population that received prophylaxis scenario B6/12 of healthy infants-Prophylactic administration of palivizumab to infants < 5 mo of age (for 6 mo of protection) during RSV season (see Table 3)
    Costs for RSV-related admissionsActual cohort of admissions during 2009 RSV season-Included transportation, admission, physician fees and accommodation. No additional fees for resuscitation procedures, emergency visits, medications, outpatient follow-up, underestimating costs.10
    Cost of transportation to hospitalActual amounts invoiced by medical evacuation companies for each medical evacuation-Source: medical evacuation companies/airlines
    Cost of transportation back to home communityEquivalent of regularly scheduled economy flightMinimum estimateSource: directly from commercial airlines.
    Assumed return flight was economy commercial airlines, when sometime patients are transported by air ambulance with medical personnel.
    Inpatient costsActual costs charged by hospital per day of hospital stay, differentiated by ward/ICU-Source: territorial governments, hospital finance departments
    Physician costEstimated from OHIP Schedule of Benefits and Fees for pediatrics differentiated by day of admission, ward/ICU fees and whether mechanical ventilation required-This involves 9 hospitals where OHIP billings were mid-range. Exclusion of after-hours, emergency and procedural fees gives minimum estimates of costs.
    Risk reduction96%88% scenario CFor preterm Inuit infants in Nunavut13
    Palivizumab cost$225.75 per kg of estimated weight + 5% wastage + $50 administration$225.75 per kg of estimated weight +15% wastage + $50 administrationSource: AbbVie Canada, as actual drug acquisition cost (see Table 3). Sensitivity analysis increases wastage threefold. Assumes vial sharing.
    Estimated weightWeight at 50% percentile for each month of age from CDC growth charts-CDC chosen rather than World Health Organization to have higher estimates of cost

    Note: CDC = US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ICU = intensive care unit, OHIP = Ontario Health Insurance Plan, RSV = respiratory syncytial virus.

    *Without significant congenital heart or chronic lung disease.

      • View popup
      Table 2: Costs for admissions related to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)
      CostsNorthwest TerritoriesNunavutNunavik
      OverallKitikmeot RegionKivalliq RegionQikiqtaaluk Region
      No. of RSV-related admissions85222181230
      Total cost of all RSV-related admissions, $177 2562 871 1371 496 3651 094 603280 169632 139
      Total transportation (range per admission)48 243 (0-24 564)795 915 (0-41 175)486 753 (15 211-41 175)216 086 (3448-22 501)93 077 (0-18 657)146 364 (0-22 860)
      Total inpatient (range per admission)114 660 (9360-18 720)1 932 089 (5218-209 266)950 705 (10 530-166 773)815 436 (5218-209 266)165 948 (6396-31 308)414 340 (2506-88 200)
          Total physician14 353123 93353 95849 13120 84562 135
          Total accommodation019 200495013 9503009300
      Average cost (range) per RSV-related admission, $22 157 (10 988-45 225)55 214 (12 856-240 410)68 017 (31 196-217 430)60 811 (17 454-240 410)23 347 (17 276-44 277)21 071 (3978-115 418)
      • View popup
      Table 3: Cost, doses and population at risk for universal palivizumab prophylaxis for healthy infants with scenarios A* and B† during the 2009 RSV season
      Age; weight, kgMonth; monthly cost per dose per eligible healthy term infant, $
      December 2008January 2009February 2009March 2009April 2009May 2009
      Birth; 3.5880880880880880880
      1 mo; 4.3106910691069106910691069
      2 mo; 5.05124712471247124712471247
      3 mo; 5.75141314131413141314131413
      4 mo; 6.45157915791579157915791579
      5 mo; 7.0170917091709170917091709
      6 mo; 7.55-18401840184018401840
      7 mo; 8.05--1958195819581958
      8 mo; 8.45---205320532053
      9 mo; 8.85----21482148
      10 mo; 9.25-----2243Sum
      Sum scenario A7897973711 69513 74815 89618 13977 112
      Sum scenario B78977897789778977897789747 382

      Note: RSV = respiratory syncytial virus.

      *Scenario A: Eligible infants are those who would be less than 6 months of age by Jan. 1, 2009 or born before May 31, 2009. Prophylaxis is stopped by May 31, 2009. Annual cost per region = $6423.82 × number of births/year. Monthly doses = number of doses per month x 1/12 × births/year. Annual doses = 51 × 1/12 births/year = 4.25 × births/year. Population at risk = 51/72 × births/year.

      †Scenario B: Eligible infants are those who would be less than 6 months of age by Jan. 1, 2009 or born before May 31, 2009. Prophylaxis is stopped by 6 months of age. Model assumes that an equivalent number of infants are born as surpass the age criteria. Annual cost per region = $7897/month × 6/12 births/year = $3947.29 × births. Monthly doses = number of doses per month × 1/12 birth/year = 6/12 × births. Annual doses = 6 × 6/12 births/year. Population at risk = 36/72 × births/year.

        • View popup
        Table 4: Scenario A: Cost-effectiveness of palivizumab prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis in healthy term infants who were less than 6 months of age at the start of the 2009 RSV season or were born during the season per RSV-related hospital admission avoided
        VariableNorthwest TerritoriesNunavutNunavut without IqaluitKitikmeot RegionKivalliq RegionQikiqtaaluk RegionQikiqtaaluk Region without IqaluitNunavik
        Total births in 2009739816701114245457342250
        Healthy newborns*679.9750.7644.9104.9225.4420.4314.6230
        Estimated rate of RSV-related admission per 1000 population at risk†16.697.8111.6296.1112.740.349.4184.1
        Base case: no prophylaxis, RSV-related admissions in healthy term infants admitted Jan. 1 to June 30, 2009
        No. of RSV-related admissions852512218121130
        Total cost of admissions, $177 2562 871 1372 856 5611 496 3651 094 603280 169265 593632 139
        Scenario A: universal palivizumab prophylaxis for healthy term infants, with 96% risk reduction
        No. of RSV-related admissions0.32.12.00.90.70.50.41.2
        Total cost of admissions, $7090114 845114 26259 85543 78411 20710 62425 286
        Estimated cost of palivizumab, $4 367 5554 822 3624 142 722673 8591 447 9292 700 5742 020 9341 477 479
        Total cost (palivizumab + admissions), $4 374 6454 937 2074 256 984733 7141 491 7132 711 7812 031 5581 502 765
        Scenario A v. base case
        Incremental cost for RSV prophylaxis, $4 197 3892 066 0701 400 423-762 652397 1112 431 6111 765 965870 625
        Incremental cases of RSV infection avoided7.749.949.021.117.311.510.628.8
        ICER per RSV-related admission avoided, $545 11541 40428 580-36 14522 954211 444166 60030 230
        NNT‡ to prevent 1 RSV-related admission62.710.79.33.59.225.821.15.7

        Note: ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, NNT = number needed to treat, RSV = respiratory syncytial virus.

        *Estimated to be 92% of all newborns.

        †Admissions for RSV infection between Jan. 1 and June 30, 2009, with population at risk of healthy term infants born after July 1, 2008, to May 31, 2009.

        ‡1/absolute risk reduction. Absolute risk reduction was defined as the untreated admission RSV rate - ([1 - efficacy] × untreated RSV admission rate). Untreated admission rate = number of admissions with RSV in those not treated/population at risk.

          • View popup
          Table 6: Scenario C: cost-effectiveness of palivizumab prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis in healthy term infants who were less than 6 months of age at the start of the 2009 RSV season or were born during the season per RSV-related hospital admission avoided, with 88% risk reduction and 15% palivizumab wastage
          VariableNorthwest TerritoriesNunavutNunavut without IqaluitKitikmeotKivalliqQikiqtaalukQikiqtaaluk without IqaluitNunavik
          Total births in 2009739816701114245457342250
          Healthy newborns679.9750.7644.9104.9225.4420.4314.6230
          Estimated rate of RSV-related admissions per 1000 population at risk†16.697.8111.6296.1112.740.349.4184.1
          Base case: no prophylaxis, RSV-related admissions in healthy term infants
          Total no. of RSV-related admissions documented in 2009 in healthy term infants852512218121130
          Total cost of admissions, $177 2562 871 1372 856 5611 496 3651 094 603280 169265 593632 139
          Scenario C: universal palivizumab prophylaxis of healthy term infants, with 88% risk reduction
          Total no. of RSV-related admissions0.966.246.122.642.161.441.323.6
          Total costs of RSV-related admissions, $21 271344 536342 787179 564131 35233 62031 87175 857
          Estimated cost of palivizumab, $5 009 1705 653 8594 874 975840 4271 708 2853 105 1482 326 2641 720 849
          Total costs (palivizumab + RSV-related admissions), $5 030 4415 998 3955 217 7621 019 9911 839 6373 138 7682 358 1351 796 706
          Scenario C v. base case
          Incremental cost for RSV prophylaxis, $4 853 1853 127 2592 361 202-476 374745 0352 858 5992 092 5421 164 566
          Incremental RSV-related admissions avoided7.045.844.919.415.810.69.726.4
          ICER per RSV-related admission avoided, $714 58069 08752 898-26 87747 201277 275221 72444 976
          NNT to prevent 1 RSV-related admission77.213.111.54.311.431.826.07.0

          Note: ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, NNT = number needed to treat, RSV = respiratory syncytial virus.

            • View popup
            Table 7: ICERs for palivizumab prophylaxis for healthy term infants in the Canadian Arctic, comparing scenario A, in which prophylaxis is continued to end of RSV season, to scenario B, in which prophylaxis is stopped at 5 months of age
            VariableNorthwest TerritoriesNunavutNunavut without IqaluitKitikmeot RegionKivalliq RegionQikiqtaaluk RegionQikiqtaaluk Region without IqaluitNunavik
            Base case (no prophylaxis)
            Total costs, $177 2562 871 1372 856 5611 496 3651 094 603280 169265 593632 139
            No. of admissions for RSV infection852512218121130
            Scenario A
            Total costs, $4 374 6454 937 2074 256 984733 7141 491 7132 711 7812 031 5581 502 765
            No. of admissions for RSV infection0.32.120.90.70.50.41.2
            Scenario B
            Total costs, $2 690 8523 457 3123 039 106705 0241 058 0041 694 2851 276 078990 964
            No. of admissions for RSV infection0.311.711.65.74.61.41.47
            Scenario A v. base case
            Incremental costs, $4 197 3892 066 0701 400 423-762 652397 1112 431 6111 765 965870 625
            Incremental no. of RSV-related admissions7.749.94921.117.311.510.628.8
            ICER (cost per RSV-related admission avoided), $545 11541 40428 580-36 14522 954211 444166 60030 230
            Scenario B v. base case
            Incremental costs, $2 513 597586 175182 545-791 342-36 5991 414 1161 010 486358 825
            Incremental no. of RSV-related admissions7.740.339.416.313.410.69.623
            ICER (cost per RSV-related admission avoided), $326 44114 5454633-48 549-2731133 407105 25915 601
            Scenario A v. scenario B
            Incremental costs, $1 683 7931 479 8951 217 87828 690433 7091 017 496755 480511 801
            Incremental no. of RSV-related admissions09.69.64.83.90.915.8
            ICER (cost per RSV-related admission avoided), $-154 156126 8625977111 2071 130 551755 48088 242

            Note: ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, RSV = respiratory syncytial virus.

              • View popup
              Table 5: Scenario B: cost-effectiveness of palivizumab prophylaxis in infants less than 5 months (6 months of protection) versus no prophylaxis of all healthy term infants 6 months of age at the start of the 2009 per RSV-related hospital admission avoided
              VariableNorthwest TerritoriesNunavutNunavut without IqaluitKitikmeotKivalliqQikiqtaalukQikiqtaaluk without IqaluitNunavik
              Total births in 2009739816701114245457342250
              Healthy newborns679.9750.7644.9104.9225.4420.4314.6230
              Rate of RSV infection in healthy infants < 6 mo of age January to June 2009, per 1000 live births23.5111.9127.1324.1124.252.363.6208.7
              Base case: no prophylaxis, RSV-related admissions in healthy term infants admitted Jan. 1 to June 30, 2009
              No. of RSV-related admissions among infants < 6 mo of age842411714111024
              No. of RSV-related admissions among infants ≥ 6 mo of age0101054116
              Total cost of RSV-related admissions among infants < 6 mo of age, $2 476 1002 461 5231 255 638964 915255 547240 971571 929
              Total cost of RSV-related admissions among infants ≥ 6 mo of age, $0395 037395 038240 727129 68824 62224 62260 210
              Total cost of all RSV-related admissions, $177 2562 871 1372 856 5611 496 3651 094 603280 169265 593632 139
              Scenario B: palivizumab prophylaxis of healthy term infants up to 5 months of age, with 96% risk reduction
              No. of RSV-related admissions among infants < 6 mo (received prophylaxis)0.31.71.60.70.60.40.41.0
              No. of RSV-related admissions among infants ≥ 6 mo of age (did not receive prophylaxis)0101054116
              Costs of admissions of infants < 6 mo of age, $709099 04498 46150 22638 59710 222963922 877
              Cost of admissions of infants ≥ 6 mo of age, $0395 037395 038240 727129 68824 62224 62260 210
              Total cost of all RSV-related admissions, $7090494 081493 499290 953168 28534 84434 26183 087
              Estimated cost of palivizumab, $2 683 7622 963 2312 545 607414 071889 7191 659 4411 241 817907 877
              Total costs (palivizumab + all RSV-related admissions), $*2 690 8523 457 3123 039 106705 0241 058 0041 694 2851 276 078990 964
              Scenario B v. base case
              Incremental cost for RSV prophylaxis, $2 513 597586 175182 545-791 342-36 5991 414 1161 010 486358 825
              Incremental RSV-related admissions avoided7.730.329.411.39.49.68.617
              ICER per RSV-related admission avoided, $326 44114 5454633-48 549-2731133 407105 25915 601
              NNT to prevent 1 RSV-related admission among infants < 6 mo of age44.39.38.23.28.419.916.45.0

              Note: ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, NNT = number needed to treat, RSV = respiratory syncytial virus.

              *Include the revised cost with 96% risk reduction if < 6 months of age, and full costs if ≥ 6 months of age (no prophylaxis).

              PreviousNext
              Back to top

              In this issue

              CMAJ Open: 4 (4)
              Vol. 4, Issue 4
              13 Dec 2016
              • Table of Contents
              • Index by author

              Article tools

              Respond to this article
              Print
              Download PDF
              Article Alerts
              To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
              Email Article

              Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ Open.

              NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

              Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
              Cost-effectiveness of palivizumab compared to no prophylaxis in term infants residing in the Canadian Arctic
              (Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ Open
              (Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ Open web site.
              CAPTCHA
              This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
              Citation Tools
              Cost-effectiveness of palivizumab compared to no prophylaxis in term infants residing in the Canadian Arctic
              Anna Banerji, Kaspar Ng, Theo J. Moraes, Vladimir Panzov, Joan Robinson, Bonita E. Lee
              Oct 2016, 4 (4) E623-E633; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20150052

              Citation Manager Formats

              • BibTeX
              • Bookends
              • EasyBib
              • EndNote (tagged)
              • EndNote 8 (xml)
              • Medlars
              • Mendeley
              • Papers
              • RefWorks Tagged
              • Ref Manager
              • RIS
              • Zotero
              Share
              Cost-effectiveness of palivizumab compared to no prophylaxis in term infants residing in the Canadian Arctic
              Anna Banerji, Kaspar Ng, Theo J. Moraes, Vladimir Panzov, Joan Robinson, Bonita E. Lee
              Oct 2016, 4 (4) E623-E633; DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20150052
              Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
              • Tweet Widget
              • Facebook Like

              Related Articles

              • PubMed
              • Google Scholar

              Cited By...

              • No citing articles found.
              • Google Scholar

              Similar Articles

              Collections

              • Clinical
                • Aboriginal Health
                • Immunology
                  • Drugs: immunological products and vaccines
                • Pediatrics
                  • Infants
                • Respiratory Medicine (Respirology)
                  • Pediatric respirology
                  • Other respiratory infections

              Content

              • Current issue
              • Past issues
              • Collections
              • Alerts
              • RSS

              Authors & Reviewers

              • Overview for Authors
              • Preparing manuscripts
              • Manuscript Submission Checklist
              • Publication Fees
              • Forms
              • Editorial Policies
              • Editorial Process
              • Patient-Oriented Research
              • Submit a manuscript
              • Manuscript Progress
              • Submitting a letter
              • Information for Reviewers

              About

              • General Information
              • Staff
              • Editorial Board
              • Advisory Panel
              • Contact Us
              • Advertising
              • Media
              • Reprints
              • Copyright and Permissions
              • Accessibility
              • CMA Civility Standards
              CMAJ Group

              Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

              All editorial matter in CMAJ OPEN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

              To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

              View CMA's Accessibility policy.

               

              Powered by HighWire