Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T08:32:08.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Population Risk of Syringe Reuse: Estimating the Probability of Transmitting Bloodborne Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Christopher Sikora ,
A. Uma Chandran ,
A. Mark Joffe ,
David Johnson  and
Marcia Johnson
Christopher Sikora*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
A. Uma Chandran
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada
A. Mark Joffe
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada
David Johnson
Affiliation:
Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada
Marcia Johnson
Affiliation:
Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada
*
Community Medicine Residency Program, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Main Fl, West Tower 101, 14310-111 Ave, Edmonton, AB T5M 3Z7, Canada (csikora@ualberta.ca)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Background.

In 2008, the Medical Officer of Health at Alberta Health Services (Edmonton, Canada) was notified that, in some practice settings, a syringe was used to administer medication through the side port of an intravenous circuit and then the syringe, with residual drug, was used to administer medication to other patients in the same manner. This practice has been implicated in several outbreaks of bloodborne infection in hospital and clinic settings.

Methods.

A risk assessment model was developed to predict the risk of a patient contracting a bloodborne viral infection from the practice. The risk of transmission was defined as the product of 5 factors: (1) the population prevalence of a specific bloodborne pathogen, (2) the probability of finding a viral bloodborne pathogen in an intravenous circuit, (3) the rate of syringe reuse, (4) the probability of causing disease given a bloodborne pathogen exposure, and (5) the susceptibility of the exposed person.

Results.

The risk was modeled first with consistent use of the proximal port of the intravenous circuit. The risk of transmission of hepatitis B virus was approximately 12–53 transmission events per 1,000,000 exposure events for a range of practice probabilities (ie, frequency of the risk practice) from 20% to 80%, respectively. The risk of transmission of hepatitis C virus was approximately 1.0–4.3 transmission events per 1,000,000 exposure events for the same practice probability range, and the risk of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus was approximately 0.03–0.15 transmission events per 1,000,000 exposure events for the same practice probability range. The use of the distal port was associated with a 10-fold decrease in the risk.

Conclusions.

Practitioners must practice safe, aseptic injection techniques. The model presented here can be used to estimate the risk of disease transmission in situations where reuse has occurred and can serve as a framework for informing public health action.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 31 , Issue 7 , July 2010 , pp. 748 - 754
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Chant, K, Lowe, D, Rubin, G, et al. Patient-to-patient transmission of HIV in private surgical consulting rooms. Lancet 1993;342:1548–1549.Google Scholar
2.Germain, JM, Carbonne, A, Thiers, V, et al. Patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis C virus through the use of multidose vials during general anesthesia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:789–792.Google Scholar
3.Tallis, GF, Ryan, GM, Lambert, SB, et al. Evidence of patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis C virus through contaminated intravenous anaesthetic ampoules. J Viral Hepat 2003;10(3): 234–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Bosch, X. Newspaper apportions blame in Spanish hepatitis C scandal. Lancet 2000;355(9206): 818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Transmission of hepatitis B and C viruses in outpatient settings—New York, Oklahoma, and Nebraska, 2000-2002. MMWR 2003; 52(38):901–906.Google Scholar
6.Acute hepatitis C virus infections attributed to unsafe infection practices at an endoscopy clinic—Nevada, 2007. MMWR 2008;57(19): 513–517.Google Scholar
7.Thompson, ND, Perz, JF, Moorman, AC, Holmberg, SD. Nonhospital healthcare-associated hepatitis B and C virus transmission: United States, 1998-2008. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:33–39.Google Scholar
8. Bloodborne Pathogens Section, Blood Safety Surveillance and Health Care-Acquired Infections Division, Public Health Agency of Canada. Hepatitis B fact sheet. 2003. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/hcai-iamss/bbp-pts/hepatitis/hep_b-eng.php. Accessed November 25, 2009.Google Scholar
9.Houston, S, Rowe, BH, Mashinter, L, et al. Sentinel surveillance of HIV and hepatitis C virus in two urban emergency departments. CJEM 2004; 6(2):89–96.Google Scholar
10. Surveillance and Risk Assessment Division, Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Infectious Diseases 8c Emergency Preparedness Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada. Inventory of HIV incidence and prevalence studies in Canada. 2006. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/hips-ipvc06/index.html. Accessed November 25, 2009.Google Scholar
11.Trepanier, CA, Lessard, MR, Brochu, JG, Denault, PH. Risk of cross-infection related to the multiple use of disposable syringes. Can J Anaesth 1990;37:156–159.Google Scholar
12.Tait, AR, Tuttle, DB. Preventing perioperative transmission of infection: a survey of anaesfhesiology practice. Anesth Analg 1995;80:764–769.Google Scholar
13.Kantor, G, Chung, F. Anaesthesia drug cost, control and utilization in Canada. Can J Anaesth 1996;43:9–16.Google Scholar
14.Halkes, MJ, Snow, D. Reuse of equipment between patients receiving total intravenous anaesthesia: a postal survey of current practice. Anaesthesia 2003;58:571–596.Google Scholar
15.Ryan, AJ, Webster, CS, Merry, AF, Grieve, DJ. A national survey of infection control practice by New Zealand anaesthetists. Anaesth Intensive Care 2006;34:68–74.Google Scholar
16.Beltrami, EM, Williams, IT, Shapiro, CN, Chamberland, ME. Risk and management of bloodborne infections in healthcare workers. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000;13(3):385–407.Google Scholar
17.US Public Health Service. Updated US Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to HBV, HCV, and HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. MMWR Recomm Rep 2001;50(RR-11):1–52.Google Scholar
18.Whittle, H, Jaffar, S, Wansbrough, M, et al. Observational study of vaccine efficacy 14 years after trial of hepatitis B vaccination in Gambian children. BMJ 2002;325(7364):569.Google Scholar
19.Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Infection control in anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2008;63(9): 1027–1036.Google Scholar
20.American Society of Anesthesiologists. Recommendations for infection control for the practice of anesthesiology (2nd ed). 1999. http://www.asahq.org/publicationsAndServices/infectioncontrol.pdf. Accessed November 25, 2009.Google Scholar
21. Division of Nosocomial and Occupational Infections, Bureau of Infectious Diseases, Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Health Protection Branch, Health Canada Ottawa. Infection control guidelines: preventing the transmission of bloodborne pathogens in health care and public services settings. 1997. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/ccdr-rmtc/97pdf7cdr23s3e.pdf. Accessed November 25, 2009.Google Scholar
22.Jain, SK, Persaud, D, Perl, TM, et al. Nosocomial malaria and sahne flush. Emerg Infect Dis 2005;11(7):1097–1099.Google Scholar
23.Alter, HJ, Holland, PV, Purcell, RH, et al. Posttransfusion hepatitis after exclusion of commercial and hepatitis B antigen-positive donors. Ann Intern Med 1972;77:691–699.Google Scholar
24.Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ. How to assess risk of disease transmission to patients when there is a failure to follow recommended disinfection and sterilization guidelines. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28(2): 146–155.Google Scholar
25.Krever, H. Final report: Commission of Inquiry on the Blood System in Canada. Ottawa, Canada: The Commission, 1997. http://epe.lac-bac.gcxa/100/200/301/hcan-scan/commission_blood_final_rep-e/index.html. Accessed May 24, 2010.Google Scholar