Table 1:

Characteristics of the included studies

Study, year; countryNo. of participants (F/M, %)Age, mean ± SD,* yrAssessment tool or measureDesign; durationInterventionControlOutcomes
Nutrition interventions
Wu et al., (24) 2018; Taiwan40 (56/44)O: 74.0
I: 73.5 ± 2.4, 75.0 ± 2.4, 72.8 ± 1.6
C: 75.9 ± 1.7
Fried’s frailty phenotype§RCT; 3 moOral nutrition supplements, fortified/enhanced foods, nutrition/dietitian counsellingGeneral nutrition informationHealth (and death), physical function (and quality of life), mobility, diet quality
Niccoli et al., (25) 2017; Canada53 (68/32)O: 81.3 ± 1.0
I: 81.77 ± 1.68
C: 80.33 ± 1.57
Fried’s frailty phenotype§RCT; ~ 3–4 wkFortified/enhanced foodsControl food without supplementsPhysical function (and quality of life), frailty, mobility
Park et al., (26) 2018; Korea120 (65/35)I: 77.30 ± 3.67, 76.80 ± 3.70
C: 76.83 ± 3.86
Cardiovascular Health Study criteria§RCT; 12 wkFortified/enhanced foodsPlacebo powderPhysical function (and quality of life), frailty, mobility, diet quality
Ng et al., (8), (36), (37) 2015; Singapore246 (61/39)O: 70.0 ± 4.7
I: 69.7 ± 4.23
C: 70.1 ± 5.02
Cardiovascular Health Study criteria§RCT; 6 moOral nutrition supplements, fortified/enhanced foodsPlacebo supplementHealth (and death), physical function (and quality of life), use of health care services, frailty, mobility
Kim et al., (27) 2013; South Korea87 (79/21)I: 78.9 ± 5.5
C: 78.4 ± 6.0
Slow gait speed, MNARCT; 12 wkOral nutrition supplements, fortified/enhanced foodsNo contact or careHealth (and death), physical function (and quality of life), frailty, mobility, diet quality
Tieland et al., (28), (38) 2012; the Netherlands65 (55/45)O: 83.1 ± 5.1
I: 78.0 ± 1
C: 81.0 ± 1
Fried’s frailty phenotypeRCT; 24 wkFortified/enhanced foodsPlacebo supplementHealth (and death), physical function (and quality of life), mobility, diet quality
Latham et al., (22) 2003; New Zealand243 (53/47)O: 79.1 ± 6.9
I: 79.0 (95% CI 77 to 80)
C: 80.0 (95% CI 78 to 81)
Clinical measures of frailty§RCT; 3 moOral nutrition supplementsPlacebo supplementPhysical function (and quality of life), mobility
de Jong et al., (23), (39), (40) 2000; the Netherlands217 (70/30)O: 79.0
I: 79.6 ± 4.8
C: 79.3 ± 6.6
Required health care service (e.g., home care, meal delivery)RCT 17 wkFortified/enhanced foodsControl food without supplementsPhysical function (and quality of life), mobility, diet quality
Combined-approach interventions
Kang et al., (29) 2019; China115 (62/38)O: 77.3
I: 76.79 ± 7.11, 78.04 ± 6.82
Fried’s frailty phenotype§CCT; 12 wkFortified/enhanced foods, muscle strengtheningInformation about diet to maintain current weight, usual daily exercise programHealth (and death), physical function (and quality of life), mobility
Serra-Prat et al., (30) 2017; Spain172 (56/44)O: 78.3
I: 77.9 ± 5.0
C: 78.8 ± 4.9
Fried’s frailty phenotypeRCT; 12 moNutrition/dietitian counselling, mixed physical activity (muscle strengthening/aerobic/exercises)Usual careFrailty, health (and death), physical function (and quality of life), mobility
Luger et al., (31), (41) (44) 2016; Austria80 (84/16)O: 82.8 ± 8.0
I: 83.0 ± 8.1
C: 82.5 ± 8.0
SHARE-FI§RCT; 12 wkNutrition/dietitian counselling, muscle strengtheningVisited 2×/wk by “buddies”Frailty, physical function (and quality of life), mobility
Kwon et al., (32) 2015; Japan89 (100/0)O: 76.8
I: 76.5 ± 3.8, 77.0 ± 4.2
C: 76.9 ± 3.9
Fried’s frailty phenotype§RCT; 3 moNutrition/dietitian counselling, muscle strengtheningGeneral health education session 1×/moFrailty, physical function (and quality of life), mobility
Tieland et al., (33), (45), (46) 2012; the Netherlands62 (66/34)I: 78 ± 9
C: 79 ± 6
Fried’s frailty phenotypeRCT; 24 wkFortified/enhanced foods, muscle strengtheningExercise training 2×/wk, placebo supplement 2×/dHealth (and death), physical function (and quality of life), mobility, diet quality
Yamada et al., (35) 2012; Japan77 (51/49)I: 74.4 ± 7.3
C: 75.6 ± 6.0
Frailty status as certified by long-term care insurance serviceCCT; 3 moOral nutrition supplements, fortified/enhanced foods, muscle strengtheningBoth groups received exercise trainingPhysical outcomes (and quality of life), mobility
de Jong et al., (23), (39), (40) 2000;** the Netherlands217 (70/30)O: 79.0
I: 79.2 ± 6.1
C: 79.3 ± 6.6
Required health care service (e.g., home care, meal delivery)RCT; 17 wkFortified/enhanced foods, mixed physical activity (muscle strengthening/aerobic/exercises)Control food, social program once every 2 wk for 90 minPhysical function (and quality of life), mobility, diet quality
Nykänen et al., (34) 2012; Finland159 (79/21)O: 83.1 ± 5.1
I: 83.2 ± 5.2
C: 82.9 ± 5.0
Cardiovascular Health Study criteria§CCT; 1 yrNutrition/dietitian counselling, mixed physical activity (muscle strengthening/aerobic/exercises)Usual careFrailty, diet quality
  • Note: C = control, CCT = clinical controlled trial, CI = confidence interval, F = female, I = intervention, M = male, MNA = Mini Nutritional Assessment, O = overall, RCT = randomized controlled trial, SD = standard deviation, SHARE-FI = Frailty Instrument of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe.

  • * Except where noted otherwise.

  • Not including follow-up, if applicable.

  • Values based on reported baseline, which may not equal the number randomly allocated but, rather, the number who completed the intervention.

  • § Authors indicated that the assessment tool was modified from standard protocol.

  • Describes nutrition-only intervention arm compared to control, as this study was also included in the combined-approach analysis.

  • ** Describes combined-approach intervention arm compared to control, as this study was also included in the nutrition analysis.