Table 3: Comparison of results from Bayesian and frequentist random-effects meta-analysis models
MeasureBayesian meta-analysisFrequentist meta-analysis
DerSimonian-Laird approachSidik-Jonkman approach
Overall measure of treatment effect: pooled risk ratio (95% interval)*0.25 (0.08-0.47)0.42 (0.29-0.59)0.37 (0.21-0.65)
Measures of between-study heterogeneity
Between-study variance (log risk ratio scale) (95% interval)*0.64 (0.06-1.75)0.02 (SE 0.19)0.27 (SE 0.26)
    Q-test p value-0.40290.4029
95% prediction interval for risk ratio0.02-1.340.24-0.69†0.09-1.45†
    P (predicted risk ratio < 1)0.96--
    I2 statistic (95% interval), %*67.4 (1.6-96.7)4 (0-64)41.26 (0-77)

Note: SE = standard error.

*95% credible interval for the Bayesian meta-analysis, 95% confidence interval for the frequentist meta-analyses.

†Calculated by means of the methods described by Higgins and colleagues.45