RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Estimating patient-borne water and electricity costs in home hemodialysis: a simulation
JF CMAJ Open
FD Canadian Medical Association
SP E61
OP E65
DO 10.9778/cmajo.20160108
VO 5
IS 1
A1 Matthew Nickel
A1 Wes Rideout
A1 Nikhil Shah
A1 Frances Reintjes
A1 Justin Z. Chen
A1 Robert Burrell
A1 Robert P. Pauly
YR 2017
UL http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/5/1/E61.abstract
AB Background: Home hemodialysis is associated with lower costs to the health care system compared with conventional facility-based hemodialysis because of lower staffing and overhead costs, and by transferring the treatment cost of utilities (water and power) to the patient. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility costs of home hemodialysis and create a formula such that patients and renal programs can estimate the annual patient-borne costs involved with this type of treatment.Methods: Seven common combinations of treatment duration and dialysate flows were replicated 5 times using various combinations of home hemodialysis and reverse osmosis machines. Real-time utility (electricity and water) consumption was monitored during these simulations. A generic formula was developed to allow patients and programs to calculate a more precise estimate of utility costs based on individual combinations of dialysis intensity, frequency and utility costs unique to any patient.Results: Using typical 2014 utility costs for Edmonton, the most expensive prescription was for nocturnal home hemodialysis (8 h at 300 mL/min, 6 d/wk), which resulted in a utility cost of $1269 per year; the least expensive prescription was for conventional home hemodialysis (4 h at 500 mL/min, 3 d/wk), which cost $420 per year. Water consumption makes up most of this expense, with electricity accounting for only 12% of the cost.Interpretation: We show that a substantial cost burden is transferred to the patient on home hemodialysis, which would otherwise be borne by the renal program.